The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 87 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
ROH shines in ease of use and client-friendly experience — especially for city-center properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 87 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 84 |
After analyzing 87 verified reviews, Folio users most value its , while ROH users highlight ease of use and client-friendly experience, all-in-one workflow and organization, payment reminders and scheduled follow-ups. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and client-friendly experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one workflow and organization
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment reminders and scheduled follow-ups
▾
|
|
|
+
Document handling and post-sign workflow
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration gaps with hotel systems
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #4 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #9 0 reviews | #4 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 3 reviews | #2 26 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 36 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 1 reviews | #2 37 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 2 reviews | #2 35 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #5 3 reviews | #2 68 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel is critical. Folio Pay by Folio and ROH by ROH both aim to streamline financial transactions, but they approach this goal differently. Folio Pay, with only 3 reviews, is newer and less proven, whereas ROH, with 65 reviews and recent feedback, offers a more established track record. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and how much confidence you place in recent customer experiences.
Both products address payment automation, but ROH’s broader feature set and more extensive support infrastructure give it a distinct advantage. Do you prioritize proven performance with extensive features, or are you looking for a newer solution with focused capabilities?
Both Folio Pay and ROH target hotel payment workflows, but their core strengths differ. Folio Pay emphasizes transforming accounts payable through rebates and flexible vendor payments, integrating tightly with folio’s procure-to-pay system. ROH, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive platform with 19 exclusive features aimed at automating guest and hotel payments, including invoice management and scheduling.
Folio Pay’s minimal review count and lack of recent feedback mean its reputation is less certain. ROH, with 10 recent reviews and an overall high score, clearly demonstrates its market presence. Which approach aligns more with your hotel’s ongoing operational focus?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, cloud-based supplier payment platform with rebate incentives, Folio Pay could be suitable. It's designed for teams that want to improve accounts payable processes, especially if already invested in Folio’s broader procure-to-pay ecosystem.
Conversely, if you seek a flexible, feature-rich payment solution capable of managing guest payments, invoicing, and scheduling with extensive integrations, ROH is the better choice. Its 19 exclusive features and strong user feedback make it more adaptable across different property types and operational sizes, especially in the luxury or resort segments.
For most hotels aiming for proven, comprehensive functionality, ROH’s proven track record makes it the safer pick. Folio Pay may be attractive for those seeking a niche solution with rebates, but its limited review data warrants caution.
Folio Pay excels in ease of use, earning a 5/5 rating from its few reviews, with users describing it as an “easy system to handle” and “excellent tool” that allows vendors to be paid quickly. Its interface is praised for simplicity, although some note transfer times could improve. Given its minimal review count, these insights are tentative but positive.
ROH also boasts a very high ease-of-use rating at 4.95/5, with reviews highlighting its user-friendly, intuitive interface. Users appreciate how quickly both hotel staff and clients adapt to the platform, making payment processes smooth and straightforward.
Edge: Folio.
ROH offers a significantly broader feature set with 19 exclusive capabilities, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link, recurring payments, and acceptance of multiple card types like Apple Pay and Google Pay. These features support complex, multi-layered payment workflows suited for large or sophisticated hotel operations.
Folio Pay provides core payment processing functions but lacks the extensive feature variety found in ROH. It focuses more on transforming accounts payable processes and generating rebates rather than offering a wide array of payment tools.
Edge: ROH.
Both products demonstrate strong support reputations, but ROH’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.97/5, with reviews praising its support staff as “great” and its onboarding as “smooth.” ROH’s ongoing support and training appear more established, especially given its larger user base.
Folio Pay, with a 5/5 support rating, is described as meeting needs effectively, but with fewer reviews and less recent feedback, its support reputation isn’t as robust.
Edge: ROH.
ROH has one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, giving it a slight edge in connectivity. Folio Pay currently has no verified partners, limiting its integration options and possibly requiring manual processes or custom solutions for other hotel systems.
The limited integrations of Folio Pay could pose challenges for hotels seeking seamless technology ecosystems. ROH’s existing integration demonstrates its capacity to connect with major hotel systems, enhancing operational efficiency.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s review count of 65, with recent feedback from 10 users, provides a more reliable gauge of hotel satisfaction. It scores consistently high on ease of use, support, and value, especially among luxury and resort hotels that praise its automation and real-time reporting.
Folio Pay, with only 3 reviews, is less proven. Its ratings are perfect based on limited data, but the small sample size and recency mean we should approach its reputation cautiously.
Edge: ROH.
Folio Pay does not disclose pricing details publicly, which may suggest custom quotes based on hotel size or needs. ROH charges a straightforward $100/month fee, with no trial or additional setup costs.
For budget-conscious hotels, the transparency of ROH’s pricing is advantageous, while Folio Pay’s custom pricing could either be a benefit or obstacle depending on your hotel’s negotiation flexibility.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH’s broader, more feature-rich platform and extensive recent reviews make it the most reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven, scalable payments solution. Its capacity to automate both guest and vendor payments, combined with strong support and integrations, addresses a wide array of hotel operational needs.
Folio Pay’s niche focus on accounts payable and rebates might appeal to hotels with specific procurement strategies, especially those already invested in Folio’s ecosystem. However, its limited review data and fewer features make it less suitable for hotels looking for a comprehensive payments platform.
In summary, if you want a dependable, highly-rated platform with proven hotel industry support, go with ROH. If your primary focus is supplier rebates and procurement control within Folio’s environment, Folio Pay could fit. For most hotels, ROH’s extensive recent positive feedback and feature set make it the safer, more confident choice.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Workflow Automation
|
|
|
| Refund Management | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
|
▾
Payment Methods
|
|
|
| Pay by Link | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Klarna Installment Plans | ||
| Accepts Apple Pay | ||
| Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments | ||
| Accepts Google Pay | ||
| Installment Plans | ||
| Accepts Paypal | ||
| Accepts AliPay | ||
| Accepts WeChatPay | ||
| Accepts Visa | ||
| Accepts American Express | ||
| Contactless Payments | ||
| Accepts Discovery | ||
| Accepts Mastercard | ||
| Accepts Diners Club | ||
|
▾
Security & Fraud Prevention
|
|
|
| Chargeback Management | ||
| Payment Tokenization | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| 3-D Secure Payments | ||
| PCI Compliance | ||
|
▾
$
Multi-Currency
|
|
|
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) | ||
|
▾
Adjustments
|
|
|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Refund Management | ||
|
▾
Hardware
|
|
|
| Elavon (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| TSYS (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| GlobalPayments (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Vantiv (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| First Data (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Heartland (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Chase (Credit Card Processing) | ||
| Multi-Processor Gateway |
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Reviewers repeatedly describe ROH as intuitive and easy for both staff and clients to use, with little training needed. They say that making payments,... Reviewers repeatedly describe ROH as intuitive and easy for both staff and clients to use, with little training needed. They say that making payments, signing documents, and reviewing booking information is straightforward for clients, which improves adoption and helps create a smoother guest experience.
A common theme is that ROH centralizes contracts, invoices, notes, signatures, and payments in one system instead of multiple tools or shared drives.... A common theme is that ROH centralizes contracts, invoices, notes, signatures, and payments in one system instead of multiple tools or shared drives. Users say this improves coordination across sales and service teams, keeps booking details organized, and lowers the risk of items getting lost in the shuffle.
Users frequently mention ROH’s automated reminders and the ability to schedule future payment correspondence as a major time saver. Reviewers say this... Users frequently mention ROH’s automated reminders and the ability to schedule future payment correspondence as a major time saver. Reviewers say this reduces manual chasing of deposits, keeps clients on track with due dates, and helps hotels protect cash flow with less staff effort.
Where hoteliers push back
A meaningful set of reviews calls out missing or incomplete integrations, especially with Delphi, Salesforce, Opera, PMS tools, and FDC. Users want le... A meaningful set of reviews calls out missing or incomplete integrations, especially with Delphi, Salesforce, Opera, PMS tools, and FDC. Users want less duplicate data entry and a real-time sync so ROH can fit more cleanly into existing hotel workflows.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Folio Pay and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Folio Pay offers 2 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Folio Pay leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Folio Pay: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Folio has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property