The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 37 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
planet / Hoist shines .
Mini Hotel PMS shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Side-by-side ratings based on 37 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 37 |
After analyzing 37 verified reviews, planet / Hoist users most value its , while Mini Hotel PMS users highlight user-friendly interface, technical support, customer communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Technical Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Scalability
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Administrative Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile App and Interface Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost of Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #36 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #39 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #44 6 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #33 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #33 5 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #23 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #46 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #32 5 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #23 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #12 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Hoist (by Planet) and MiniHotel aim to streamline reservations, manage bookings, and support property operations, but they differ significantly in maturity, reviews, and features. Hoist has been around since 1994 but has zero recent reviews, making its current relevance uncertain. MiniHotel, on the other hand, boasts 33 recent reviews with a high recommendation score, indicating stronger recent performance.
Given the data, MiniHotel’s active review presence and high customer satisfaction suggest it is likely the more reliable choice for most hotels. Do you want a mature system with limited recent feedback or a newer, well-reviewed platform that actively supports small to medium-sized properties?
Hoist (by Planet), founded in 1994, has a long history but no recent reviews or user feedback, raising questions about its current functionality and support. It also has a rating of 0/5 in most categories, with no user reviews in the last six months, indicating a lack of recent customer validation. Conversely, MiniHotel has 33 reviews from the past six months, with a 96% likelihood to recommend and an NPS of nearly 10, showing strong ongoing user satisfaction.
MiniHotel’s high ease of use (4.73/5) and customer support (4.79/5) contrast sharply with Hoist’s nonexistent ratings, making it a safer bet for hotels seeking dependable, modern support and functionality. The question remains: which platform will serve your hotel better in today’s competitive environment?
If your hotel needs a modern, fully-featured PMS with excellent customer reviews, choose MiniHotel. It is ideal for small to medium-sized properties, including boutique hotels, hostels, and vacation rentals, thanks to its user-friendly design and robust capabilities.
Hoist might appeal to hotels with long-standing relationships or those seeking a legacy system, but the absence of recent reviews and updates suggests it may lack current features or support. For most hotels prioritizing ease, reliability, and current customer satisfaction, MiniHotel is the clear choice.
MiniHotel’s user rating of 4.73/5 and recent reviews praising its intuitive interface highlight ease of use. Customers find it straightforward to manage reservations, access reports, and communicate with guests, reducing training time and operational friction. Support is rated at 4.79/5, with quick, helpful responses, further easing staff onboarding.
Hoist remains unreviewed in recent months, with zero ratings across categories, making it impossible to evaluate usability or support quality today. Given the available data, Edge: MiniHotel.
MiniHotel offers 39 features, including multi-currency support, channel management, booking engine, online check-in/out, guest communication, revenue management, integrated ID scanners, and housekeping modules. Many of these are absent in Hoist, which reportedly has no features to compare.
Hoist provides no detailed features list, and with zero recent reviews or updates, it’s unclear whether its capabilities meet modern hotel needs. The comprehensive feature set of MiniHotel makes it the better choice. Edge: MiniHotel.
MiniHotel’s support rating of 4.79/5 reflects consistent praise for quick, helpful assistance via multiple channels, including WhatsApp and chat. Recent reviews highlight its responsiveness and effective problem resolution, essential for smooth operations.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Hoist, so its support quality cannot be assessed. The current customer feedback landscape strongly favors MiniHotel. Edge: MiniHotel.
MiniHotel boasts 15 verified integrations, including popular platforms like Duve, SiteMinder, Beds24, PriceLabs, and HelloShift, alongside 300+ booking sites and payment processors. Hoist’s two verified partners—Dailypoint and RoomPriceGenie—are limited in comparison.
The broader integration ecosystem of MiniHotel allows your hotel to connect more platforms, automate tasks, and optimize revenue. For this reason, it wins in this category. Edge: MiniHotel.
MiniHotel’s recent reviews indicate a 96% likelihood of recommendation, with high ratings on ease of use and support. Its positive feedback spans various property types, including vacation rentals and boutique hotels, emphasizing its versatility.
Hoist offers no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Given the recent positive feedback, MiniHotel is clearly the preferred choice. Edge: MiniHotel.
MiniHotel’s pricing starts at $200 monthly, with no implementation or setup fees, offering transparency and predictability. Hoist does not publish pricing, and given the absence of recent reviews, its cost structure remains unclear.
Your decision may depend on whether a fixed monthly fee fits your budget or if you require a detailed quote. Based on available data, MiniHotel’s clear pricing model is more accessible.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MiniHotel’s recent reviews, high customer satisfaction, and feature set make it the better choice for most small to medium hotels today. Its active user base and ongoing support demonstrate its relevance and reliability in the current market.
Hoist, despite its long history, offers no recent feedback, leaving uncertainty about its current capabilities and support. If your hotel needs a modern, well-supported, and highly reviewed platform, MiniHotel is the clear winner.
In summary, for hotels prioritizing ease of use, strong customer support, and active development, MiniHotel is the recommended option. Conversely, Hoist may appeal only to legacy users or properties with minimal operational complexity seeking a basic system.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, hotsoft by planet and MiniHotel share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual |
Showing top differences. 27 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently appreciate the simplicity and efficiency of the Mini Hotel interface, making it easy to manage reservations and other operations. Thi... Users frequently appreciate the simplicity and efficiency of the Mini Hotel interface, making it easy to manage reservations and other operations. This ease of use significantly reduces the time spent on managing bookings, directly improving operational efficiency.
Exceptional technical support is a major highlight for Mini Hotel users. Reviews frequently mention quick and helpful responses from the support team,... Exceptional technical support is a major highlight for Mini Hotel users. Reviews frequently mention quick and helpful responses from the support team, especially through WhatsApp and online chat. This level of support ensures smooth operations and swift resolution of issues.
Improving communication features, such as in-app messaging and better yield manager integration, could enhance the interaction between hotels and gues... Improving communication features, such as in-app messaging and better yield manager integration, could enhance the interaction between hotels and guests, leading to a more seamless customer experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the system is generally praised, some users feel the administrative interface is too basic. Improvements in this area could enhance functionalit... While the system is generally praised, some users feel the administrative interface is too basic. Improvements in this area could enhance functionality and user interaction, directly impacting efficiency for administrative tasks.
Several users believe there's room for improvement in the mobile app and overall interface, suggesting enhancements could further boost usability. The... Several users believe there's room for improvement in the mobile app and overall interface, suggesting enhancements could further boost usability. These improvements could enhance user experience, particularly for admin and on-the-go management.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. hotsoft by planet and MiniHotel share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. hotsoft by planet offers 2 verified integration partners, while MiniHotel offers 15. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MiniHotel leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
hotsoft by planet: No. MiniHotel: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. planet / Hoist has an HT Score of 0 and Mini Hotel PMS has 71. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor