The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 207 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hoxell shines when it comes to operational efficiency , with exclusive features like Mobile access on any device.
hub OS shines when it comes to efficiency in task management — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Open API.
Side-by-side ratings based on 207 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 177 |
After analyzing 207 verified reviews, Hoxell users most value its operational efficiency, quality control & customer service, user-friendly interface, while hub OS users highlight efficiency in task management, customization options, housekeeping module. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
+
Efficiency in task management
▾
|
|
+
Quality Control & Customer Service
▾
|
+
Customization options
▾
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
+
Housekeeping module
▾
|
|
+
Departmental Integration & Communication
▾
|
+
Maintenance module
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
−
Reporting & Tracking
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #12 2 reviews | #5 13 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #11 23 reviews | #4 85 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #12 4 reviews | #2 62 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #13 1 reviews | #5 9 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #11 12 reviews | #4 74 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 13 reviews | #3 73 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #12 11 reviews | #2 70 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #8 11 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 3 reviews | #8 10 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #7 27 reviews | #3 132 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #8 1 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #2 7 reviews |
Choosing the right housekeeping software can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations, guest satisfaction, and staff productivity. Both Hoxell and hub OS Housekeeping aim to streamline departmental coordination and improve efficiency, but they approach this goal differently. Hoxell offers a more integrated, feature-rich platform with a strong focus on departmental communication and maintenance management, whereas hub OS provides a user-friendly, department-connected solution emphasizing task automation and real-time updates. Which solution aligns better with your hotel's specific needs?
Hoxell and hub OS both serve to automate and improve housekeeping and maintenance, but their core strengths diverge. Hoxell emphasizes seamless departmental integration, real-time task tracking, and an extensive suite of features, including a dedicated maintenance module and marketing tools like MyPage. Conversely, hub OS focuses heavily on task automation, immediate guest request handling, and connecting departments through a mobile-centered interface. With Hoxell's 28 reviews and recent feedback, it has a more established reputation, while hub OS's 161 reviews across multiple regions reflect broader market presence and user confidence. Which approach better suits your hotel's operational style?
If your hotel needs a highly integrated platform that combines operational efficiency with marketing tools and detailed departmental communication, Hoxell is the better fit. Its rich feature set, including real-time task tracking and multi-property monitoring, appeals to properties seeking comprehensive control. If your hotel requires a straightforward, mobile-friendly solution that boosts housekeeping productivity and enhances guest request response times, hub OS offers a more intuitive experience. For hotels prioritizing broad regional support and extensive integration options, hub OS’s larger partner network and 161 reviews make it a safer choice.
Hoxell's interface is highly rated at 4.89/5, praised for being intuitive and visually organized, which facilitates staff onboarding and daily operation. Users mention that even minimal-tech staff find it manageable, with quick adoption across departments. hub OS scores slightly lower at 4.86/5, but reviews highlight its straightforward mobile interface that many staff find easy to navigate, especially for task management. However, some users report occasional mobile app performance issues. Edge: Hoxell.
Hoxell leads with 17 exclusive features, including a lost & found module, late checkouts, deep cleaning, inspection tools, analytics dashboards, and open API, providing a broader scope for hotel automation and customization. hub OS offers only one unique feature—an open API—while sharing the core features common to both platforms. This makes Hoxell more adaptable for diverse operational needs. Edge: Hoxell.
Hoxell consistently receives top ratings for customer support at 4.98/5, with reviews emphasizing their quick, attentive responses and proactive assistance. Users describe support as "responsive and helpful," often resolving issues promptly, which minimizes downtime. hub OS also scores well at 4.8/5, with praise for its support team, but some reviews note occasional delays in troubleshooting, especially regarding mobile app performance. Edge: Hoxell.
hub OS boasts 23 verified partners compared to Hoxell's 12, including notable integrations like SAP, Infor, and other industry-specific systems. Both platforms share four common partners, such as Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but hub OS's broader partner network can facilitate easier integration in complex hotel tech stacks. If extensive integration options are a priority, hub OS holds a slight edge.
Hoxell's overall review score of 4.94/5 is slightly higher than hub OS’s 4.88/5, with recent reviews reinforcing its strong reputation. Hoteliers in luxury and boutique segments particularly praise Hoxell’s user-friendly design and comprehensive features, reflected in its 25 reviews with an average rating of 4.94. In contrast, hub OS’s 142 recent reviews maintain a high rating at 4.88, with many users emphasizing its ease of use and productivity improvements. Edge: Hoxell.
Both platforms are priced at a flat $300.00 monthly fee, with no implementation fees, freemium options, or tiered plans. This straightforward pricing structure simplifies budgeting and comparison, making the decision more about feature fit rather than cost.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with limited tech needs, or prefers a very lightweight solution.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a highly customizable platform with extensive departmental modules like deep cleaning or marketing tools.
Hoxell and hub OS both streamline hotel operations but serve different priorities. Hoxell’s core advantage is its rich feature set, comprehensive departmental integration, and high ratings driven by a smaller but dedicated user base. It is well-suited for hotels seeking an all-in-one operational and marketing platform that scales across properties.
hub OS excels in ease of use, mobile task management, and broad integration capabilities, making it ideal for hotels that want a straightforward, department-connected solution with extensive system partnerships. Its larger user base and regional coverage give it an edge for hotels operating in diverse markets.
If your focus is on detailed departmental control, marketing, and multi-property oversight, choose Hoxell. For a more flexible, mobile-first approach with broad integration options, hub OS is the better choice.
Overall, Hoxell’s more recent reviews and higher overall score make it the more reliable option for hoteliers prioritizing features and support.
According to HTR's product database, Hoxell and hub OS Housekeeping share 17 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Deep cleaning | ||
| Inspection | ||
| Late checkouts | ||
| Lost & found module | ||
| Open API | ||
| Preventative maintenance module | ||
| Real time task tracking |
Showing top differences. 6 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently mention how Hoxell streamlines daily operations and improves productivity. The tool helps manage work shifts, track tasks in real-tim... Users frequently mention how Hoxell streamlines daily operations and improves productivity. The tool helps manage work shifts, track tasks in real-time, and coordinate maintenance, ultimately saving time and making operations smoother.
Hoxell helps hotels maintain high-quality standards through efficient task tracking and streamlined internal communication, which directly impacts gue... Hoxell helps hotels maintain high-quality standards through efficient task tracking and streamlined internal communication, which directly impacts guest satisfaction. The tool also enhances customer service capabilities by addressing maintenance issues swiftly and keeping housekeeping aligned.
The tool’s intuitive interface receives high praise for being easy to navigate, which streamlines training and daily use. Even staff with minimal tech... The tool’s intuitive interface receives high praise for being easy to navigate, which streamlines training and daily use. Even staff with minimal tech experience find it manageable, facilitating smoother adoption and usage across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
While many users appreciate Hoxell's integration capabilities, some have noted challenges with integrating the software with their Property Management... While many users appreciate Hoxell's integration capabilities, some have noted challenges with integrating the software with their Property Management Systems (PMS), particularly regarding guest references and communication errors.
Hoxell offers robust reporting features, but some users mention the need for more customizable options and improved integration with other systems for... Hoxell offers robust reporting features, but some users mention the need for more customizable options and improved integration with other systems for better report download and editing capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves commu... Hub OS significantly increases task management efficiency across departments like housekeeping, maintenance, and front desk. The system improves communication, task delegation, and tracking, leading to more streamlined operations and higher productivity. A few reviews, however, point to areas where additional features could enhance task management further.
While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settin... While Hub OS is appreciated for its flexibility and customization capabilities, several users note that certain customizations and personalized settings are challenging to achieve without technical support. There is a desire for more self-servicing options within the software, especially related to the mobile app and user interface.
The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see r... The housekeeping module of Hub OS receives high praise as a game-changer, drastically improving efficiency and productivity. It enables staff to see room statuses, report issues promptly, and manage tasks effectively. Several reviews specifically mention that the system helps maintain high housekeeping cleanliness scores.
Where hoteliers push back
Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like... Hub OS is highly praised for its seamless integration with Property Management Systems (PMS), making it easier to manage various hotel operations like housekeeping and maintenance efficiently in one place. Nonetheless, some reviews mention occasional delays and issues with syncing integrations, specifically with systems such as SAP and Opera.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Hoxell and hub OS Housekeeping share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Hoxell offers 12 verified integration partners, while hub OS Housekeeping offers 23. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Hoxell leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hoxell: No. hub OS Housekeeping: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hoxell has an HT Score of 74 and hub OS has 34. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor