The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 441 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
FranklyView shines .
GuestRevu shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue Reporting and Reporting Dashboard.
Side-by-side ratings based on 441 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 441 |
After analyzing 441 verified reviews, FranklyView users most value its , while GuestRevu users highlight feedback and reporting, integration and compatibility, ai and automation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Feedback and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Compatibility
▾
|
|
|
+
AI and Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Dashboard and Interface
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Sentiment Analysis
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Reputation Management vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 161 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 179 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 20 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 19 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 198 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #1 199 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 91 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #2 37 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 37 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 111 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #2 17 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 3 reviews |
Choosing between FranklyView and GuestRevu hinges on your hotel’s specific reputation management needs. Both aim to improve guest feedback and online ratings but approach these goals differently. FranklyView mainly focuses on guest engagement and direct sales, while GuestRevu offers extensive review collection, analysis, and automation features. How do your priorities align with what each platform delivers?
FranklyView appears to target hotels that want to actively upsell, pre-arrival engagement, and post-stay feedback, whereas GuestRevu emphasizes review consolidation, sentiment analysis, and operational insights. Which features are more vital for your team right now?
FranklyView and GuestRevu both aim to boost online reputation, but their methods diverge. FranklyView emphasizes direct guest interaction through pre-registration, upselling, and targeted feedback, helping hotels build direct relationships and increase repeat bookings. GuestRevu, by contrast, centralizes reviews from platforms like TripAdvisor and Google, and automates sentiment analysis and response suggestions, making review management more efficient.
GuestRevu’s recent reviews are more plentiful and recent—over 80 reviews from the last six months—compared to no recent feedback for FranklyView, indicating more current user satisfaction. This makes GuestRevu more reliable for understanding how hotels feel about these tools today. Does your hotel need more direct guest engagement or review aggregation and analysis?
If your hotel needs a review-focused platform with extensive review collection, sentiment analysis, and operational insights, GuestRevu is the clear choice. It supports 40 verified integrations, a user rating of 4.61/5, and recent reviews praising its ease of use and helpful support.
Conversely, if your team prioritizes pre-arrival guest engagement, upselling, and post-stay feedback to drive direct bookings, FranklyView could be more suitable. However, given its lack of recent reviews and zero ratings, it’s difficult to gauge current functionality or customer satisfaction. For most hotels, GuestRevu’s recent high ratings and feature set make it the safer pick.
GuestRevu boasts a user rating of 4.63/5 and recent positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and simple setup. Users praise its dashboard, customizable surveys, and smooth onboarding, making it accessible even for teams with limited technical skills.
FranklyView, with a zero-star rating and no recent feedback, offers no data on ease of use. Based on available information, GuestRevu’s proven usability and high customer support scores strongly favor it. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu offers 31 unique features, including sentiment analysis, social media tools, revenue reporting, alerts, multi-property management, AI-generated responses, and more. These features enable comprehensive review management, guest insight, and operational automation.
FranklyView provides no additional features beyond its core guest feedback collection, upsell, and review boosting capabilities. It lacks the advanced analytics, automation, and social media tools that make GuestRevu more versatile. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s support ratings are high, with a 4.75/5 score and recent reviews praising their responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users mention that the team’s support has been instrumental in onboarding and ongoing use, making their platform easier to manage.
FranklyView has no recent ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess support quality. Based on current data, GuestRevu’s customer service is the clear leader. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs and property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Amadeus, and Criton. It covers a broad range of platforms, offering flexible, multi-channel review management.
FranklyView’s three verified integrations—none of which are recent or extensive—limit its connectivity. For comprehensive review and reputation management, GuestRevu significantly outperforms on integration options. Edge: GuestRevu.
With a recent review score of 4.61/5 and 386 reviews, GuestRevu consistently receives high marks across hotel segments, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Hotels in these segments praise its ease of use, customization, and support.
FranklyView has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on current data, GuestRevu's ratings reflect broader hotel trust and positive experiences. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu charges a straightforward $100/month, with no free tier or trial info available. FranklyView does not list any pricing details, implying that it may require custom quotes or that information is unavailable publicly.
Given GuestRevu’s transparent pricing and the lack of data for FranklyView, budget-conscious hotels should lean toward GuestRevu, unless FranklyView’s actual costs are favorable. Clear pricing favors GuestRevu.
Not ideal if you rely heavily on review monitoring or need extensive automation and social media tools.
Not ideal if you prefer a platform solely for upsell and pre-arrival engagement or have very limited budgets.
FranklyView offers targeted guest insights, upsell opportunities, and pre-arrival engagement but lacks recent reviews and detailed feature set evidence. It’s best suited for small hotels focused on direct bookings and operational feedback, provided you can verify its current effectiveness.
GuestRevu, with over 80 recent reviews and a 4.61/5 rating, stands out as a comprehensive reputation management solution. Its automation, integrations, and support make it a strong choice for most hotels looking to improve online reputation and guest satisfaction.
If you value recent user feedback, high ratings, and a rich feature set, GuestRevu is the clear leader. Its extensive integrations and proven support give your team the tools needed to manage reviews efficiently and effectively.
For hotels prioritizing review collection, sentiment analysis, and operational insights, GuestRevu is the recommended platform. If your focus is on direct guest engagement and upselling, investigate whether FranklyView’s current capabilities meet your needs — but proceed with caution given the lack of recent reviews.
Reputation Management pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FranklyView and GuestRevu share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Alerts & Notifications | ||
| Competitive Intelligence | ||
| Reporting Dashboard | ||
| Revenue Reporting | ||
| Sentiment Analysis | ||
| Social Media |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"GuestRevu has helped us so much over the past two years as we see our small business growing – the reviews from guests are like gold, and most of our bookings have been made becaus..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since implementing GuestRevu, our complaints have actually come down, because of the fact that we have so many repeat guests and now we can interact with them in much more detail...."
What hoteliers love
Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for serv... Users consistently highlight GuestRevu's detailed feedback collection and insightful reporting features, which provide actionable information for service enhancement and operational efficiency. The system's capacity to gather insights from multiple platforms enables hotels to quickly identify both strengths and areas needing improvement.
GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing r... GuestRevu integrates well with various systems, including renowned OTAs like Google, TripAdvisor, Booking.com, enhancing ease of use by centralizing review management. However, some users express a need for expanded integration options, including additional property management systems and direct connections to platforms like TripAdvisor to further streamline operations.
Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time a... Many reviewers appreciate the AI-driven analytics and automated response features of GuestRevu, which reduce manual effort and improve response time and consistency. While praised for efficiency, some users find AI-generated responses overly mechanical or lacking a personalized touch, suggesting room for refinement.
Where hoteliers push back
The platform's sentiment analysis is recognized for grouping feedback into useful categories, though it's reported as occasionally inaccurate. Users p... The platform's sentiment analysis is recognized for grouping feedback into useful categories, though it's reported as occasionally inaccurate. Users point out issues with the sentiment algorithm misinterpreting tone, especially sarcasm, impacting the clarity of automated insights.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FranklyView and GuestRevu share many core Reputation Management features, but each has unique capabilities. FranklyView offers 3 verified integration partners, while GuestRevu offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. GuestRevu leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FranklyView: No. GuestRevu: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Reputation Management vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. FranklyView has an HT Score of 0 and GuestRevu has 96. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor