The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,242 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Flyhotel shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,242 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,242 | 0 |
After analyzing 1,242 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its user-friendly interface, implementation and support, all-in-one ecosystem, while Flyhotel users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-One Ecosystem
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #1 592 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 212 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 42 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #13 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 473 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 228 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #6 116 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 93 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 435 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #7 163 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 226 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 11 reviews | — |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Flyhotel boils down to your hotel's size, operational complexity, and the level of integration you need. Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive, mature platform with extensive reviews and features, while Flyhotel’s system is simpler, more focused on guest feedback analysis and operational streamlining.
Cloudbeds commands a dominant market position, backed by over 1,000 recent reviews, high scores, and a broad global presence. Flyhotel, with no reviews or recent data, appears more niche and less proven at scale. Do you want a well-established system or a newer, less tested solution?
Cloudbeds is a full-suite property management platform that aims to unify operations, distribution, and guest experience. It offers over 64 unique features, including a channel manager, booking engine, automation tools, and revenue management, all integrated into a single system.
Flyhotel, in contrast, emphasizes guest review analysis and operational efficiency through AI-powered insights, but it lacks the extensive feature set of Cloudbeds. Its focus appears to be on leveraging customer feedback to optimize service rather than offering a broad, all-in-one PMS. Given the data, Cloudbeds’s proven scalability and feature depth make it the more reliable choice for most hotels.
Do you need a comprehensive platform or a specialized feedback analysis tool?
If your hotel needs a proven, globally trusted PMS with extensive integrations, automation, and operational tools, Cloudbeds is the clear winner. It’s ideal for properties seeking to streamline multi-channel distribution, automate workflows, and grow revenue efficiently.
If your hotel primarily requires insights from guest reviews to improve service quality and have a lightweight, feedback-focused system, Flyhotel could be suitable. However, with zero reviews or recent data, Flyhotel remains unverified for larger or more complex operations.
For most hoteliers, especially those aiming to scale, Cloudbeds’s established reputation and feature breadth outweigh Flyhotel’s narrower focus.
Cloudbeds has an impressive user rating of 4.61/5 for ease of use, supported by over 1,071 reviews, many noting its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding. Users praise how easily staff can manage reservations, check-ins, and reporting, with comments like “It’s easy to use because it offers an all-in-one solution,” and “We saw our business grow with Cloudbeds’ reports.”
Flyhotel has no available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability. Given Cloudbeds’s extensive positive feedback from diverse property types, the edge clearly goes to Cloudbeds here.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds boasts 64 features unique to its platform, including integrated channel management, real-time inventory sync, automated night audits, guest messaging, revenue management, and a mobile app. These tools support operational automation, revenue growth, and guest engagement at a granular level.
Flyhotel offers AI-powered review analysis and some operational tools but lacks the breadth of features seen in Cloudbeds. Its core strength seems to be guest feedback insights, not end-to-end property management.
Considering the extensive feature set and integration capabilities, Cloudbeds offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support is rated 4.41/5 by over 1,000 recent reviews, with many users citing prompt, helpful assistance amid complex integrations. Comments such as “Their support team is responsive and reliable,” are commonplace.
Flyhotel, on the other hand, has no reviews or support ratings available, leaving its customer service quality unverified. With Cloudbeds’s proven support reputation, the edge is straightforward.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds integrates with over 190 verified partners, including leading booking channels, payment processors, and third-party tools. Its open marketplace and extensive API support facilitate customization and growth.
Flyhotel provides no publicly available information on integrations, suggesting it may lack the flexibility or scale of Cloudbeds. For properties that need a connected tech ecosystem, Cloudbeds’s integration network is a significant advantage.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s average ratings—4.63/5 overall, 4.61/5 for ease of use, and 4.41/5 for support—are based on over 1,000 recent reviews, with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Property types like boutique hotels, hostels, and B&Bs particularly appreciate its usability and feature depth.
Flyhotel has no available reviews or ratings, so no comparative data exists. Given the recent review volume and high scores, Cloudbeds is the preferred choice from a user satisfaction perspective.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges a base price of $600/month, with no trial, implementation fees, or additional charges detailed. Its pricing model appears straightforward for small to medium-sized properties.
Flyhotel’s pricing is not publicly available; no trial, flat fee, or subscription details are provided. This lack of transparency makes cost comparison impossible, but the proven value of Cloudbeds’s extensive features often justifies its price.
Not ideal if you operate a very small, niche, or highly specialized property that only needs guest feedback analysis.
Not ideal if you need a full-featured PMS, multi-channel distribution, or revenue management tools, especially given the lack of verified reviews and integrations.
Cloudbeds is a mature, feature-rich PMS trusted worldwide, with proven support and extensive integrations, making it suitable for most properties seeking growth and operational efficiency. Its high review volume and recent positive feedback bolster confidence in its stability and usability.
Flyhotel remains unverified at scale, with no recent reviews or data to support its claims. Its focus on guest feedback analysis may benefit very small, feedback-driven properties but is unlikely to meet the needs of larger or growing hotels.
For most hoteliers, especially those planning to scale, Cloudbeds’s proven track record and comprehensive feature set make it the clear choice.
According to HTR's product database, Cloudbeds PMS and Flyhotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Flyhotel |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| PMS connectivity |
Showing top differences. 52 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training.... Cloudbeds is praised for its intuitive and well-organized interface, making it accessible for all staff and reducing the need for extensive training. This ease of use is particularly beneficial for daily operations such as managing reservations and performing check-in/check-out processes.
Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsivenes... Cloudbeds' implementation process and subsequent support receive mixed reviews. While its customer service is typically rated highly for responsiveness and assistance, complete feature parity on mobile and integration capabilities require more comprehensive support for a smoother transition.
Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multip... Cloudbeds offers a comprehensive solution by integrating PMS, channel management, and booking engine in one platform. This reduces the need for multiple systems, minimizing manual work and synchronizing operations in real time.
Where hoteliers push back
Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administra... Reservation workflows within Cloudbeds are simple and efficient, notably for check-in and check-out processes. This feature greatly reduces administrative load, errors, and improves overall operational productivity. The system's drag-and-drop functionality is highlighted as particularly useful.
While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be va... While Cloudbeds offers robust reporting features, users note a need for more flexibility in customization, as tailored management insights would be valuable for strategic decisions. This is a recurring theme among those seeking deeper analytics and visualization.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds PMS and Flyhotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds PMS offers 189 verified integration partners, while Flyhotel offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds PMS: No. Flyhotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 100 and Flyhotel has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor