The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Front2Go shines .
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Front2Go users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Front2Go |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing between Front2Go and protel PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Front2Go offers a simplified customer feedback platform, while protel PMS provides a comprehensive property management system with extensive integrations. Both aim to streamline operations, but their core functionalities and user experiences differ significantly. To make an informed decision, consider your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth plans.
Front2Go is designed primarily for customer feedback management, focusing on analyzing guest sentiments and collecting reviews. It helps your team improve service quality through AI-driven insights but doesn’t manage reservations, billing, or operations. Conversely, protel PMS is a full-fledged property management system that handles bookings, billing, housekeeping, and revenue management. Do you need a feedback tool or a comprehensive management platform?
Since Front2Go has no reviews or recent data, it’s difficult to gauge its real-world performance or user satisfaction. In contrast, protel PMS has over 105 recent reviews, with a high overall rating of 4.11/5 and an 80% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong user confidence. Given this data, protel’s larger support network and established presence make it the more proven choice.
If your hotel requires a robust PMS capable of managing complex operations, extensive integrations, and automating workflows, protel PMS is the clear choice. It’s best suited for hotels with multiple properties, diverse revenue streams, or plans for growth, thanks to its broad feature set and global support.
On the other hand, if your team needs a straightforward platform to gather and analyze guest feedback to enhance service quality, Front2Go might seem appealing. However, since no recent reviews or scores are available, the practical effectiveness of Front2Go remains unverified. For hotels seeking reliable, scalable solutions, protel PMS offers a proven track record.
Protel PMS boasts a high user rating of 4.12/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Many users highlight how easy it is for staff to find and use features, citing quick learning curves and efficient daily management. Support response times are generally acceptable, though some users mention room for improvement.
In stark contrast, Front2Go has no available ratings or reviews, which makes assessing its usability impossible. Given the extensive feedback on protel’s user experience and high satisfaction levels, Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS offers over 46 features, including revenue management, multi-currency support, booking engine, guest CRM, integrated payments, and detailed reporting. Many of these features are designed to automate tasks, improve revenue, and streamline guest management, making it a full-stack solution for hoteliers.
Front2Go has no listed features or comparable functionalities, focusing solely on customer feedback analysis. Without specific features to compare, it’s clear that protel PMS provides a far more comprehensive toolset. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS has a customer support rating of 3.95/5, with reviews mentioning helpful staff and responsive service, though some cite delays. Hoteliers appreciate its 24/7 multilingual assistance, critical for maintaining smooth operations across regions.
With no reviews or support ratings available for Front2Go, it’s impossible to assess its support quality. Given protel’s established reputation for support, Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS integrates with over 1,200 hospitality systems, including major channel managers, revenue tools, and guest apps. Its extensive ecosystem enables hotels to connect essential systems smoothly and scale operations efficiently.
Front2Go has no verified integration partners, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel technology. For hotels needing a flexible, interconnected system, Edge: protel PMS.
With over 105 recent reviews, protel PMS’s high rating of 4.11/5 and an 80% recommendation rate clearly reflect strong user satisfaction. Hotels of all sizes, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its reliability, feature set, and support.
Front2Go lacks recent reviews, making a comparison impossible. Based on available data, Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS has a transparent starting price of $500 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its comprehensive feature set. Front2Go’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or less transparent.
Given the clear pricing structure for protel PMS and its proven value, it’s the more predictable investment. Edge: protel PMS.
Protel PMS is a comprehensive property management system with a proven track record, extensive features, and reliable support. Its large user base, high recent ratings, and broad integrations make it a solid investment for hotels aiming to modernize and scale.
Front2Go, on the other hand, appears to be a basic guest feedback tool, with no recent reviews or detailed features, making it a less established option. Unless your hotel’s primary goal is reputation management and guest sentiment analysis, protel PMS clearly offers more value.
If your hotel needs a full management platform capable of supporting growth and automation, choose protel PMS. For hotels focused solely on guest feedback, consider Front2Go, but verify its performance with a trial or demo first.
According to HTR's product database, Front2Go and protel PMS (by Planet) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Front2Go and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Front2Go offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Front2Go: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Front2Go has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor