The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Megasys shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Megasys users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Megasys |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's daily operations and guest experience. Both Infor HMS and Portfolio HMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge in maturity, feature depth, and regional presence. Infor HMS benefits from a robust track record, extensive integrations, and a large user base, while Portfolio HMS remains less proven but offers promising functionalities. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s size, location, and operational needs?
Infor HMS stands out with its mature platform, boasting a 4.04/5 overall rating based on 46 recent reviews, and a strong presence across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Its feature set includes extensive modules like housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Portfolio HMS, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or established market presence, which leaves its reliability and feature depth unverified.
Both systems are designed to automate reservations, streamline housekeeping, and manage guest profiles, but Infor’s broader integrations and cloud support make it more adaptable to complex operations. Portfolio’s offerings are less transparent, with no verified integrations or customer feedback, raising questions about its scalability and support. Does your hotel need proven stability and a wide partner network? Or are you willing to explore a less established system?
Your hotel should select Infor HMS if operational efficiency, extensive integrations, and regional support matter most. It’s ideal for mid-sized to large hotels looking for a mature, customizable PMS with a broad feature set and a solid reputation. Portfolio HMS might appeal to smaller or boutique hotels willing to take a chance on an unproven product, especially if they prioritize simplicity and are in regions where Portfolio is more accessible.
If your hotel needs a system with proven reliability, ongoing support, and a wealth of features, Infor is the clear choice. Conversely, if your hotel is open to a newer, less validated platform that could offer specific niche benefits, Portfolio might be worth exploring, but this comes with higher risk.
Based on available ratings, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with positive notes about its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding; some users find it slightly technical but manageable. Its onboarding process is rated at 3.64/5, and support is commended for responsiveness, which eases staff adoption. Portfolio HMS provides no publicly available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Without user feedback, the ease of use remains uncertain.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, a calendar view, direct billing, multi-currency, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features cater to hotels needing detailed control, automation, and multi-lingual support. Portfolio HMS’s features are less documented, with no verified feature list or customer reviews to confirm its capabilities.
Given Infor’s extensive feature set and proven modules, it clearly provides more functional depth. Portfolio HMS’s potential advantages remain speculative due to the lack of detailed information. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS earns a 4.04/5 support rating from 46 reviews, with hoteliers praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpfulness during onboarding and problem resolution. Many reviewers mention prompt, supportive interactions that help them quickly resolve issues. Portfolio HMS provides no recent reviews or support ratings, making its customer service reputation unverified.
Since support quality often determines how smoothly your hotel operates with new software, Infor’s established record is a decisive advantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including key booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, enabling seamless reservation management and reducing manual tasks. It also connects with revenue management tools and other operational systems, providing a flexible ecosystem. Portfolio HMS has no verified integrations reported, leaving its compatibility with existing hotel systems uncertain.
For hotels that rely on external integrations or plan to scale, Infor’s extensive partner network offers a significant advantage. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor HMS’s average rating of 4.04/5 indicates strong user satisfaction. Hotels in the independent, boutique, and branded segments have rated it favorably, citing its customization and support. Portfolio HMS lacks recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or segment-specific feedback.
Given Infor’s established reputation and recent review activity, hoteliers clearly favor it. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both systems are not publicly disclosed, which is common for enterprise solutions. Infor HMS typically involves a customized quote based on hotel size and modules, while Portfolio HMS’s pricing remains unverified. Expect Infor to have a significant investment, especially for larger properties, but precise costs depend on your specific needs.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or seeking a simple, off-the-shelf solution without extensive customization.
Not ideal if you need a mature, extensively supported platform with proven integrations or if your hotel operates in highly regulated markets.
Infor HMS is a mature, well-supported platform with a broad feature set, extensive integrations, and strong regional presence, making it a safe choice for most hotels. It excels in automating complex operations, improving revenue management, and supporting diverse property types.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel demands stability, scalability, and proven functionalities. It’s especially suitable for mid-sized and large properties, or hotels operating across multiple regions seeking comprehensive support.
Portfolio HMS, while promising, currently lacks the market presence, recent reviews, and verified features to confidently recommend. It might fit smaller boutique operations or hotels willing to experiment with newer technology, but the risks are higher.
In summary, for hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS with active support and proven results, Infor HMS remains the superior option. Portfolio HMS might appeal to specific niche segments but requires careful consideration due to its limited verified track record.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Portfolio HMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Megasys |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Portfolio HMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Portfolio HMS offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Portfolio HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Megasys has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor