The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Front2Go shines .
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 47 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Front2Go users most value its , while Infor users highlight ease of use, reporting, integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Front2Go |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #44 8 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #25 24 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #19 9 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #24 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #28 24 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #23 26 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #29 8 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #31 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #22 20 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #24 17 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #28 1 reviews |
Choosing between Front2Go by Front2Go and Infor HMS by Infor hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both are property management systems (PMS), but they serve very different market segments and offer contrasting features, support, and user experiences. Your team must evaluate what matters most: recent reviews and proven performance or niche capabilities and integrations.
Front2Go has zero reviews and a score of 0/5, indicating no recent or verified customer feedback. In contrast, Infor HMS boasts 46 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.04/5, making it the more credible and tested option. Do you prioritize a product with proven user satisfaction or are you exploring an untested system?
Front2Go appears to be a less established or less reviewed PMS, with no recent reviews and no scores on key metrics. Its absence of features, integrations, and market presence suggests it’s still emerging or lacks broad deployment. On the other hand, Infor HMS is a mature, cloud-based platform with a robust feature set, including housekeeping, revenue management, and guest CRM, supported by 113 verified partners and regional presence in 13 countries.
Where Front2Go might appeal is if your hotel prioritizes a simplified or specialized solution, but its lack of recent customer feedback makes it difficult to assess real-world performance. Infor’s comprehensive suite and recent reviews demonstrate its reliability. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a full-featured, scalable PMS capable of handling complex operations, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It suits mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and brands looking for extensive integrations, detailed reporting, and multiple modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and CRM.
Conversely, if your hotel operates on a very limited scale or requires a lightweight, perhaps more niche solution, Front2Go could be considered—though its lack of recent feedback questions its viability. For most hotels seeking proven performance and reliable support, Infor offers a safer, more comprehensive investment.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and short onboarding time—users mention it “was easy to understand” and “short onboarding process.” Support responsiveness is also highlighted positively, with many reviews citing “prompt and professional” assistance.
Front2Go, however, scores 0/5 on ease of use, with no reviews to substantiate its user interface or onboarding experience. Given its nonexistent recent feedback, we cannot assess its usability. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including housekeeping modules, online support, guest profiles, multi-lingual and multi-currency capabilities, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features are well-documented through numerous reviews, emphasizing their importance for operational efficiency.
In contrast, Front2Go has no features listed or verified, suggesting it lacks key PMS functionalities. Without concrete features or reviews, Infor clearly outperforms Front2Go. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS receives consistent praise for its responsiveness, with a review highlighting “support team’s professionalism and quick replies,” rated 4.04/5 overall support score. Customers mention that support “guides through issues effectively,” which is critical during busy periods.
Front2Go, with no recent reviews available, provides no evidence of support quality. Its support reputation remains unknown, making Infor the safer choice. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including booking channels (Expedia, Booking.com), revenue tools, and payment systems. Shared or unique integrations bolster its ability to connect with operational systems, reducing manual work and errors.
Front2Go offers no verified integrations, limiting its functionality and flexibility. For hotels relying on robust third-party integrations, Infor clearly leads. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and an overall rating of 4.04/5, hoteliers clearly favor Infor HMS. Users from diverse segments, including independent hotels and brands, generally rate it highly, emphasizing its feature set and support.
Front2Go has no reviews, so there’s no rating data to consider. Until any feedback appears, we must consider Infor the more trusted and endorsed option. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, indicating they likely require direct vendor contact for quotes. Many enterprise PMS solutions operate on custom pricing models based on hotel size and needs, so expect negotiations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS provides a full-featured, well-supported PMS with proven recent reviews, high user satisfaction, and extensive integrations. Its suite is suited for hotels that want automation, detailed insights, and reliable support, making it a solid choice for mid to large properties.
Front2Go, with no recent reviews, offers little evidence of its capabilities or support quality. It might appeal to very small or specialized hotels seeking a basic solution, but without proven performance or features, it’s a risky investment.
In most cases, especially if your hotel values proven software backed by recent feedback, Infor HMS is the recommended choice. Its extensive features, regional coverage, and positive user ratings make it the more dependable and scalable solution.
According to HTR's product database, Front2Go and Infor HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Front2Go and Infor HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Front2Go offers 0 verified integration partners, while Infor HMS offers 113. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Front2Go: No. Infor HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Front2Go has an HT Score of 0 and Infor has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor