The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 44 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hilton shines .
Redforts shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 44 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 43 |
After analyzing 44 verified reviews, Hilton users most value its , while Redforts users highlight ease of use and intuitive system, reservation management, customer service. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive system
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer service
▾
|
|
|
+
Continuous improvement and innovation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface and design improvements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #31 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) | — | #49 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #52 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #30 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #39 5 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #56 1 reviews | #49 2 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #37 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #40 1 reviews | #32 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #14 39 reviews |
Choosing between Hilton OnQ and Redforts hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but their approaches, features, and user experiences differ sharply. Hilton OnQ, a proprietary solution from a global hotel chain, is built in-house and primarily serves Hilton properties. Conversely, Redforts is an independent, all-in-one management platform catering to various property types, from hostels to boutique hotels.
Your team needs to evaluate whether a bespoke, industry-specific system or a flexible, multi-functional platform better fits your current scale, budget, and modernization goals. Which system will truly support your property's growth and operational ease?
Hilton OnQ is tailored for Hilton’s extensive network, offering a familiar environment for properties within that brand. Its core focus is on centralized operations, reservations, and guest management across Hilton’s global footprint, ensuring consistency and integration with the Hilton ecosystem.
Redforts, however, has a review score of 72.88 compared to Hilton’s zero, with 40 recent reviews demonstrating active, current user engagement. Its reviews highlight high ease of use (4.68/5), excellent customer support (4.53/5), and a 95% likelihood to recommend, contrasting sharply with Hilton’s minimal ratings and only one review.
Given the stark difference, Redforts appears more relevant and adaptable for independent hotels. Are you looking for a system that actively improves your daily operations and customer satisfaction? If so, Redforts likely outperforms Hilton OnQ in practical, real-world hotel management.
If your hotel needs an easy-to-use, highly rated platform with ongoing support and modern features, go with Redforts. Its broad module set (over 46 features) and positive recent reviews suggest it can adapt to various property types, especially boutique hotels, hostels, and small to mid-sized properties.
If your hotel is part of the Hilton brand or seeks a system built specifically for Hilton’s internal operations, then Hilton OnQ might seem logical. However, its reviews reveal persistent issues such as outdated technology and a lack of recent user feedback, indicating it’s not suitable for independent hotels or those seeking innovation.
For most hotels outside Hilton’s ecosystem, Redforts’ comprehensive, customer-centric approach makes it the better choice. Its versatility and recent positive user experiences outperform Hilton's limited, obsolete technology.
Redforts is rated 4.68/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitiveness and straightforward management tools. Users find it simple to learn, reducing staff training time and human error, which streamlines daily operations.
Hilton OnQ, with a rating of just 1/5 for ease of use, is described as outdated and cumbersome, often requiring significant support to navigate. Its interface seems to have remained static since the 1990s, leading many users to spend excessive hours troubleshooting rather than serving guests.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts offers a rich suite of 46 features, including revenue and rate management, online check-in, integrated CRM, digital registration, electronic ID scanning, and a mobile app. Many features, such as automated reminders, guest messaging, and real-time reporting, are designed for operational efficiency.
Hilton OnQ, in contrast, offers no unique features beyond basic property management functions, with no detailed feature list available. The limited functional scope and outdated tech make it less competitive.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts boasts a 4.53/5 support rating, with reviews emphasizing prompt, friendly, and effective assistance. Clients mention that Jan and his team consistently improve the system, keeping pace with evolving hotel needs.
Hilton OnQ’s support rating is a dismal 1/5, with reviews expressing frustration over poor responsiveness and technical issues that remain unresolved. The extensive time spent troubleshooting indicates weak support and outdated infrastructure.
Edge: Redforts.
Hilton OnQ integrates with 6 verified partners, including Impulsify and Canary Technologies, mainly within Hilton’s ecosystem. Its integration ecosystem appears limited to Hilton-specific vendors.
Redforts has 2 verified integrations—WuBook and Mr Winston—but with a growing list of partner modules. Its platform allows flexible integration with booking engines, channel managers, and POS systems, aiding operational cohesion.
While Hilton’s integrations are constrained within its own environment, Redforts offers a broader, more adaptable set of integrations, facilitating smoother external and internal communication.
Edge: Redforts.
Redforts’ review score of 72.88 with 40 reviews indicates strong, recent validation from active users. Its users—from boutique hotels to hostels—rate it highly, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
Hilton OnQ’s single review and ratings of 0/5 reflect a lack of recent, meaningful feedback. Its outdated technology and support issues suggest it’s not favored by independent hoteliers seeking modern solutions.
Based on current reviews, Redforts clearly garners higher satisfaction ratings.
Edge: Redforts.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely bundled into Hilton’s broader corporate infrastructure. For independent hoteliers, this lack of transparent pricing makes budgeting difficult.
Redforts costs $500 per month, with no implementation fees or trial options. This transparent, predictable pricing offers better value for small to mid-sized properties seeking an all-in-one management solution.
If budget transparency and affordability matter to your hotel, Redforts presents a clear advantage.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Redforts is a versatile, user-rated, feature-rich platform suited for a wide array of independent and small properties. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, support, and broad functionality, making it a practical choice for hotels seeking modernization.
Hilton OnQ, a proprietary system aimed at Hilton’s franchise properties, suffers from outdated technology, poor support, and limited features. Its lack of recent reviews and user dissatisfaction suggest it’s not suitable for independent hoteliers or those wanting to innovate.
For most hotels outside Hilton’s ecosystem, Redforts is the pragmatic, well-supported solution. Hilton OnQ’s utility is confined mainly within Hilton’s own properties, and it’s not recommended for the broader hotel management market.
Note: The analysis relies on current review data, emphasizing recent user experiences and satisfaction metrics. Hilton OnQ’s minimal recent feedback and poor ratings strongly favor Redforts as the more reliable, modern choice.
According to HTR's product database, Hilton OnQ and Redforts share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freein... Many users appreciate Redforts for its intuitive design, which simplifies training and reduces human errors. This streamlines daily operations, freeing up staff for other tasks.
The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and cha... The system excels at managing reservations, preventing overbooking, and integrating with multiple platforms. Customization for booking engines and channel management is also highlighted as a significant strength.
The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributi... The attentive and responsive customer service is frequently applauded. Users mention personal communication and quick resolution of issues, contributing to an overall positive experience.
Where hoteliers push back
Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capabili... Redforts integrates efficiently with booking engines, channel managers, and other platforms, providing a seamless management experience. This capability simplifies coordination between different systems and platforms.
While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual... While the functionality is praised, several reviews mention that the interface appears outdated and could benefit from modernization to enhance visual appeal and efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hilton OnQ and Redforts share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hilton OnQ offers 6 verified integration partners, while Redforts offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Redforts leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 1.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hilton OnQ: No. Redforts: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hilton has an HT Score of 0 and Redforts has 73. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor