The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 40 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HKeeper shines in customer support and ROI .
Amadeus shines in ease of use , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
Side-by-side ratings based on 40 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 37 | 3 |
After analyzing 40 verified reviews, HKeeper users most value its task automation, customer satisfaction and continuous improvement, inter-departmental communication, while Amadeus users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Task Automation
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Satisfaction and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
|
+
Inter-departmental Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Reporting and Task Categorization
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile Accessibility & Usability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 14 reviews | #16 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #12 18 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #9 4 reviews | #15 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #12 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 5 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #9 16 reviews | #16 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 11 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 10 reviews | #18 0 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #10 4 reviews | #11 2 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #9 19 reviews | #14 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 5 reviews | #13 0 reviews |
Choosing between HKeeper Housekeeping by HKeeper and Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping by Amadeus hinges on your hotel's operational needs and priorities. Both solve core housekeeping management challenges—streamlining workflows, improving staff coordination, and enhancing guest satisfaction—but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and support structures. Knowing which aligns best with your hotel’s size, segment, and growth plans will determine your success.
HKeeper offers a more recent and robust review base, with 33 reviews in the last six months, compared to Amadeus’s 3. This makes HKeeper’s feedback more current and reliable to assess. Do you want a software with proven recent acclaim or a more established but less reviewed platform?
HKeeper and Amadeus both target hotel housekeeping operations, but HKeeper emphasizes AI integration, real-time inventory, and interdepartmental communication, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational transparency. Amadeus offers deep automation, task prioritization, and a broader feature set, suited for larger properties aiming for efficiency and staff productivity.
HKeeper’s strengths lie in reducing administrative tasks, promoting team collaboration, and providing a user-friendly interface. Conversely, Amadeus’s wide array of features like lost & found, preventative maintenance, and analytics cater to hotels that want detailed operational oversight.
The choice comes down to your hotel’s size and focus: HKeeper is favored by hotels valuing simplicity and real-time communication, while Amadeus appeals to properties seeking extensive automation and multi-property management. Are your core needs operational transparency or advanced automation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, highly rated housekeeping system that reduces labor costs and improves communication, HKeeper is your best choice. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use, excellent support, and a high NPS of 9.67/10, making it ideal for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
If your hotel requires a broad feature set with modules like preventative maintenance, real-time task tracking, and multi-property oversight, Amadeus’s platform offers 17 unique features not available in HKeeper. It’s better suited for larger chains or hotels needing advanced automation and integration.
For smaller or mid-sized hotels focused on streamlining housekeeping workflows, HKeeper’s user reviews and high ratings make it the clear pick. Larger properties or those with complex operational needs should lean toward Amadeus’s comprehensive functionality.
HKeeper’s UI is highly rated at 4.68/5, praised for its simplicity and multi-language support, helping staff adopt quickly. Its onboarding process, rated 4.79/5, ensures your team can get up and running swiftly, with many reviewers emphasizing its intuitive design.
Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with users citing its straightforward mobile access and automated workflows that require minimal training. However, support support ratings (1.83/5) are notably lower, often cited as a challenge in onboarding or troubleshooting.
Edge: HKeeper.
Amadeus offers 17 features exclusive to its platform, including lost & found, preventative maintenance, real-time task tracking, and analytics dashboards—enhancing operational oversight for larger hotels. It also provides mobile access, in-app translation, case management, and an open API, broadening customization options.
HKeeper’s absence of unique features means it relies on its core modules—inventory, workflows, communication, and automation—delivering efficiency without complexity. With no exclusive modules, HKeeper's simplicity can be advantageous.
In summary, if your hotel needs specialized features like preventative maintenance or detailed analytics, Amadeus is better. For straightforward housekeeping management, HKeeper’s simplicity suffices.
Edge: Amadeus.
HKeeper’s support is highly rated at 4.89/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and effective onboarding. Customers describe HKeeper support as proactive, with many noting its responsiveness and continuous product improvements.
Amadeus’s customer support, rated at just 1.83/5, receives consistent criticism for slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. Reviewers mention frustration with unreturned calls and ineffective issue escalation, which hampers user experience.
Edge: HKeeper.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified integrations, including major property management systems, revenue management, and marketing platforms. Shared partners like SiteMinder and Mews highlight its extensive ecosystem, suitable for hotels seeking seamless operational connectivity.
HKeeper has 18 verified partners, with notable integrations like Guesty and Winhotel, but fewer overall options. If your hotel relies on a complex array of third-party systems, Amadeus’s extensive integrations give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Amadeus.
HKeeper’s recent reviews point to a 4.83/5 overall rating, with 97% likelihood to recommend, and a very high NPS score (9.67/10). Hotels across segments, especially luxury and branded hotels, rate HKeeper very highly, praising its ease of use, support, and operational impact.
Amadeus’s overall rating is 4/5, but review count is only 3, and recent feedback is limited. Customer satisfaction appears lower, especially concerning support, which impacts its perceived value.
In terms of recent reviews and ratings, HKeeper is the stronger performer.
Edge: HKeeper.
Both HKeeper and Amadeus do not publicly share specific pricing details, indicating a bespoke quotation process based on hotel size and needs. Expect to discuss custom pricing directly with sales teams for both platforms.
If budget transparency is crucial, neither platform currently offers straightforward pricing, which is typical for enterprise hotel management solutions.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation features or multi-property management capabilities.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple interface or limited automation.
HKeeper stands out with its recent high ratings, excellent support, and strong user sentiment, making it a reliable choice for hotels prioritizing operational simplicity and staff communication. Its focus on automation and inventory management helps reduce costs and improve guest experiences, especially for mid-sized or boutique hotels.
Amadeus offers a broad suite of features and integrations, ideal for larger hotels or chains with complex operational demands. Its automation tools can boost staff productivity across multiple properties but may require more extensive training and support.
If your hotel values recent user feedback and straightforward usability, HKeeper is the definitive choice. If your operations demand deep automation, detailed analytics, and extensive integrations, Amadeus is better suited to your needs.
In conclusion, for most hotels currently evaluating housekeeping software, HKeeper’s recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it the safer, more reliable option.
According to HTR's product database, HKeeper Housekeeping and Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping share 18 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Deep cleaning | ||
| Late checkouts | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking | ||
| Virtual logbook |
Showing top differences. 5 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Automation of daily, weekly, and monthly tasks helps streamline housekeeping operations and other hotel functions, significantly reducing manual labor... Automation of daily, weekly, and monthly tasks helps streamline housekeeping operations and other hotel functions, significantly reducing manual labor and improving efficiency.
HKeeper consistently enhances functionality based on user feedback, leading to high customer satisfaction. However, there is an ongoing demand for con... HKeeper consistently enhances functionality based on user feedback, leading to high customer satisfaction. However, there is an ongoing demand for continuous updates and feature expansions.
The tool facilitates seamless communication between departments, significantly reducing the need for phone calls and paper lists, and improving overal... The tool facilitates seamless communication between departments, significantly reducing the need for phone calls and paper lists, and improving overall coordination.
Where hoteliers push back
The mobile app version of HKeeper is highly appreciated for increasing operational efficiency, though users have suggested improvements like more colo... The mobile app version of HKeeper is highly appreciated for increasing operational efficiency, though users have suggested improvements like more color themes for better visibility and UX.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HKeeper Housekeeping and Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. HKeeper Housekeeping offers 18 verified integration partners, while Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping offers 104. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HKeeper Housekeeping: No. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HKeeper has an HT Score of 25 and Amadeus has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor