The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Xi Ruan Westsoft shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Xi Ruan Westsoft users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a crucial step in streamlining your hotel’s operations and elevating guest experiences. Both Xi Ruan Westsoft’s FoxHis and Infor HMS aim to serve this purpose but approach it differently. FoxHis offers a minimalistic, AI-driven platform with limited features and no recent reviews, while Infor HMS provides a robust suite of functionalities backed by over 45 reviews, including recent feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a feature-rich, well-supported system or a simpler, AI-infused solution.
The core question is whether your hotel needs a comprehensive PMS with extensive integrations and modules, or a straightforward tool with AI insights. Are you looking for a system with proven user adoption and recent reviews, or are you comfortable with a less-tested, more niche product? Let’s compare these options across key factors.
FoxHis by Xi Ruan Westsoft aims to simplify hotel management using AI summaries and guest feedback aggregation. However, it has zero reviews in the last six months, a 0/5 overall rating, and no customer support or user feedback to validate its effectiveness. Its lack of integrations and features suggests it’s not suitable for complex hotel operations.
In contrast, Infor HMS boasts over 46 reviews, a 4.04/5 overall rating, and recent positive feedback. It offers 20 distinct features, including housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support. This breadth of functionality and recent validation make Infor HMS a more viable choice. Given these differences, is your hotel prepared to invest in a system with proven support and features, or are you exploring options with limited validation?
Edge: Infor HMS.
If your hotel needs a proven, multi-module PMS with extensive features, go with Infor HMS. It’s suitable for mid-sized to large hotels seeking integrated solutions like revenue management, guest CRM, and automation, which are supported by current reviews and nearly 113 verified partners.
If your hotel is smaller, highly specialized, or looking for a lightweight, AI-centered platform, FoxHis might seem appealing. But with zero recent reviews and no demonstrated track record, it’s not recommended unless your team is prepared for unproven technology. For most hotels aiming for stability and support, Infor’s established presence makes it the clear choice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
FoxHis’s user experience details are scarce, with no reviews or ratings available. Its interface and onboarding process are unverified, leaving doubts about ease of adoption. Conversely, Infor HMS is generally considered user-friendly, with a 3.88/5 rating for ease of use, and multiple reviews praising its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding.
Support responsiveness is highly rated for Infor, with many users noting prompt and professional assistance, which accelerates staff adoption. Based on available data, Infor HMS is more likely to be easier to implement and train your team on.
Edge: Infor HMS.
FoxHis provides no documented features, while Infor HMS offers 20, including housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, multi-currency, and revenue management modules. These features support daily operations, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, crucial for mid-sized hotels.
FoxHis’s AI summaries and feedback aggregation remain unverified with no additional features listed. For hotels seeking a comprehensive, integrated PMS, Infor HMS’s feature set clearly outperforms the limited scope of FoxHis.
Edge: Infor HMS.
FoxHis’s support details and customer feedback are nonexistent, leaving you uncertain about post-implementation assistance. In contrast, Infor HMS enjoys a 4.04/5 support rating, with many reviews emphasizing prompt, professional help, which is vital during onboarding or troubleshooting.
The recent reviews underscore Infor’s reliability, whereas FoxHis’s support remains unverified. For peace of mind and ongoing assistance, Infor’s established support system is the safer option.
Edge: Infor HMS.
FoxHis does not list any verified integrations, limiting its connectivity to other hotel systems. Infor HMS, however, boasts 113 verified partners, including Booking.com, Expedia, and HQ Revenue, with integrations spanning housekeeping, revenue management, and payment processing.
A broader integration network means smoother operations and less manual work. For a hotel looking to connect various operational systems, Infor HMS provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
FoxHis has no reviews, so there's no recent data on user satisfaction or hotel ratings. Conversely, Infor HMS’s 46 reviews average a 4.04/5, with hotels across various segments, including independent hotels rated 2.5/5 and branded hotels at 4.5/5, expressing satisfaction with its functionality and support.
While some smaller properties find Infor’s interface less aesthetic, the overall high ratings and recent reviews affirm its value. For hotels seeking proven customer approval, Infor HMS is the preferred choice.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Both products do not publicly list prices, making direct comparison impossible. FoxHis’s pricing structure is entirely unavailable, and Infor HMS’s pricing is only available upon inquiry, typical for enterprise-grade PMS solutions.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your decision should consider the value delivered—Infor’s extensive features and support justify its potential higher cost for most hotels.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
At its core, Infor HMS is a comprehensive, mature PMS designed for hotels aiming to optimize operations and guest experiences through a broad feature set and proven support. FoxHis, with its focus on AI summaries and feedback, is a niche product lacking recent validation, making it unsuitable for most hotels seeking stability and support.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel needs an established, feature-rich solution with ongoing support and integration capabilities. It is ideal for medium to large hotels that want to automate and unify their operations.
Opt for FoxHis only if your hotel is small, highly experimental, and willing to accept the risks associated with unverified features and support. For most properties, Infor HMS remains the safer, smarter bet.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, FoxHis and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FoxHis and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FoxHis offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FoxHis: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Xi Ruan Westsoft has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor