The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 904 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HotelRunner shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews shines when it comes to ease of use — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 904 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 17 | 887 |
After analyzing 904 verified reviews, HotelRunner users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #38 5 reviews | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #44 3 reviews | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #34 1 reviews | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #41 0 reviews | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #36 8 reviews | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #38 3 reviews | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #47 1 reviews | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #49 0 reviews | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #36 2 reviews | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #35 3 reviews | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #25 0 reviews | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #4 6 reviews | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and support at scale. HotelRunner offers a straightforward, highly-rated solution with a focus on ease and value, while Mews provides a broader, more integrated platform backed by extensive reviews and recent positive feedback. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s current and future goals?
Are you looking for a user-friendly, cost-effective platform with a dedicated support team, or a comprehensive operating system that can scale across multiple properties and integrate with hundreds of third-party tools? Let’s compare these two contenders in detail.
HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS both address core hospitality management issues—reservation handling, guest management, and operational automation—but their approaches differ. HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small hotels or boutique properties that want a straightforward solution. Mews, on the other hand, offers a cloud-native, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations and advanced features, suited for growing or multi-property management.
When it comes to recent reviews, Mews outperforms HotelRunner by a considerable margin, with 758 reviews in the last six months compared to HotelRunner's zero. This indicates a more active user base and a product that continues to evolve rapidly. Do you want a proven system with a large, recent user community, or a smaller, highly-rated platform that may be better for basic operations?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable system capable of managing multiple properties and complex operations, Mews is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels that require extensive integrations, automation, and a modern guest experience. Conversely, if your property prioritizes simplicity, immediate value, and lower costs, HotelRunner’s straightforward interface and highly-rated customer support make it a better fit.
For boutique hotels or properties with limited tech needs, HotelRunner’s $100/month fee and focus on core PMS functions are attractive. However, for hotels aiming for digital transformation, dynamic pricing, and extensive third-party integrations, Mews’ robust feature set and expansive ecosystem justify its $900/month price.
HotelRunner boasts an impressive ease-of-use rating of 4.81/5, with users emphasizing its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and ongoing support. Its mobile app, however, is noted as limited, with customers wanting more functionalities like reservations and edits on the go.
Mews also scores highly at 4.7/5, with users citing its intuitive modern interface, straightforward setup, and clear workflows. While both platforms are easy to adopt, HotelRunner’s smaller feature set and simpler design make it slightly easier for small teams to learn quickly.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 27 shared features plus 2 unique ones: on-premise management and voice-to-text notes & tasks on mobile devices. Its unique features cater to basic operational needs and mobile note-taking but lack advanced automation or guest engagement tools.
Mews stands out with 32 unique features—guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, employee messaging, shift planning, and more—adding significant value for larger or tech-savvy hotels. Its comprehensive suite supports complex operations and enhances guest experiences, giving it a clear edge.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner receives perfect support ratings of 5/5, with reviews praising their ongoing training, responsiveness, and relationship-building. Customers appreciate their dedicated support team and proactive assistance, particularly during onboarding.
Mews’ support ratings are solid at 4.27/5, with users noting that issues are usually quickly addressed but some experience occasional bugs or delays. Although Mews is known for continuous innovation, HotelRunner’s support consistently receives higher praise.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including key OTAs and channel managers like Airbnb, Expedia, and Booking.com, focusing on core distribution needs. Its fewer integrations mean less flexibility but easier management for smaller properties.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including industry giants like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and Sage, and thousands of third-party tools via the Mews Marketplace. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack significantly.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner’s reviews are limited to 16, all very recent, with a perfect rating of 5/5, primarily from boutique and small hotels. The reviews highlight ease of use, support, and operational improvements, especially among smaller properties.
Mews has 758 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.62/5. Its reviews span various hotel segments, including independent, boutique, and branded hotels, with many praising automation and scalability. The recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a reliable, innovative platform.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner charges $100 monthly per property with no implementation fees or free trial. Its straightforward pricing makes it accessible for small hotels with limited budgets.
Mews’ pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and scalability options, making it suitable for larger or multi-property operations.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a comprehensive, scalable platform with a vast feature set and active user community, ideal for hotels seeking growth and advanced automation. HotelRunner excels at providing a simple, cost-effective solution with high support quality, perfect for small properties prioritizing ease and value.
If your hotel needs to streamline operations across multiple locations, automate guest interactions, and integrate with a broad ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on managing a single boutique or small hotel efficiently without the complexity or cost, HotelRunner offers a reliable, straightforward option.
For hotels with ambitious growth plans, Mews’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the stronger candidate. Small, boutique properties or those new to PMS technology should consider HotelRunner’s simplicity and support, which have earned it a near-perfect reputation.
In conclusion, prioritize Mews if your hotel aims to scale, automate, and innovate—its recent reviews and extensive ecosystem support this. If your needs are more basic, cost-conscious, and focused on ease, HotelRunner provides a proven, well-supported platform that can meet your immediate operational goals.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS share 27 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 22 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HotelRunner PMS offers 17 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. HotelRunner PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HotelRunner PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HotelRunner has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor