The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 38 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
TeamSystem shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Processing and Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 38 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 38 |
After analyzing 38 verified reviews, TeamSystem users most value its , while roommaster users highlight ease of use. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| TeamSystem |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
−
Product Value and Competitiveness
▾
|
|
|
−
Customer Service Improvement
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | TeamSystem |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 12 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #21 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #23 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | TeamSystem |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #20 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #27 4 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #24 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | TeamSystem |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #5 27 reviews |
| Europe | — | #29 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #17 0 reviews |
Choosing the right channel management software is essential for your hotel's distribution efficiency, revenue management, and operational clarity. Both Figaro by TeamSystem and roommaster Channel Manager aim to streamline your distribution process, but they tackle different needs and offer contrasting user experiences. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize ease of use and recent reviews or advanced features and larger partner networks.
Figaro, developed by TeamSystem, is a review management platform with AI-driven insights aimed at enhancing customer feedback handling. Conversely, roommaster specializes in distribution automation across a vast network of OTAs and GDS, with a focus on inventory and rate synchronization. Which one better addresses your current hotel needs?
Figaro by TeamSystem is designed to improve customer feedback analysis, offering AI-generated summaries that help your team rapidly understand guest sentiment and pinpoint areas for improvement. However, it lacks a dedicated channel management component and does not have verified partner integrations, making it less suitable if your primary goal is distribution automation.
roommaster Channel Manager, on the other hand, integrates directly with over 56 verified partners including major OTAs and GDS platforms, making it ideal for hotels aiming to maximize reach and maintain rate parity effortlessly. It reduces distribution management time by 85%, but it does not focus on customer review analysis or feedback management.
The core difference: Figaro offers intelligent review insights and customer sentiment tools, whereas roommaster provides extensive distribution automation and channel management. If your hotel needs to improve guest feedback handling, Figaro could be useful; if your priority is expanding distribution channels and reducing manual workload, roommaster is the better choice.
If your hotel needs to optimize distribution, automate channel connections, and reduce overbooking risks, go with roommaster. Its large partner network, real-time inventory updates, and analytics dashboard make it a standout for properties seeking to expand visibility and streamline operations.
In contrast, if your team focuses on managing guest reviews, analyzing customer sentiment, and improving overall reputation, Figaro’s AI-driven review summaries are compelling — though it lacks direct distribution management features. For properties with a heavy focus on reputation and customer feedback, Figaro could complement existing systems but isn't a substitute for dedicated channel management.
Summary: For distribution-heavy hotels and those seeking operational efficiency in channel management, roommaster’s larger partner network and feature set make it the clear choice. For hotels prioritizing guest feedback analysis, Figaro offers specialized insights, but its lack of distribution tools limits its scope.
Roommaster’s interface receives high praise for its straightforward design, with a recent average ease-of-use rating of 4.39 out of 5. Users report that staff can learn the system quickly, with many citing minimal hardware requirements and simple troubleshooting. Support and onboarding are rated 4 out of 5, with reviews emphasizing responsive customer service and helpful training resources.
Figaro, by comparison, has a lower usability rating, primarily because it is more specialized in review management rather than user interface design. Since it lacks a dedicated onboarding or support system highlighted in recent reviews, it appears less accessible for staff unfamiliar with review analytics platforms.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster offers 14 unique features centered on inventory management, multi-currency support, real-time two-way integrations, yield rules, booking reports, and more. These tools enable sophisticated rate and inventory control, making it a comprehensive platform for distribution optimization.
Figaro’s features focus solely on review analysis, sentiment scoring, and AI-generated summaries. It doesn’t include channel management, inventory control, or distribution features, limiting its scope but making it specialized in review insights.
Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s support has a 4 out of 5 rating, with recent reviews praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of their customer service team. Users appreciate quick issue resolution and clear communication, even during busy periods.
Figaro’s support details are less transparent, but given the overall review ratings and recent feedback, roommaster’s support clearly outperforms. If prompt, reliable support is a priority, roommaster’s dedicated team is the more dependable choice.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster connects with 56 verified partners, including major OTAs like Sage, GuestCentric, and Inntopia, and GDS systems. Its extensive integration network ensures comprehensive distribution coverage, plus features like channel self-mapping and inventory grid.
Figaro, however, does not list verified integrations, focusing instead on review management. Its limited integration footprint makes it less suitable if your hotel relies heavily on seamless distribution or channel connections.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster boasts a high average rating of 4.14 out of 5 from 33 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use and operational efficiency. Hotels across segments like resorts, motels, and boutique hotels rate it highly, appreciating its straightforward setup and reliable performance.
Figaro’s ratings are not available, but its lack of recent reviews and user feedback makes it difficult to gauge satisfaction levels. Based on available data, roommaster’s higher review count and recent positive feedback make it the stronger performer.
Edge: roommaster.
roommaster charges a flat fee of $300 per month, with no mention of setup or additional costs. Pricing is transparent, making it easier for your team to budget.
Figaro’s pricing details are not publicly available, which could indicate custom or higher-tier pricing. Given the lack of transparent pricing and limited review data, roommaster offers clearer value for money.
The core difference: roommaster is a comprehensive distribution platform with extensive integrations, automation, and channel management features. In contrast, Figaro specializes in review analysis, offering AI-driven sentiment insights but lacking direct distribution tools.
If your hotel’s main challenge is managing multiple channels efficiently, roommaster’s larger partner network, real-time updates, and detailed analytics make it the clear choice. It reduces distribution workload and improves visibility while providing the operational tools needed to optimize revenue.
For properties focused on guest feedback, reputation management, and sentiment analysis, Figaro provides valuable AI-driven insights. However, its limited feature scope and lack of recent, verified reviews suggest it’s better as a supplementary tool rather than a primary distribution solution.
In conclusion: For most hotels weighing the importance of distribution automation, recent reviews, and support, roommaster stands out as the superior solution. If guest review management is your top priority, consider Figaro, but be aware of its limited distribution capabilities.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| TeamSystem |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature | TeamSystem |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting |
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Beginning of each shift, our staff pulls up the dashboard which gives the arrivals, the checkouts, the list of who’s coming in, how many rooms we have as far as dirty, clean, out o..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
Room Master is praised for being easy to learn and straightforward, which supports quicker staff training and smoother operations.
Where hoteliers push back
Despite overall improvement, after-hours support remains a critical concern. Users report unresponsiveness to messages during non-business hours, caus... Despite overall improvement, after-hours support remains a critical concern. Users report unresponsiveness to messages during non-business hours, causing frustration.
Some users feel that the software's value proposition has diminished as the company seems to not invest in the product like before, making it less com... Some users feel that the software's value proposition has diminished as the company seems to not invest in the product like before, making it less competitive against other solutions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Figaro and roommaster channel manager share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Figaro offers 0 verified integration partners, while roommaster channel manager offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster channel manager leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Figaro: No. roommaster channel manager: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. TeamSystem has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property