The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Smart Finder shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Smart Finder users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Soraso hinges on your hotel's specific needs, as both aim to streamline operations but differ vastly in maturity and scope. Infor HMS, a well-established property management system, offers extensive features and a sizable user base, while Soraso is a newer, less-reviewed solution with limited market presence. Your decision ultimately depends on what your hotel prioritizes—comprehensive functionality or a lightweight, emerging system.
Infor HMS is a recognized player with nearly 47 reviews, a high overall rating of 4.04/5, and recent feedback, making it the more reliable choice today. Soraso, with no recent reviews or detailed data, remains a less proven option. Do you want a tried-and-true platform or are you willing to experiment with a lesser-known solution?
Infor HMS tackles core hotel management challenges like reservations, housekeeping, revenue tracking, and guest profiles with a broad feature set. Soraso appears to focus on a simplified, perhaps more affordable approach, but lacks detailed features or user feedback to verify its effectiveness. Given Infor’s 46 reviews and recent positive ratings, it offers proven stability and depth, whereas Soraso’s absence of recent reviews indicates an untested track record.
The main divergence lies in maturity and scope: Infor’s system is comprehensive with 20 unique features like automated night audit and multi-currency support, while Soraso’s capabilities remain unverified. Infor’s extensive integrations, support network, and global presence contrast sharply with Soraso’s minimal verified partnerships. Are you looking for a reliable, feature-rich platform or a potential lightweight alternative with no proven track record?
If your hotel needs a full-featured property management system that integrates with multiple partners, handles complex revenue management, and offers scalable modules, go with Infor HMS. Its established reputation, dedicated support, and extensive feature set suit mid-to-large hotels, especially those seeking operational efficiency.
If your hotel is a small operation seeking a potentially lower-cost, minimal system and is comfortable with unverified support and limited reviews, Soraso might appeal. However, due to the lack of recent feedback and proven functionality, Infor HMS remains the safer, more comprehensive choice for most hotels aiming for stability and growth.
Infor HMS is rated 3.88/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive navigation and quick onboarding, supported by a well-established support team. Users mention that once familiar, staff find the system straightforward, though initial setup may require some training.
Soraso, lacking detailed user ratings or reviews, makes it difficult to assess usability. Its minimal presence and absence of feedback suggest it may not have a polished user experience or extensive onboarding resources. Based on available data, edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS clearly leads with 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, direct billing, revenue management, and mobile capabilities. Soraso’s feature count and specifics remain unknown, with no verified features listed, making it impossible to compare directly.
With Infor’s comprehensive feature set and clear benefits, it’s the more capable system for hotels requiring detailed operational control. Soraso’s lack of feature transparency makes it unsuitable for hotels needing a reliable, feature-rich management platform. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts a support rating of 4.04/5, with reviews highlighting its promptness, professionalism, and helpful guidance during onboarding and troubleshooting. Users describe the support team as "responsive" and "reliable," crucial for resolving issues efficiently.
Soraso’s support quality remains unreviewed and unverified, leaving uncertainty about its responsiveness or expertise. In the absence of concrete data, Infor’s established reputation for support clearly edges out Soraso. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking engines and revenue systems like IDeaS and Fairmas, enhancing operational connectivity. Soraso’s verified partner count is just 2, with Hoteliers.Guru being the only listed integration.
This extensive ecosystem makes Infor HMS highly adaptable to diverse hotel operations, whereas Soraso’s limited integrations suggest a more isolated or early-stage platform. For hotels prioritizing broad connectivity, Infor HMS is the clear winner. Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 reviews and recent feedback, Infor HMS averages 4.04/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 74%. Hotels across segments, especially independent and boutique properties, appreciate its comprehensive features and support.
Soraso’s lack of recent reviews and overall absence of feedback make it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on available data, hoteliers favor Infor HMS, especially those seeking proven reliability. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly disclosed; it likely involves a custom quote based on hotel size and configuration. Soraso’s pricing remains unavailable, but the lack of transparency and reviews suggests it may be a more affordable, or at least less established, option.
Given Infor’s enterprise-grade reputation, expect a higher investment but also a more comprehensive solution. Soraso might appeal to smaller hotels with tighter budgets but at the risk of limited support and features. Edge: Infor HMS (due to transparency and reputation).
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, budget-constrained, or seeking only a simple management tool with minimal features.
Not ideal if you require proven support, extensive features, or integration capabilities.
Infor HMS is a mature, feature-rich property management system with a proven track record, especially in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Its broad integration network, detailed modules, and positive recent reviews make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking operational excellence.
Soraso remains an untested option with no recent reviews, limited integration options, and unknown features. It might appeal to very small properties or experimental operators, but for most hotels, Infor HMS delivers more certainty and value.
In summary: If your hotel needs a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with a proven record and extensive features, Infor HMS is the clear choice. If your hotel’s priorities are minimal features, budget, or experimental use, Soraso could be considered—but with caution.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Soraso share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Soraso share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Soraso offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Soraso: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Smart Finder has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor