The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
OnRes shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while OnRes users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS by Infor and OnRes PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic goals. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but Infor’s extensive feature set and larger global footprint offer a different experience than OnRes’s simpler, reservation-centric approach. Your decision should be based on the scale of your property, integration needs, and support expectations.
Infor is the more established platform with a broader customer base, more reviews, and recent feedback. OnRes, with fewer reviews and no recent data, might appeal to smaller, less complex operations but lacks the depth of features and regional presence that Infor provides.
Both Infor HMS and OnRes PMS serve as property management systems, but they differ significantly in scope and maturity. Infor offers a comprehensive suite with features like housekeeping, guest CRM, revenue management, and multi-currency support, all integrated into a single system. OnRes provides core reservation and channel management tools with a focus on simplicity and online booking.
Infor’s larger user base and more recent reviews (46 reviews, all within the last 6 months) indicate a proven track record and active development, making it a more reliable choice for hotels looking to scale or optimize complex operations. OnRes's reviews are sparse and outdated, which diminishes confidence in its current performance and support.
Are you seeking a full-featured, globally supported PMS or a straightforward booking system? That choice will define which product better suits your needs.
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, scalable PMS capable of supporting multi-property operations, revenue management, and extensive integrations, Infor is the clear choice. Its strong global presence in regions such as North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, combined with 113 verified integrations (including major partners like Whistle), makes it suitable for larger or multi-location hotels.
On the other hand, if your hotel is smaller, operates primarily online, or prioritizes straightforward reservation management with channel distribution, OnRes might seem attractive. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited regional presence (only North America) suggest it may not evolve as quickly or support complex needs as effectively.
For most hotels seeking a well-supported, mature platform, Infor’s extensive feature set, support responsiveness, and global reach make it the more compelling option.
Infor’s user score (3.88/5) and support rating (4.04/5) reflect generally positive feedback, with reviewers praising its navigation once learned and the responsiveness of support teams. Many users cite a relatively quick onboarding process and the ability to configure screens to match operational flows, making it accessible for staff with basic training.
OnRes, with no recent reviews or detailed user feedback, leaves its ease of use unverified. Its limited presence and lack of recent user insights imply it may lack the polish or user-centric design needed for quick staff adoption.
Edge: Infor.
Infor boasts an impressive list of 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, guest profiles, online support, multi-lingual capabilities, guest CRM, mobile app, multi-currency support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audit. These features cater to complex operations and enable advanced revenue strategies.
OnRes offers reservation and channel management, but lacks the extensive feature set and integrations seen in Infor. Its focus remains on online bookings and basic PMS functions without the depth of operational modules.
Edge: Infor.
Infor's support score of 4.04/5 and positive review comments about their responsiveness and professionalism suggest a reliable support experience. Hoteliers appreciate timely responses and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting.
OnRes’s support data is unavailable, making it difficult to assess. Given its smaller size and limited recent reviews, it’s likely that support may not be as robust or responsive as Infor’s.
Edge: Infor.
Infor’s integration count (113 verified partners) far surpasses OnRes’s 2 verified partners, indicating a mature, flexible ecosystem. Shared integrations include major platforms like Whistle, with many unique partners catering to revenue, distribution, and operational needs.
OnRes’s limited integrations restrict its ability to connect with third-party tools, potentially limiting scalability and operational efficiency. If seamless ecosystem connectivity is a priority, Infor’s extensive partner network is a significant advantage.
Edge: Infor.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor’s average rating of 4.04/5 and a 74% likelihood to recommend demonstrate strong user confidence. Users from diverse hotel segments, including independent and branded hotels, rate it favorably, especially for its customizability and support responsiveness.
OnRes lacks recent reviews and any publicly available ratings, which prevents a meaningful comparison. The absence of recent data suggests less confidence or stability in the product today.
Edge: Infor.
Pricing details for Infor are not publicly available, as it typically involves tailored quotes based on hotel size and requirements. Similarly, OnRes does not disclose specific costs, but it emphasizes affordability and feature-rich offerings.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best approach is to request quotes from both vendors to compare actual costs and value for your hotel’s specific needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor is a feature-rich, globally supported PMS designed for larger or complex hotel operations. Its broad integration network, recent reviews, and extensive feature list make it a dependable choice for hotels seeking operational excellence and scalability.
OnRes offers a simpler, reservation-focused system with strong online booking capabilities, making it suitable for small properties that prioritize digital presence over complex management. However, its limited recent data and fewer integrations reduce confidence in its current viability.
For most hotels aiming for growth, efficiency, and operational flexibility, Infor is the recommended choice. OnRes may serve niche markets or small-scale operations better, but its lack of recent validation makes it a riskier option.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and OnRes PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and OnRes PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while OnRes PMS offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. OnRes PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and OnRes has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor