The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 251 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GraceSoft shines in customer support and onboarding , with exclusive features like Website Development and Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.
RMS shines when it comes to support team , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 251 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $700/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 5 | 246 |
After analyzing 251 verified reviews, GraceSoft users most value its , while RMS users highlight support team, user interface, operational streamlining. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Streamlining
▾
|
|
|
+
OTA and Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #36 3 reviews | #6 124 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #6 83 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #12 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 7 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #35 2 reviews | #6 79 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #32 3 reviews | #8 39 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 2 reviews | #7 38 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #34 0 reviews | #5 52 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #24 1 reviews | #9 56 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #33 1 reviews | #13 16 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #17 2 reviews | #11 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 1 reviews |
When choosing hotel management software, your team needs a solution that simplifies operations, boosts revenue, and delivers reliable support. Both Easy Innkeeping by GraceSoft and RMS aim to meet these needs but approach the challenge differently. Easy Innkeeping focuses on small to midsized properties with straightforward reservation and CRM tools, while RMS offers a broader, more integrated system designed for multi-property management and advanced automation. Which software best aligns with your hotel’s scale and complexity?
Both platforms aim to streamline daily hotel operations, but their strengths and limitations differ. Easy Innkeeping’s simplicity and lower price point appeal to smaller properties, yet its limited features may constrain growth. RMS’s extensive features and integrations support larger or expanding hotels but come with a higher price and complexity. Are you ready to explore which system is the right fit for your property?
Easy Innkeeping offers an intuitive, user-friendly interface designed for smaller hotels, inns, cabins, and vacation rentals. RMS, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive platform capable of managing multiple properties with complex needs, including revenue management and extensive integrations. RMS’s 224 reviews and recent positive feedback give it a clear advantage in reliability and ongoing support, whereas GraceSoft’s minimal reviews and lack of recent activity suggest limited current user confidence.
Both products handle reservations and guest communication, but RMS’s broader feature set makes it more suitable for hotels with growing or multiple properties. Easy Innkeeping’s cloud-only approach may be limiting for properties with unreliable internet or those requiring offline access. Would your hotel benefit from RMS’s advanced automation and multi-property tools, or is simplicity enough?
If your hotel needs a straightforward reservation system with good CRM capabilities at an affordable price, Easy Innkeeping is a logical choice. Its ease of use and strong onboarding make it ideal for small properties or boutique inns with limited technical resources. Conversely, RMS suits hotels or groups managing multiple locations, requiring features like revenue management, channel management, and integrated POS.
For properties focused on growth, automation, and detailed reporting, RMS’s extensive feature set and 112 verified integrations provide significant advantages. If budget is a primary constraint, Easy Innkeeping’s lower price point ($300/month) is compelling. Which features matter most to your team—simplicity or scale?
Ease of use is a critical factor, and GraceSoft scores slightly higher at 4.4/5 for usability, with a strong onboarding rating of 4.67/5. Its interface is designed to be accessible for users with limited technical experience, and support staff is praised for their responsiveness. RMS’s user rating of 4.3/5 is also high, with recent reviews emphasizing the system’s intuitiveness despite its broad capabilities.
Both platforms have their learning curves, but RMS’s extensive features may require more training. The most recent RMS reviews highlight its ease of onboarding and helpful support, making it suitable for larger teams ready to adopt more complex systems. Edge: Easy Innkeeping.
RMS offers 28 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, revenue management, integrated CRS, guest CRM, booking engine, digital registration, and more. These functionalities enable multi-property management, improved automation, and guest engagement. Easy Innkeeping provides only 2 unique features—website development and a drag-and-drop tapechart—focusing on reservation and guest management.
While RMS’s broad feature set is impressive, Easy Innkeeping’s simplicity might be enough for smaller properties. However, RMS’s 46 shared features—including basic reservation and reporting tools—cover most hotel management needs. For advanced automation and extensive integrations, RMS clearly leads. Edge: RMS.
GraceSoft’s customer support scores a perfect 5/5, with reviews praising the team’s availability and courteous assistance. Users highlight how support staff promptly resolve issues, especially aesthetic and usability concerns. RMS support, rated at 4.52/5, is also well-regarded, with reviewers noting helpful responses but occasional delays, especially during system updates.
Both platforms provide solid assistance, but RMS’s larger user base and recent reviews demonstrate ongoing commitment to support. GraceSoft’s small customer base limits feedback but suggests personalized service. Edge: Easy Innkeeping.
RMS boasts 112 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and channel management tools like Criton, Sage, and STR. Shared integrations are unavailable, but RMS’s extensive partner network supports multi-channel distribution and revenue optimization. GraceSoft, with no verified integrations, relies on manual or limited connections, restricting automation.
If your hotel depends on multiple OTA integrations, RMS’s ecosystem offers significant advantages. Easy Innkeeping’s lack of verified integrations may limit growth and operational efficiency. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5 is based on 224 recent reviews, with properties of all sizes praising its automation, revenue management, and multi-property capabilities. Conversely, GraceSoft’s 0/5 rating stems from a single outdated review, providing no recent data or user feedback to support its efficacy. The difference in review volume and recency makes RMS the clear leader.
Hotels of varying types, especially those managing multiple locations or seeking advanced features, rate RMS higher for functionality and support. For small properties, RMS’s complexity might be a challenge, but overall, RMS’s recent reviews endorse its value. Edge: RMS.
Easy Innkeeping’s flat rate of $300/month offers an affordable option for small hotels, inns, and vacation rentals. RMS charges $700/month, reflecting its broader feature set and multi-property management capabilities. Neither platform offers a free tier, and additional costs for integrations or extras may apply.
Budget-conscious properties may prefer Easy Innkeeping, but larger hotels or groups investing in automation and scalability will find RMS’s higher price justified by its extensive features. Which budget aligns with your property’s growth plans?
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
RMS is a comprehensive, all-in-one platform designed for hotels seeking automation, multi-property management, and extensive integrations. Its 86.37 HTR score and 4.56/5 review rating, backed by 224 recent reviews, demonstrate strong market confidence. Easy Innkeeping, with only 5 reviews and no recent activity, is limited in scope but may appeal to very small properties or those prioritizing simplicity.
If your hotel needs advanced features, automation, and scalability, RMS offers clear advantages. If you manage a small property with minimal complexity and a tight budget, Easy Innkeeping might suffice—though the latter’s lack of recent reviews makes RMS the safer bet. In today’s competitive landscape, RMS’s proven track record makes it the more reliable choice for growth-focused hoteliers.
According to HTR's product database, Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) and RMS share 46 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Website Development |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The support team receives high praise for their responsiveness and problem-solving skills. Clients value their proactive approach to addressing issues... The support team receives high praise for their responsiveness and problem-solving skills. Clients value their proactive approach to addressing issues and assistance in system navigation.
RMS Cloud is recognized for its user-friendly interface, facilitating ease of use and reducing training time for staff. This simplification is critica... RMS Cloud is recognized for its user-friendly interface, facilitating ease of use and reducing training time for staff. This simplification is critical to efficient operations, especially in fast-paced environments.
RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users apprec... RMS Cloud significantly streamlines hotel operations by integrating multiple aspects such as reservations, housekeeping, and maintenance. Users appreciate its role in enabling real-time coordination among various departments, thereby enhancing efficiency and guest experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users highlight the platform's customization features, allowing them to adjust check-in procedures and other operations to better fit their speci... Many users highlight the platform's customization features, allowing them to adjust check-in procedures and other operations to better fit their specific needs. However, some reviews mention the need for enhancements to report customization.
While RMS Cloud offers a variety of reports, users note difficulties in report customization and accessing certain settings. Enhancements in this area... While RMS Cloud offers a variety of reports, users note difficulties in report customization and accessing certain settings. Enhancements in this area could simplify generating actionable insights for decision-making.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) and RMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 4.3/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ): No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GraceSoft has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 87. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor