The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Front2Go shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Front2Go users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Front2Go |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically affect your hotel's operations, guest experience, and bottom line. Front2Go by Front2Go and RMS by RMS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. While Front2Go’s absence of recent reviews and minimal rating data make it difficult to assess, RMS’s well-documented strengths and active user base make it the clear leader. Are you ready to pick the solution that will elevate your hotel?
Both Front2Go and RMS claim to optimize hotel management, but RMS’s extensive feature set and recent reviews suggest a more mature platform. Front2Go, with no reviews or recent data, offers no clear evidence of its performance or usability, making RMS the more reliable choice. RMS’s review count of 293, with 20 recent reviews in the last six months, provides current insights into its strengths and weaknesses. Do you want a platform with proven, current performance, or are you willing to gamble on an unreviewed system?
If your hotel requires a full-featured PMS with integrated channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, and robust support, RMS is the clear choice. Its platform suits mid-sized to large hotels, resorts, and properties with complex needs. Conversely, if your hotel is small, looking for a simple management tool, and willing to accept uncertain support and features, Front2Go might seem appealing—though the lack of recent reviews and features makes this risky. RMS’s proven track record and comprehensive offerings make it the safer, more scalable pick.
RMS scores a 4.28/5 for ease of use, with users praising its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support staff. RMS’s review quotes highlight its intuitive booking chart and helpful customer service, with many praising the fast response times and support quality. Front2Go, with no reviews or ratings, offers no data on user experience, but the absence of evidence suggests it may lack the polish or usability found in RMS. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 74 features, including integrated CRS, online support, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, group booking, payment processing, and more. It also offers advanced modules like automated night audits, multi-lingual support, and guest messaging, far surpassing Front2Go’s zero features. Front2Go provides no feature set or integrations, which severely limits its utility for hotels seeking a comprehensive platform. RMS’s extensive feature list caters to complex operations and growth. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support is highly rated at 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its helpfulness and prompt assistance. Quotes from users mention “very helpful support staff” and “proactive service,” indicating a high level of customer satisfaction. Front2Go’s lack of reviews means there’s no data on its support quality, making RMS the safer bet for reliable help when needed. Given the importance of support in hotel management, RMS’s support edge is decisive. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers 112 verified integrations, including popular partners like Criton, Sage, STR, and Unifocus, providing extensive connectivity for property operations, revenue, and distribution. Front2Go, with zero verified partners, severely limits flexibility and connectivity. Without integrations, Front2Go cannot connect with key tools like POS, channel managers, or payment systems, whereas RMS’s integrations enable seamless operations across platforms. Edge: RMS.
RMS holds a 4.56/5 overall rating from 293 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, feature depth, and support. Hotels of all segments, including resorts, boutique hotels, and motels, rate RMS highly, with many reviews praising its scalability and reliability. Front2Go’s blank review profile makes comparison impossible, but RMS’s active, recent reviews and high ratings reflect stronger user satisfaction. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s pricing is set at $800.00 per month, with no free tier or trial available, which is typical for comprehensive PMS platforms. Front2Go’s pricing details are unavailable, and with no reviews or features, assessing its value is impossible. Given RMS’s proven features and active support, its price reflects its capabilities and market presence. Without data, Front2Go’s value remains uncertain.
The core difference lies in their market presence, features, and support: RMS provides a comprehensive, well-supported platform with verified integrations and recent reviews, while Front2Go offers no data or evidence of performance. For hoteliers looking for stability, extensive features, and ongoing support, RMS is the clear winner.
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS capable of handling complex operations and supporting growth, RMS’s advantages are clear. Its higher ratings, recent reviews, and broad integrations make it the better choice for most hotels today.
Choose RMS if you want a platform that has been tested, trusted, and actively supported, ensuring your property can operate smoothly and scale with confidence. Front2Go’s lack of recent reviews and features make it a risky choice—better to invest in a platform with proven results.
In summary: RMS offers a robust suite of features, active user support, and recent positive reviews, making it the dependable choice for your hotel’s management needs. Front2Go, lacking recent data and features, is unlikely to meet the demands of modern hospitality operations.
According to HTR's product database, Front2Go and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Front2Go |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Front2Go and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Front2Go offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Front2Go: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Front2Go has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor