The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Xi Ruan Westsoft shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Xi Ruan Westsoft users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between FoxHis by Xi Ruan Westsoft and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but they diverge sharply in maturity, support, and user feedback. While FoxHis promises AI-driven insights, its lack of recent reviews and overall satisfaction ratings raise questions about its current effectiveness. Mews, on the other hand, dominates with a substantial, recent review base and high ratings across all categories. Are you ready to prioritize proven user satisfaction and extensive integrations?
FoxHis by Xi Ruan Westsoft positions itself as an AI-enhanced management platform, claiming to aggregate guest feedback and offer real-time insights to improve operations. However, with no recent reviews or an overall rating, its actual performance remains unverified. Mews, in contrast, boasts over 750 reviews in the past six months and a near-perfect score of 99.5 out of 100, proving it’s trusted by a broad spectrum of hoteliers.
While FoxHis emphasizes AI-driven data, its lack of a modern interface or active user feedback suggests it’s less aligned with current hospitality technology standards. Mews, with its extensive feature set, active global presence, and proven track record, provides a more tangible and reliable solution. If you’re seeking a property management system backed by recent user experiences, which product should you trust?
If your hotel needs a scalable, reliable, and widely adopted PMS with strong customer support and a broad ecosystem of integrations, go with Mews. Its comprehensive features—over 59 unique functionalities, over 336 verified partners, and a track record of supporting diverse hotel types—make it a clear choice. It’s particularly well-suited for boutique, city-center, and hostel segments looking for ease of use and proven operational benefits.
If, however, your hotel is seeking an AI-centric management tool with a focus on guest feedback analysis and doesn’t mind a less proven platform, FoxHis might appeal. But with zero recent reviews, no rating, and only 20 employees, its capacity to deliver ongoing support or innovation remains uncertain. For a decision rooted in current, validated hotel management performance, Mews is the safer bet.
Mews’s user interface is rated 4.7 out of 5, based on extensive recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive design and ease of onboarding. Support ratings are 4.27 out of 5, with users highlighting quick setup and helpful customer service. FoxHis’s usability remains unassessed publicly, and its support ratings are absent, raising concerns about staff adoption and ongoing assistance.
Given Mews’s active support and proven ease of use, your team will likely spend less time training and troubleshooting. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an impressive 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated channel management, housekeping modules, and real-time analytics. FoxHis does not list any features explicitly, and reviews do not highlight any functional advantages, suggesting its offering may be limited or unverified.
Mews’s feature depth and breadth enable you to manage operations more effectively, accommodate diverse property types, and adapt to evolving guest expectations. FoxHis lacks recent, concrete feature validation. Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27 out of 5 for support, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, responsive service and a strong onboarding process. Users note that Mews’s support team actively resolves issues, including bugs, and offers comprehensive onboarding, which boosts user confidence.
FoxHis’s support quality is unknown, with no recent reviews or ratings available, making it risky to rely on for ongoing assistance. Given the importance of dependable support in PMS, Mews clearly leads. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ecosystem includes 336 verified partners, with integrations spanning revenue management, marketing, channel managers, POS systems, and more. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but the breadth and quality of Mews’s integrations are widely praised.
FoxHis’s partner count is zero, indicating limited or no integration capabilities, which could hinder operational flexibility. For a hotel needing seamless connectivity with existing tools, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a significant advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s ratings reflect a strong user consensus, with a 4.62 out of 5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Reviews praise its ease of use, support, and feature set across multiple hotel segments, especially boutique hotels and hostels.
FoxHis has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or compare experiences. Based on active, recent feedback, Mews is the preferred choice for hoteliers. Edge: Mews.
Mews charges $900 monthly, with no free tier or trial available, which might be considered a premium price for some properties. Pricing details for FoxHis are unavailable, adding uncertainty to the total cost of ownership.
Mews’s pricing is transparent but may be a significant investment for small properties. However, given its extensive features and active support, many hoteliers find it a worthwhile expense. Without clear pricing for FoxHis, Mews’s value proposition appears stronger.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in maturity and proven performance. Mews offers a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform with active customer support and a vast integration network, supporting hotels of all sizes worldwide. FoxHis presents an AI-driven concept with unverified recent user feedback and no listed features, making it a risky choice without clear proof of current functionality.
If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich PMS that’s actively used and recommended, Mews is the clear winner. It’s especially suitable if you prioritize support, integrations, and scalability.
Choose FoxHis only if you’re an innovative property willing to accept uncertainties and eager to explore AI-based guest insights. For most hotels aiming for operational stability and guest satisfaction today, Mews remains the more secure, validated choice.
In conclusion, Mews’s extensive recent reviews, high ratings, and proven track record make it the recommended option for your hotel. FoxHis, while intriguing as an AI concept, currently lacks the validation and support needed to confidently manage your property’s operations. Invest in a platform that’s trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide—your team and guests will thank you.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FoxHis and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Xi Ruan Westsoft |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FoxHis and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FoxHis offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FoxHis: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Xi Ruan Westsoft has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor