The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 160 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GMS Felix shines .
Preno shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 160 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 160 |
After analyzing 160 verified reviews, GMS Felix users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing between GMS Felix and Preno hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. GMS Felix, a property management system that has been around for some time, offers a broad automation focus but lacks recent reviews, overall ratings, and user feedback. Preno, by contrast, is a cloud-based hotel management platform with a proven track record, more recent reviews, and a high user recommendation rate. Are you looking for a well-rated, actively supported system with extensive features? Or is a more untested, less reviewed solution sufficient?
GMS Felix aims to serve property managers and owners who need a centralized system for multiple properties, but it currently has no publicly available reviews or recent user feedback, casting doubt on its ongoing support and innovation. Preno, with over 144 reviews—including 1 in the last six months—and a 4.73/5 overall rating, is clearly a more trusted option for hoteliers. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s operational needs and growth plans?
Both GMS Felix and Preno claim to streamline hotel operations by automating routine tasks, but they diverge sharply in maturity and user confidence. GMS Felix is marketed as a comprehensive property management system for managing multiple properties, with features like maintenance tracking and lease management, yet it lacks recent reviews and a significant user base. Preno, however, is a cloud-based platform built explicitly for hoteliers, with a strong emphasis on operational simplicity and guest experience, supported by recent, positive feedback.
Preno's recent reviews highlight its ease of use, integration capabilities, and support responsiveness, with 95% of users likely to recommend it. GMS Felix’s absence of recent reviews and the zero review count suggest it is either inactive or lacks recent customer engagement. Given the data, Preno’s active presence and recent positive sentiment make it the clearer choice for hotels seeking reliable, ongoing support.
If your hotel manages multiple properties and prioritizes a system with a large, recent user community, Preno is the clear winner. Its 144 reviews and 4.73/5 rating demonstrate a proven track record, especially among boutique hotels and motels, where it is most popular. For hotels that need a straightforward, cloud-based solution with integrated channel management, billing, and guest communication, Preno offers a comprehensive set of features.
GMS Felix, on the other hand, might appeal to property managers with specific legacy needs or those seeking a system that claims broad automation but lacks recent validation. If your hotel requires a system with extensive property management features, and you are comfortable with unverified support or ongoing development, GMS Felix could be considered. However, the lack of recent feedback makes Preno the more dependable option for most hotels.
Preno’s user interface has received high praise across reviews, with a 4.78/5 ease of use score and numerous comments about its intuitive design. Users appreciate its straightforward navigation, helpful onboarding, and support team’s responsiveness, which makes staff adoption smoother. GMS Felix, in contrast, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, and no recent reviews suggest that its interface has been tested or improved recently.
Given that Preno’s platform is cloud-based and designed with hotel staff in mind, it has a significant edge in usability. Your team will likely find Preno easier to learn, implement, and operate daily. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s platform boasts 30 features, including payment processing, guest CRM, revenue management, booking engine, integrated channel management, and mobile app support. It also offers automated night audits, real-time status updates, and targeted marketing tools. GMS Felix, by contrast, claims to be a comprehensive system but offers no specific features or modules, making it impossible to evaluate its capabilities.
Preno’s detailed feature set and active development reflect a platform that addresses various operational needs. GMS Felix’s lack of available features and reviews leaves its offerings unverified. Edge: Preno.
Preno’s customer support has a 4.8/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing helpful, prompt, and friendly service. Many users mention support staff guiding them through onboarding and troubleshooting, with comments like “the support team took me through whatever I could not work out,” and “service is brilliant.” GMS Felix, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no data on support quality.
Given the recent, high-rated customer support experience, Preno clearly has the advantage. Your hotel staff will likely find Preno’s support more responsive and reassuring during setup and ongoing use. Edge: Preno.
Preno integrates with 17 verified partners, including Xero, SiteMinder, Revinate, TrustYou, and Zingle, allowing extensive connectivity with accounting, channel management, and guest communication tools. GMS Felix offers no listed integrations or verified partners, significantly limiting its interoperability.
For hotels that rely on multiple third-party tools to operate efficiently, Preno’s integrations are a key benefit. The lack of integration options in GMS Felix diminishes its suitability for modern, tech-enabled hotels. Edge: Preno.
Since GMS Felix has no recent reviews or ratings, it cannot be rated by hoteliers, making Preno the clear leader. Preno’s 144 reviews, a 4.73/5 overall score, and a 9.53/10 NPS score demonstrate strong, consistent user satisfaction. Reviews cite ease of use, support quality, and features like channel management and billing as major positives.
Hotels across segments, especially boutique hotels and motels, rate Preno highly, with many praising its simplicity and support. The absence of data for GMS Felix makes Preno the more trusted choice. Edge: Preno.
GMS Felix does not publicly list pricing or trial options, implying it may have custom quotes or less transparent pricing. Preno costs $800 upfront with no ongoing subscription fee, which is straightforward and transparent.
Since Preno’s flat-rate pricing is clear, your hotel can easily evaluate the ROI. The lack of public pricing for GMS Felix leaves uncertainty about its value proposition. Edge: Preno.
Not ideal if:
GMS Felix could work if your operation is highly specialized and you’re comfortable with limited recent validation.
Not ideal if:
Preno suits hotels aiming for efficiency, ease of use, and strong support.
GMS Felix presents as a traditional property management system with a broad automation promise, but it currently lacks recent validation and user feedback. Its absence of reviews and features suggests it may be inactive or unsuitable for today's hotel operations.
Preno, with a current high user rating, active support, extensive integrations, and a proven feature set, remains the more reliable choice. Its recent positive reviews confirm that it continues to meet hotelier needs effectively. If you prioritize support, usability, and proven performance, Preno is the recommended option.
If your hotel needs a robust, cloud-based PMS with a large user base and ongoing development, go with Preno. For niche, legacy, or multi-property management needs, GMS Felix may be considered, but only if supported by further validation.
According to HTR's product database, GMS and Preno share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GMS and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GMS: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GMS Felix has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor