The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Flatswire shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Flatswire users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Flatswire |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Flatswire by Flatswire and Infor HMS by Infor both aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve very different needs and have contrasting reputations. Flatswire has no recent reviews and a score of zero, indicating limited market presence and no proven track record. In contrast, Infor boasts 46 reviews, a 4.04/5 overall rating, and recent feedback, making it the more credible choice to consider.
This comprehensive comparison will help you understand which solution better aligns with your hotel’s size, complexity, and strategic goals. Are you looking for a well-established, feature-rich platform or a more limited, less proven system? Read on to find out.
Flatswire positions itself as a property management platform designed to simplify property operations, with automation meant to reduce administrative overhead. It claims to offer real-time insights and tenant management features, but it lacks verified reviews or recent user feedback, making its actual performance difficult to assess.
Infor HMS, on the other hand, is a cloud-based platform with 46 reviews in the last six months, a solid 4.04/5 rating, and features tailored for hotels aiming to improve operational workflows. Users frequently praise its automation, integrations, and modular approach, although some mention issues with software updates causing disruptions.
Given the absence of recent ratings or reviews for Flatswire, it’s hard to gauge its effectiveness. Meanwhile, Infor’s active user feedback indicates a product that hotel teams are actively using and trusting. Which solution truly meets your hotel’s operational needs?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, low-cost property management solution without the requirement for extensive integrations or advanced features, Flatswire might seem appealing. However, its lack of recent reviews and verified user feedback makes it difficult to evaluate if it can deliver on its promises.
If your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich system that automates reservations, housekeeping, reporting, and integrates with booking engines, Infor should be your choice. Its extensive feature set—20 unique capabilities including guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support—serves hotels looking to streamline complex operations and improve guest experience.
For hotels seeking a proven, well-supported platform that adapts to growth and complexity, Infor clearly outperforms Flatswire.
Flatswire’s user experience remains unverified due to no recent reviews, making it impossible to accurately assess its ease of use. Its lack of feedback indicates limited market adoption or reporting on onboarding, training, or interface design.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 on ease of use, with many reviews noting its intuitive navigation and short onboarding process. Support staff are praised for their responsiveness, and users find the system “easy to understand once the format is familiar,” with some minor frustrations over interface aesthetics.
Edge: Infor HMS
Flatswire offers no verified unique features, leaving its functional scope uncertain. Its platform appears to focus on property management fundamentals but lacks documented advanced capabilities or integrations.
Infor HMS boasts 20 features, including housekeeping modules, guest CRM, online support, multi-currency support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. Its extensive feature set automates and streamlines core hotel operations, providing a flexible and scalable solution.
Edge: Infor HMS
Flatswire provides no recent support ratings, reviews, or detailed feedback, making it impossible to evaluate customer support quality or responsiveness.
In contrast, Infor receives praise for its support team, with many reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance. Reviewers mention that the team guides them effectively through issues, which is crucial for minimizing operational disruptions.
Edge: Infor HMS
Flatswire’s integration footprint is nonexistent in verified data, suggesting limited or no third-party integrations.
Infor HMS offers 113 verified integrations, including booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, HRS, and many others such as Priority Software and Birchstreet. These integrations significantly reduce manual entry and improve operational efficiency.
Edge: Infor HMS
Flatswire has no recent reviews or ratings, making comparison impossible.
Infor HMS’s recent reviews reflect a 4.04/5 overall rating, with property types from independent to branded hotels endorsing its value. Hotels in North America and Europe, particularly boutique properties and city-center hotels, rate it highly for functionality and support. Its recent reviews consistently mention its reliability and feature set.
Edge: Infor HMS
Both Flatswire and Infor do not disclose their pricing publicly; they appear to offer custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. The absence of transparent pricing suggests that you will need to contact vendors directly for tailored proposals.
The core difference lies in proven market presence and feature depth: Flatswire remains unreviewed and untested in recent times, while Infor HMS offers a proven track record, extensive features, and active user feedback. This makes Infor the reliable choice for hotels seeking a scalable, well-supported PMS.
Choose Flatswire only if your hotel has very basic needs and is comfortable with an unverified, limited platform. Its lack of recent reviews and features suggests it’s not suitable for hotels aiming for operational growth or technology-driven guest experiences.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, an expansive feature set, and ongoing support, Infor HMS is the clear winner. It will serve your team better as you grow, adapt, and seek to elevate guest satisfaction through technology.
This detailed comparison should clarify which PMS aligns best with your hotel’s strategic goals. Given the active reviews, recent feedback, and extensive features, Infor HMS stands out as the more dependable choice to meet your operational needs today and in the future.
According to HTR's product database, Flatswire and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Flatswire |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Flatswire and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Flatswire offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Flatswire: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Flatswire has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor