The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hogatex shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Hogatex users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Hogatex |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between Hogatex PMS by Hogatex and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but Hogatex offers a nearly nonexistent online presence and zero reviews, indicating it might not be a viable option for modern hoteliers. Mews, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with an impressive 4.62 out of 5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend—making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven, current technology.
If your priority is a system backed by active user feedback and ongoing innovation, Mews clearly leads. Hogatex’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s either nascent or inactive, raising doubts about its support and future development. Are you comfortable navigating an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with extensive community validation?
Hogatex presents as a property management solution, but with no available reviews or recent activity, it's difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Mews, by contrast, boasts 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, emphasizing its active development and customer engagement—factors critical for today’s hotel operators. The stark difference suggests Mews is the safer, more tested option, especially for hotels seeking modern, scalable management.
Hogatex’s absence of a review base means you lack insight into real-world performance, support quality, or feature reliability. Meanwhile, Mews’s high review count and recent feedback highlight a well-established platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Which would you rather rely on for your hotel’s future?
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with a notable 4.27 for customer support, reflecting a user-friendly interface and reliable onboarding. Hogatex, with a rating of zero, offers no data to support its ease of use or staff adoption—raising questions about implementation clarity.
Most Mews users praise the platform’s intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training requirements, citing the onboarding process as smooth and staff adoption high. Hogatex’s lack of review data suggests it may lack the user-focused design needed for efficient adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite with 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated channel manager, mobile apps, and advanced reporting—features crucial for modern hotel management. Hogatex provides none of these, indicating a likely limited or non-existent feature set.
The depth and breadth of Mews’s features enable it to serve diverse hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with capabilities that support revenue growth and operational control. Hogatex’s minimal feature offering suggests it’s either very early-stage or not designed for comprehensive hotel management. The clear edge goes to Mews.
Mews scores 4.27 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Hogatex has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality, responsiveness, or user satisfaction.
In the hospitality industry, reliable support is vital for smooth operations and quick resolution of issues. Mews’s active support team and positive reviews demonstrate its commitment, whereas Hogatex’s silence indicates a potential risk. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including industry-leading channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, offering a flexible, connected tech ecosystem. Hogatex, with zero verified partnerships, likely has limited or no integrations, restricting its utility in a multi-channel environment.
The extensive integrations of Mews allow hotels to customize their tech stack, automate workflows, and optimize revenue. Hogatex’s lack of integrations suggests it’s not built for the interconnected, modern hospitality landscape. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, Mews is clearly favored by hoteliers across various segments, from boutique hotels to large chains. Hogatex, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated, indicating no proven user satisfaction.
Hotels that have adopted Mews often praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, boosting confidence in its reliability and scalability. Hogatex’s lack of feedback means hoteliers must rely on assumptions rather than proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Hogatex pricing is unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and potential costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, providing clarity upfront.
While Mews’s cost may seem significant, its comprehensive features and active support justify the investment, especially considering the ROI and efficiency gains reported. Hogatex’s price is unknown, making it difficult to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Given Hogatex’s limited feature set and no active reviews, it’s best suited for properties with minimal management complexity or those willing to develop their own solution.
Mews excels across multiple segments, from luxury to budget, and is suited for properties aiming to modernize and grow.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands of hotels globally, with active development and support evidenced by recent reviews. Hogatex, with no reviews or recent activity, is unlikely to meet the needs of modern hoteliers or support growth.
If your hotel values a proven, highly-rated system that integrates seamlessly and offers ongoing innovation, Mews is the clear choice. Hogatex’s limited data and feature set suggest it’s not suitable for hotels looking to scale or improve operational efficiency.
Choose Mews if you want a reliable, customizable platform with proven support and community trust. Opt for Hogatex only if your hotel has very specific, minimal needs and you’re prepared to manage its limitations without the backing of a vibrant user base or active development.
According to HTR's product database, Hogatex PMS and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hogatex PMS and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hogatex PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hogatex PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hogatex has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor