The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Sphère Informatique shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Sphère Informatique users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical to streamlining your hotel operations and elevating guest experiences. Infor HMS by Infor offers a feature-rich, cloud-based platform with a strong global presence, while Logiciel Chloe by Sphère Informatique, despite its AI-driven capabilities, lacks recent reviews or user feedback. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize proven reliability and extensive integrations or cutting-edge AI features with limited feedback.
Both solutions aim to enhance operational efficiency, but their market maturity and user validation differ significantly. Are you looking for a system backed by a large user base and comprehensive support, or are you open to exploring an innovative AI-driven platform with limited track record?
Infor HMS is a mature, cloud-based PMS with over 46 reviews, predominantly recent, giving it a clear advantage in confidence and reliability. Logiciel Chloe, on the other hand, has no publicly available reviews or recent customer feedback, making its actual performance and user satisfaction uncertain.
Infor’s system has a 4.04/5 overall rating, with 74% of users willing to recommend it, reflecting broad acceptance across hotel segments. Conversely, Chloe has zero ratings, reviews, or customer insights, which makes evaluating its suitability challenging.
Both products serve different needs: Infor HMS provides a proven suite of features like housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and integrations, whereas Chloe’s offerings appear focused on AI-driven insights without verified user validation. Do you want a solution with a proven track record or one promising innovation?
If your hotel needs a reliable, established PMS with extensive integrations, proven support, and a broad feature set, go with Infor HMS. Its strong global footprint and user reviews make it a safer choice for hotels seeking operational consistency, especially in North America, Europe, or Asia.
If your team is eager to adopt an AI-powered platform for property management and strategic insights, and you are comfortable with an untested solution, Chloe might appeal. However, without user feedback or reviews, it’s difficult to assess whether Chloe delivers on its promises or provides tangible ROI.
Given current data, Infor HMS clearly stands out as the more dependable option for most hotels. Chloe’s innovative approach remains unvalidated in the market, posing a risk if stability and proven performance are priorities.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use and boasts a user-friendly interface, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation once familiar. Support and onboarding are rated at 4.04/5, with hoteliers highlighting prompt assistance and short setup times.
Chloe, lacking any publicly available reviews or user ratings, offers no data on usability or onboarding. Its AI-driven features may introduce complexity, especially without user feedback on interface design or staff adoption.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its established reputation, clear usability, and positive support reviews make it more accessible to your team.
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, calendar view, direct billing, multi-lingual, mobile app, revenue management, and automated night audit, making it a comprehensive PMS.
Chloe’s feature set is not publicly detailed, and with no reviews or feature counts, it’s impossible to assess its offerings or compare its capabilities. Its AI-driven insights may be promising but lack validation.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its extensive, proven feature set directly supports hotel operations, offering tangible benefits and integration options.
Infor HMS receives a support rating of 4.04/5, with reviews praising responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful guidance. Hoteliers mention quick resolution times and supportive onboarding, which are crucial during implementation or troubleshooting.
Chloe’s support status is unverified, with no available reviews or feedback on its responsiveness or quality. Without customer support data, assessing the level of ongoing assistance is impossible.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its well-documented support and high ratings provide confidence in ongoing service and problem resolution.
Infor boasts 113 verified integration partners, including major booking engines like SiteMinder, Expedia, and Onity, facilitating seamless connectivity with operational systems. Shared integrations include popular platforms, ensuring broad compatibility.
Chloe has only 11 verified partners, with no shared integrations documented, limiting its connectivity options. Without established integrations, your team might face manual processes or future integration challenges.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its extensive ecosystem simplifies hotel management and reduces manual input.
Infor’s 46 recent reviews average 4.04/5, with positive feedback from diverse hotel segments, including boutique and independent hotels. Reviewers highlight its customization, ease of use, and support as key strengths.
Chloe has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or hotel segment preferences. Without feedback, its real-world performance remains unverified.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its established reputation and recent reviews give it clear credibility.
Infor does not publicly list pricing; most users report a custom quote based on hotel size and scope. There are no free trials or freemium options, indicating a potentially significant investment.
Chloe’s pricing details are also unavailable, and with no public information, assessing value or affordability is impossible.
Both systems require direct inquiries for precise costs, but Infor’s transparency about its extensive features and integrations suggests a higher investment aligned with proven results.
Not ideal if you prefer a lightweight, low-cost solution with minimal features or are in a very small property segment.
Not ideal if you require a robust, proven system with extensive integrations and support.
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, well-established system with proven performance, extensive integrations, and positive recent reviews. Its multiple features and support credentials make it suitable for a broad range of hotels seeking operational efficiency and reliability.
Chloe remains an untested, AI-focused solution without verifiable user feedback or documented features, making it a risky choice for most hotels. Its potential for innovation is clear, but without confirmed results, it’s best seen as an experimental tool rather than a dependable core system.
Choose Infor HMS if you need a trusted, feature-rich PMS with global support. Consider Chloe only if you are comfortable pioneering unvalidated technology and are willing to accept the associated risks.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Logiciel Chloe share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Logiciel Chloe share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Logiciel Chloe offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Logiciel Chloe: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Sphère Informatique has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor