The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Persefone shines , with exclusive features like Housekeeping Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Persefone users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Persefone boils down to your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and support. Your decision should be guided by which platform aligns best with your property type, geographic reach, and required functionalities.
Infor HMS, with its extensive review base and established presence, offers a proven track record. Persefone, although newer and less reviewed, claims to offer a fully integrated and easy-to-use solution. Which suits your hotel’s growth and operational complexity better?
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based property management system with over 46 reviews and a 4.04/5 overall rating, making it a trusted choice for many hoteliers worldwide. Persefone, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, lacks the social proof needed to confidently recommend it at this stage.
Both systems aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, but Infor’s established reputation and diverse feature set make it more reliable for hotels seeking proven technology. Persefone’s lack of recent user feedback raises questions about its current performance and support quality.
Are you willing to gamble on a newer system with limited recent feedback, or do you prefer a platform with a solid, review-backed track record?
If your hotel needs a multi-region, flexible PMS capable of handling complex operations like revenue management, guest CRM, and multi-currency transactions, go with Infor HMS. It serves a wide variety of hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and branded hotels, and boasts a strong global presence.
On the other hand, if you prioritize an all-in-one, easy-to-use platform with integrated features like a booking engine, channel manager, and housekeeping app, Persefone could be appealing—though its lack of recent reviews suggests caution. Persefone’s $200/month pricing is predictable, but its limited market presence and support options make it better suited for small or regional properties.
In summary, for established reliability and extensive functionality, Infor HMS is the clearer choice. Persefone may appeal if your hotel is in Italy or Europe and values integrated simplicity over proven global support.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding process. Its interface, while functional, is sometimes criticized for lacking visual appeal but appreciated for operational clarity once users adapt.
Persefone, with no recent reviews or user ratings, offers the promise of a straightforward, integrated platform. However, without user feedback, it’s impossible to gauge how intuitive or user-friendly the system truly is.
Edge: Infor.
Infor HMS features 15 unique functionalities, including guest profiles, direct billing, centralized user management, cloud deployment, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features cater to large-scale, complex operations and support multi-currency transactions.
Persefone offers 5 unique features: channel management, booking engine, housekeeping mobile app, real-time status updates, and automated assignments. These are more operationally focused and suited for smaller properties or those seeking integrated management tools.
Infor wins with its broader, more advanced feature set. Persefone provides essential modules but lacks the depth of Infor’s offerings.
Edge: Infor.
Infor HMS is rated 4.04/5 for customer support, with multiple reviews emphasizing promptness, professionalism, and helpfulness. Support staff are praised for guiding users through issues quickly, which is critical for resolving software glitches.
Persefone, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides limited publicly available support insights. Its smaller size and lack of review data suggest support may not match Infor’s standards, especially across diverse regions.
Edge: Infor.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, facilitating seamless reservation management. Its extensive partner network supports complex systems integration, critical for larger hotels.
Persefone has no verified integrations listed, which limits its ability to connect with external systems. This could restrict operational flexibility and scalability, particularly for hotels relying on multiple third-party tools.
Edge: Infor.
Infor’s 46 reviews with an average rating of 4.04/5 reflect a generally positive reception, especially among boutique and independent hotels. Recent reviews consistently praise its customization, support, and operational efficiency.
Persefone has no recent reviews, so there’s no reliable data on user satisfaction. Its lack of feedback makes it difficult to assess how hoteliers perceive its value or usability.
Edge: Infor.
Infor does not publicly list pricing, which is typical for enterprise solutions. Its implementation fees and licensing costs are likely variable based on hotel size and needs.
Persefone charges a fixed $200/month, with no mention of setup or additional fees. Its straightforward pricing may appeal to smaller hotels but could lack flexibility for larger operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Infor HMS offers an established, comprehensive, and adaptable PMS suitable for varied and larger properties. Persefone, while promising an all-in-one, easy-to-use suite, suffers from a lack of recent reviews and limited integration options.
If your hotel looks for a reliable, feature-rich platform with proven support and international reach, Infor HMS is the clear choice. Persefone may suit smaller, regional hotels willing to accept limited third-party support and a lesser-known market presence, but caution is advised given the limited recent feedback.
For most hotels seeking a stable, highly functional PMS backed by a substantial user base, Infor HMS stands out as the safer, more evidence-backed option.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Persefone share 5 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Persefone share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Persefone offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Persefone: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Persefone has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor