The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing between IDB PMS by Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, size, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. IDB PMS has virtually no recent reviews or active user feedback, raising questions about its reliability and support. Mews, on the other hand, boasts nearly 760 reviews, with over 98 in the past six months, making it a proven choice for modern hoteliers.
Given the data, your decision should favor the platform with the more current user feedback and broader market presence. Does your hotel prioritize a system with a robust community and ongoing enhancements? Or are you exploring a lesser-known solution with limited recent engagement?
Both IDB PMS and Mews PMS serve the core purpose of managing reservations, guest data, and operations, but their market traction and user satisfaction tell a different story. IDB PMS’s lack of reviews and zero ratings indicate no recent user validation, which is a red flag for ongoing support and feature updates. Conversely, Mews’s high rating of 4.62/5 across over 750 reviews highlights consistent satisfaction, especially among boutique, hostel, and city-center hotels.
While IDB PMS claims to offer comprehensive tools, the absence of recent feedback makes assessing its effectiveness impossible. Mews, with its modern interface, extensive integrations, and positive user testimonials, clearly demonstrates its value in today’s hotel environment. Are you comfortable deploying a system without verified, recent user experiences? Or do you prefer a proven solution backed by active users?
Edge: Mews.
If your hotel needs a flexible, cloud-based PMS with a proven track record of supporting diverse property types—especially boutique hotels, hostels, and small resorts—go with Mews. Its extensive features, over 336 integrations, and strong reputation make it suitable for hotels aiming to innovate and scale.
If your hotel operates within a niche or heavily relies on a bespoke, locally developed system, and you’re prepared to manage potential risks associated with limited user feedback, IDB PMS might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active community, its ability to support growth and provide reliable support remains uncertain.
For hoteliers prioritizing ease of use, support, and a thriving user ecosystem, Mews remains the clear choice. Do you want a system that’s trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide, or are you willing to gamble on an unverified platform?
Edge: Mews.
Mews excels with a user-friendly, modern interface rated 4.7/5, and over 98 recent reviews confirm high satisfaction with onboarding and daily operations. Its intuitive design reduces training time and encourages staff adoption, especially beneficial for small and boutique hotels.
IDB PMS’s UI and user experience are unverified due to the lack of recent reviews, making it impossible to judge usability or staff acceptance. The absence of recent feedback suggests it may not match Mews’s ease of implementation and operation.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a suite of 59 features, including multi-lingual, multi-currency support, guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, and a flexible booking engine—features that are absent in IDB PMS. Its extensive marketplace allows integrations with third-party apps, cloud-based operations, and guest engagement tools.
IDB PMS provides no publicly available feature list, and with no recent reviews, its capabilities are unsubstantiated. Without evidence of modern features or integrations, it appears less suited to the demands of current hospitality standards.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings—4.27/5—are backed by over 98 recent reviews that praise its responsiveness and proactive onboarding. Customers describe Mews support as "excellent" and "helpful," with many appreciating the ongoing assistance during implementation.
IDB PMS’s support quality cannot be assessed due to no recent reviews or user feedback, raising concerns about its ability to assist during critical moments. The lack of recent engagement suggests limited or no active support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including channel managers, revenue management, CRM, POS, and other hotel tech solutions—making it highly adaptable for various operational needs. Its open API and marketplace facilitate rapid connection with third-party tools, supporting scalability.
IDB PMS has no publicly confirmed integrations, and with zero recent reviews, its connectivity options remain unknown. In today’s tech-driven hospitality environment, limited integrations severely restrict operational flexibility.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s 4.62/5 rating is derived from nearly 760 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature set. Boutique hotels, hostels, and city hotels particularly praise Mews for their operational efficiency and guest experience improvements.
IDB PMS’s review count is zero, and with no recent data, its rating remains unknown. Hotels looking for a trusted, heavily reviewed system should lean toward Mews.
Edge: Mews.
IDB PMS does not list pricing publicly, leaving potential buyers in the dark about costs or contract terms. Mews’s basic pricing starts at $900/month, with no free tier or trial, making it a straightforward, transparent investment.
While the absence of IDB PMS pricing complicates a direct comparison, the transparent and predictable pricing of Mews allows for better budgeting and ROI calculations.
Edge: Mews.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if you want a future-proof, highly-rated platform that supports growth and ease of use.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if your hotel is very niche or prefers a locally developed, non-cloud platform.
Mews is a cloud-based, feature-rich PMS supported by thousands of hotels worldwide, with high ratings, recent reviews, and a vast ecosystem of integrations. Its user-friendly interface, active support, and proven track record make it a dependable choice for modern hoteliers.
IDB PMS, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, offers no clear evidence of support, features, or market relevance. Its limited data and lack of recent validation make it a risky choice for hotels seeking stability and growth.
For hoteliers seeking a reliable, scalable, and well-reviewed platform, Mews is the clear winner. If you require a highly customized or niche system with no need for modern features, IDB PMS might still appeal—though the risks are substantial.
Edge: Mews.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, IDB PMS and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. IDB PMS and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. IDB PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
IDB PMS: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor