The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Box shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Box users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Box |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Sign Request by Box for your hotel’s property management needs hinges on what specific problems you want to solve. Infor HMS offers a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS built for operational efficiency, while Box’s Sign Request is primarily a digital signature tool with limited hotel-specific features. Both aim to streamline workflows, but Infor’s core focus is on property management, whereas Box targets document signing. The question is: which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products serve different purposes—Infor HMS as a full PMS, and Sign Request as a document management solution. If your goal is to modernize operations and improve guest service through automation, Infor is the clear choice. However, if your hotel needs to digitize contracts and approvals, Sign Request might be tempting. But given your focus on property management, which solution truly addresses your core needs?
Infor HMS is designed as a full property management system, offering features like housekeeping, guest profiles, revenue management, and multi-lingual support that are essential for hotel operations. Sign Request, by contrast, is a specialized digital signature platform suitable for signing contracts and approvals but lacks the core operational features hotels need daily.
Infor’s existing review base and recent feedback indicate a strong, steady performance with 46 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.04/5, and consistent praise for its scalability and customization. Sign Request, with no publicly available reviews or ratings specific to hotel use, doesn’t provide evidence of hotel-specific performance or adoption.
Given this contrast, your decision should lean heavily towards the product with proven hotel industry relevance. Are you seeking a comprehensive PMS or a digital signature tool? The answer clearly favors Infor HMS for hotel operations.
Infor HMS’s user interface has a rating of 3.88/5, with many users noting it is generally easy to navigate once familiar with its format. Support during onboarding is rated at 3.64/5, indicating a decent but not exceptional initial user experience. Users highlight the system's customization ability as a strength, though some mention occasional glitches during updates that can hinder usability.
In contrast, Sign Request, as a dedicated document signing platform, is inherently simple to use, often rated highly for ease of signing and document management. However, since it’s not a comprehensive PMS, it doesn’t require extensive staff training for hotel operations.
Considering the complexity of PMS functionality, Infor HMS’s usability is more critical for your team. While it has a moderate ease-of-use score, its familiarity and customization features support daily hotel management tasks.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 exclusive features, including housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, calendar views, direct billing, multi-currency handling, revenue management, and automated night audits—features central to hotel operations. Sign Request offers no hotel-specific features, functioning solely as a digital signature tool.
None of Sign Request’s features overlap with Infor, but the latter’s extensive capabilities directly impact your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. The sheer number and relevance of features make Infor significantly more functional for your needs.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has a customer support rating of 4.04/5, with reviews often praising their responsiveness and professionalism. Users appreciate the support team’s quick responses and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is vital in a complex PMS environment.
Sign Request, lacking hotel-specific reviews, does not have publicly available support ratings or user feedback relevant to hotel use. Given the importance of dependable support for a PMS, Infor’s well-rated service offers more reassurance.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, as well as revenue management and accounting tools. These integrations are vital for streamlining hotel operations and data flow.
Sign Request has no listed integrations or verified partner network, limiting its utility for hotel operations that depend on interconnected systems. For a hotel looking to connect various operational tools, Infor’s extensive integration ecosystem is a clear advantage.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 reviews and a recent review count of zero, Infor HMS’s rating of 4.04/5 reflects medium-high user satisfaction, especially among independent and boutique hotels. Hoteliers highlight its customization, operational efficiency, and responsive support as key strengths.
Sign Request lacks hotel-specific reviews, making it impossible to assess how hoteliers perceive it. Since hotel decision-makers rely on peer feedback, the superior review profile of Infor HMS makes it the more trusted option in the industry.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise-level PMS solutions often customized per hotel. Screen-based or monthly fees are not listed, and implementation costs may vary.
Sign Request’s pricing is also not published, as it generally operates on a subscription model that is transparent for document signing solutions, but not tailored to hotel needs.
Given the lack of explicit pricing data, your best approach is to request quotes from both vendors. However, the robust feature set and industry reputation of Infor HMS suggest it is a more substantial investment aligned with hotel operational goals.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Infor HMS offers a complete hotel property management system, while Sign Request is a document signing platform. Infor’s extensive features and integrations make it suitable for hotels focused on operational excellence, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth.
Choose Infor HMS if your hotel requires a scalable, feature-rich PMS that can streamline daily tasks, improve communication, and provide actionable insights. It is especially suited for hotels looking to upgrade their operational infrastructure with proven industry tools.
Opt for Sign Request only if your hotel’s primary need is digital signatures for contracts or approvals, and you do not require a broader property management solution. Its utility is limited outside of document workflows.
In conclusion: If your hotel’s goal is to optimize guest experience, automate operations, and connect with industry tools, Infor HMS is the clear choice. For basic document signing needs, Sign Request might suffice, but it won’t support your broader property management objectives.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Sign Request share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Box |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Sign Request share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Sign Request offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Sign Request: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Box has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor