The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Acigrup shines .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Revenue management module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Acigrup users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Acigrup |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that consolidates operations, enhances guest experiences, and supports growth. Acigrup’s Hotel Software and RMS both aim to solve these core challenges but diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. Acigrup’s offering appears to be a basic, less-reviewed platform, while RMS boasts extensive functionality, widespread adoption, and recent positive reviews. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s current needs and future plans?
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but RMS offers a far more comprehensive suite of features, with over 74 functionalities compared to Acigrup’s zero. RMS’s recent reviews emphasize ease of use, robust support, and a broad feature set that covers everything from reservations to revenue management, while Acigrup’s limited or absent user feedback raises questions about its reliability and user satisfaction. Do you prioritize a well-supported, feature-rich platform or a less proven solution?
Acigrup’s reviews are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge how well it performs in real hotel settings, whereas RMS’s recent reviews are plentiful, with 20 in the last six months alone, indicating active customer engagement. RMS’s high user ratings—4.56/5 overall—contrast sharply with Acigrup’s 0/5 score, reflecting confidence in the latter’s reliability and support. Given the data, RMS clearly has the advantage of proven performance and ongoing customer satisfaction.
Would investing in a system with demonstrated recent support and features better serve your hotel’s operational needs? RMS’s extensive, recent feedback suggests it is the stronger choice.
If your hotel needs a full-featured PMS capable of managing reservations, housekeeping, channel distribution, guest profiles, reporting, and revenue management, RMS is the clear choice. Its large user base and extensive feature set—74 features including integrated CRS, online booking, and group functionality—make it suitable for complex operations and growth ambitions. For a hotel that values proven scalability and rich capabilities, RMS is the smarter option.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a simple, cost-effective solution with minimal features, or if you are testing a new PMS without commitment, Acigrup might appeal—though its lack of recent reviews makes this uncertain. Typically, Acigrup’s offering appears to lack detailed features, integrations, or support data, making it unsuitable for hotels aiming for operational efficiency at scale. If your priority is a comprehensive toolset, RMS is the better fit.
In summary, for most hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich, scalable PMS, RMS’s current market presence and recent positive reviews make it the recommended choice.
RMS scores 4.28/5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews praising its user-friendly interface and quick onboarding—some customers mention onboarding times as short as nine days. RMS’s recent reviews highlight a system that staff can adopt quickly, with minimal learning curve, and support that is prompt and helpful.
Acigrup’s user experience data is unavailable, and its review score is zero, indicating no recent user feedback to evaluate. Without concrete user ratings or feedback, it’s difficult to determine whether Acigrup offers an intuitive, easy-to-learn interface.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s feature count of 74 dwarfs Acigrup’s zero, including critical modules like integrated CRS, online booking engine, payment processing, revenue management, guest CRM, multi-lingual/multi-currency support, and extensive channel management. RMS also offers advanced tools such as automated night audits, guest feedback management, mobile check-in, and real-time reporting—features that significantly enhance operational control.
Acigrup provides no detailed feature list or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature depth or variety. Based solely on available data, RMS’s comprehensive feature set makes it the clear winner.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support and onboarding ratings stand at 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its prompt, knowledgeable, and helpful team, citing instances of immediate assistance and friendly service. Customers appreciate the proactive support, which reduces downtime and enhances system adoption.
Acigrup’s customer support rating is unavailable, and with no recent reviews, confidence in its support quality is impossible. Given RMS’s strong support reputation based on recent feedback, it holds the advantage.
Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified partner integrations, including major channels and tools like Criton, Sage, STR, HiJiffy, and a host of property management, revenue, and POS systems. Its extensive integrations facilitate smooth operations across booking, payment, marketing, and reporting.
Acigrup does not list any verified partners or integrations, severely limiting its connectivity options. For hotels seeking flexibility and a connected tech environment, RMS is the clear leader.
Edge: RMS.
RMS’s overall rating of 4.56/5, based on 293 reviews, outclasses Acigrup’s 0/5, which is unsubstantiated. Recent reviews highlight RMS’s ease of use, support, and feature depth, with users such as Lafayette Hotels and Roomzzz praising its scalability and automation.
Acigrup’s review absence leaves no data on hotel satisfaction or property segment performance. Clearly, RMS’s proven track record and high ratings make it the favored choice among hoteliers.
Edge: RMS.
Acigrup does not publicly disclose pricing, implying custom quotes or a less transparent approach. RMS’s pricing starts at $800 per month, with no free tier or trial information listed, indicating a significant investment for a comprehensive system.
While RMS’s cost may be higher, the extensive features and support justify the expense for hotels seeking scalable solutions. Acigrup’s undefined pricing makes it difficult to evaluate value.
Given the lack of recent review data and feature details, Acigrup is best suited for very small properties with straightforward needs or as a trial platform.
Not ideal if your hotel has extremely limited technology budgets, or if you need a quick, lightweight solution without ongoing support or advanced features.
The core difference lies in scope: RMS offers a full suite of features, integrations, and support, while Acigrup’s offering is unproven and lacks detailed data. RMS’s extensive recent reviews, high user ratings, and active support make it the safer, more reliable choice for most hotels.
If your hotel needs a mature, scalable platform with proven support and features, RMS is the clear winner. Its large user base, recent positive reviews, and broad capabilities outperform Acigrup’s limited or undisclosed offerings.
However, if your hotel has minimal operational needs, a very tight budget, or is testing a PMS for future expansion, Acigrup might be worth exploring—though caution is advised given the lack of recent feedback.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers, RMS provides the trust, depth, and support required to manage and grow your property effectively.
According to HTR's product database, Hotel Software and RMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Acigrup |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 62 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hotel Software and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hotel Software offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hotel Software: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Acigrup has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor