The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 48 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Marriott International shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 48 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 1 |
After analyzing 48 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Marriott International users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #59 1 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | #68 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | #60 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | #43 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS by Infor and FOSSE by Marriott International hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and the importance you place on reviews, features, and integrations. Infor HMS offers a broad suite of functionalities backed by a strong user base and recent reviews, while FOSSE’s proprietary platform is more limited in feedback and integrations. Your team must evaluate which product aligns best with your strategic priorities.
Infor HMS is a cloud-based, highly customizable property management system with a robust feature set and a growing global footprint. In contrast, FOSSE is Marriott’s internal tool, designed primarily for hotels within the Marriott portfolio or those seeking a simpler, Marriott-branded solution. Which system will better serve your hotel’s growth trajectory and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS capable of integrating with multiple partners and supporting complex revenue and housekeeping operations, Infor HMS is the better pick. It’s designed for a variety of hotel types, including boutique, city-center, and independent properties, with a strong emphasis on operational customization.
FOSSE, however, is tailored for Marriott hotels and motels, focusing on internal management efficiency within Marriott’s ecosystem. Its limited reviews, lack of recent feedback, and minimal third-party integrations suggest it’s less suited for hotels outside the Marriott family or those seeking a broader ecosystem. Do you prioritize a system that adapts to your specific needs or one that’s optimized for Marriott’s standards?
If your hotel needs a scalable, customizable system with extensive third-party integrations, go with Infor HMS. Its high review count (46 reviews) and recent feedback, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a 74% likelihood to recommend, strongly support this choice. Infor’s broad regional presence and feature set make it suitable for diverse hotel types.
If your hotel is part of the Marriott portfolio or prefers a proprietary system with basic functionalities and a focus on internal operations, FOSSE may suffice. However, with only one review and a 2/5 rating, FOSSE lacks the validation and user confidence that Infor HMS currently commands. Are you willing to settle for a system with limited third-party support and less recent feedback?
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 in ease of use, reflecting a generally intuitive interface with some room for improvement, especially in aesthetics. Many users find the system straightforward once familiar, aided by a short onboarding process.
FOSSE scores only 2/5, with users describing it as “menu heavy,” lacking a graphical user interface, and requiring significant keystrokes. The system’s retro feel and complex navigation hinder staff adoption, particularly for non-technical staff.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 features exclusive to its platform, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, multi-lingual support, a mobile app, and revenue management tools. These comprehensive features significantly enhance operational control and guest personalization.
FOSSE lacks the breadth of features seen in Infor HMS, offering mainly core reservation and billing functions. It does not list any unique features beyond those typically expected from a basic PMS.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS benefits from a support score of 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, professional assistance and effective onboarding. The vendor’s reputation for quick resolution and ongoing support makes it a reliable choice for hotels that require dependable help.
FOSSE’s support rating is lower, with users describing support as “less responsive” and criticizing the lack of recent feedback or testimonials. Given the complexity of the system, this could be a notable limitation.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue management, CRM, and payment providers. This extensive network allows your team to automate workflows and reduce manual data entry.
FOSSE, with only 2 verified integrations, offers limited connectivity mostly within Marriott’s internal systems. Its narrow integration scope restricts flexibility and scalability.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s overall rating of 4.04/5 is based on 46 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its customizable features and operational efficiency. Hotels across various segments, including boutique and city-center, rate it favorably, with a 74% likelihood to recommend.
FOSSE has only one review, rating it 2/5, with users citing usability issues and a lack of modern interface. The minimal feedback indicates limited user satisfaction outside Marriott’s internal context.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are unavailable publicly, but it is generally tailored to hotel size and requirements, often involving implementation fees and ongoing costs. Its SaaS model typically justifies its investment through enhanced efficiency and revenue potential.
FOSSE, being an internal Marriott system, is not commercially priced for external hotels. It’s designed for internal Marriott use, making its cost structure opaque and less relevant for non-Marrriott properties.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Infor HMS offers a broad, flexible, and well-reviewed PMS designed for diverse hotel types, while FOSSE is an internal Marriott tool with limited feedback and integrations. Infor HMS’s recent reviews, high overall rating, and extensive feature set make it the stronger choice for most hotels today.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel values customization, broad integrations, and proven support. It supports operational efficiency and guest satisfaction in a competitive environment.
Opt for FOSSE only if your hotel is part of Marriott, prioritizes internal management, and does not require extensive third-party connectivity. Its simplicity and internal focus make it less adaptable for hotel operators outside Marriott’s ecosystem.
In summary, for most independent or non-Marriott properties seeking a reliable, feature-rich, and well-reviewed PMS, Infor HMS stands out as the clear choice. Its recent review activity, higher ratings, and extensive integrations demonstrate its capacity to meet diverse hotel needs effectively.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and FOSSE share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and FOSSE share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while FOSSE offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 2.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. FOSSE: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Marriott International has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property