The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GODO shines , with exclusive features like Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, GODO users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can dramatically impact your operations, guest experiences, and revenue. GODO and RMS are both designed to streamline hotel management, but they differ greatly in features, user reviews, and market presence. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a more straightforward, niche solution or an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations and capabilities.
GODO offers a simple, dedicated vacation rental tool, while RMS provides a broad, feature-rich platform popular among larger hotels and resorts. Which aligns better with your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth goals?
GODO was founded in Iceland in 2012 and caters primarily to vacation rentals and smaller properties, emphasizing automation and centralization of vacation management. RMS, established in 1983 and headquartered in San Diego, serves over 7,000 businesses worldwide, supporting hotels of all sizes with a comprehensive suite of features.
While GODO has a limited feature set and no recent reviews, RMS’s recent data is far more substantial, with 293 reviews and a high overall rating of 4.56/5. RMS’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, robust support, and extensive integrations, making it a more proven solution for hotels seeking scalability.
Do you need a simple solution for vacation rentals, or a robust platform that can scale across multiple property types?
If your hotel operates in the hospitality industry beyond vacation rentals or is looking for a system that integrates well with various operational tools, RMS is the better choice. Its extensive feature set—including revenue management, guest CRM, integrated CRS, and multi-lingual/multi-currency support—serves larger, more complex hotels and resorts well.
However, if your property focuses solely on vacation rentals or small-scale operations, GODO’s streamlined approach could suffice. Its core strength lies in automation and simplicity, which may appeal to property managers who want quick setup and minimal complexity.
In short, choose RMS if you need a scalable, full-featured platform. Opt for GODO if your needs are niche and straightforward.
Based on recent reviews, RMS scores 4.28/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive booking chart, quick onboarding, and helpful support staff. Many users comment on its straightforward interface, with one noting, “Very user-friendly software,” and another saying, “It was the easiest onboarding process I’ve had of any system.”
GODO, however, has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its usability. Given RMS’s high customer satisfaction and recent feedback, it clearly has the edge in user-friendliness and onboarding.
Edge: RMS
RMS offers 41 features, including integrated CRS, revenue management, guest CRM, digital registration, online check-in, POS integration, and more. Its extensive feature set supports complex hotel operations, automation, and guest engagement, providing more tools to maximize revenue and streamline operations.
GODO provides only one unique feature: a drag-and-drop tape chart. While this may be useful for some niche users, it lacks the broad capabilities found in RMS. RMS’s features are more aligned with the needs of larger hotels and resorts.
Edge: RMS
RMS’s support ratings stand at 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its responsive and knowledgeable team. One reviewer states, “Support is proactive and helpful,” and another appreciated the quick responses from staff.
GODO has no recent reviews or ratings, so its support quality cannot be reliably assessed. RMS’s consistently high scores and recent positive feedback give it a clear support advantage.
Edge: RMS
RMS integrates with 112 verified partners, including popular tools like Criton, Sage, Net Affinity, and STR, covering property trust accounting, channel management, revenue tools, and more. GODO, with only 5 verified partners, offers limited integration options, primarily with OTA and basic property management tools.
For hotels seeking a connected ecosystem, RMS’s extensive integrations support broader operational needs, while GODO’s narrower focus may restrict growth.
Edge: RMS
Since GODO has no recent reviews, its rating is unreliable. RMS’s recent reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction, with an overall rating of 4.56/5 from 293 reviews, many from hotels, resorts, and larger properties.
RMS’s high review count and recent positive feedback make it the stronger choice for hoteliers valuing proven performance and current user experiences.
Edge: RMS
GODO’s pricing is listed at $1,100 per month, with no trial or freemium options. RMS costs $800 per month, also without trial or freemium, but its lower price point combined with more features presents better value.
Given RMS’s more extensive capabilities, its price offers more bang for your buck.
Edge: RMS
Not ideal if your property requires sophisticated revenue management, multi-property management, or extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely as a small vacation rental or prefers a no-frills, simplified system.
RMS is a full-featured, scalable platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high customer ratings. Its broad capabilities support complex hotel operations and growth, making it the better choice for most mid-sized and larger properties.
GODO offers a niche, automation-focused solution suited for small, vacation rental properties or boutique hotels that want simplicity and quick setup. It’s a less proven option with limited features and support transparency, making RMS the recommended choice for most hotels seeking reliable, comprehensive management.
If you need a robust, scalable system with ongoing support and integrations, RMS is the clear winner. For small-scale, straightforward management, GODO could work, but its lack of recent reviews and features makes it a riskier investment.
According to HTR's product database, GODO and RMS share 33 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 30 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GODO and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GODO offers 5 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GODO: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GODO has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor