The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Tesipro shines , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Tesipro users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel can significantly impact your operations and guest experience. Infor HMS by Infor and Tesipro by Tesipro both aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. Your decision hinges on factors like feature depth, user support, regional presence, and the specific needs of your hotel. Are you looking for a system with a proven track record and broader user feedback? Or do you need a solution tailored for independent properties with quick setup? Let’s compare them comprehensively.
Both Infor HMS and Tesipro serve as hotel property management systems, but they differ widely in scope and maturity. Infor HMS, with over 46 reviews and a recent active user base, offers a broad feature set, including revenue management and ancillary revenue tracking. Tesipro, however, has no recent reviews and a smaller footprint, making it less verified in terms of user feedback. While Infor’s platform is more established, Tesipro claims to connect quickly with major providers, promising streamlined setup.
The core divergence lies in their regional presence and review activity. Infor’s global footprint and recent user reviews make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven performance, whereas Tesipro’s limited recent reviews limit confidence. Does your hotel prioritize a well-supported, tested system, or do you seek a newer, potentially flexible platform?
If your hotel needs a mature property management system with extensive integrations, customizable reporting, and a strong support network, go with Infor HMS. It’s especially suitable for hotels that value operational efficiency, revenue management, and scalability, backed by over 46 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 4.04/5.
If your hotel is an independent property or a large group looking for quick setup and integration with key providers, Tesipro might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews and a limited feature set, it’s less proven. For now, Infor offers a more reliable choice for hotels aiming to optimize daily operations with a trusted platform.
Based on available ratings, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation once familiar and short onboarding times. Support responsiveness and user-friendly features contribute positively, though some users note the interface could be more visually appealing.
Tesipro’s ease of use remains unverified due to a lack of recent reviews, leaving uncertainty about its UI and onboarding experience. Without recent data, we can’t confidently recommend it for simplicity or staff adoption.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 15 shared features, with five exclusive functionalities like revenue management, guest profiles, and on-premise deployment. Tesipro boasts a larger suite of 29 exclusive features, including a Spa & Wellness Module, Channel Manager, Booking Engine, EPoS, Guest Messaging, and Online Check-in.
While Tesipro’s extensive features cover many operational needs, the absence of recent reviews raises questions about their stability and integration quality. Infor’s core features are proven, and its unique modules focus on revenue and guest management.
Edge: Tesipro.
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews praising their responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful guidance during issues. Support is highlighted as a key strength, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, with many reviewers noting quick resolution times.
Conversely, Tesipro’s support ratings are unavailable, and no recent reviews mention their service quality. This lack of recent feedback makes it difficult to assess their support capabilities confidently.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Onity. Shared integrations with Tesipro include 14 partners, covering vital connections like Booking.com, Civitfun, and Zafiro, but they lack the extensive network Infor provides.
Having more integrations means your hotel can connect with a broader ecosystem, simplifying operations and data flow. Infor’s extensive partner list offers more flexibility for diverse operational needs.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Given the data, Infor HMS’s overall rating of 4.04/5 based on 46 reviews makes it the more credible and tested option. The reviews cover a wide range of hotel segments, from independent to branded hotels, with high ratings especially from larger or mid-sized hotels.
Tesipro has no recent reviews, so we cannot accurately gauge user satisfaction. With no data, it’s reasonable to conclude that Infor’s established reputation makes it the more highly rated choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor does not publicly disclose its pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on your hotel’s size and needs. Tesipro charges a flat fee of $1,300.00, but there’s no information about ongoing subscription costs or additional fees.
Given the lack of transparency from Infor, budget-conscious hotels should seek a detailed quote. Tesipro provides a straightforward entry point but may lack the flexibility or scalability for larger properties.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, aesthetic interface or have a very limited budget.
Not ideal if you require proven reliability, recent user feedback, or extensive regional support, especially outside North America and Europe.
The core difference lies in their maturity and review activity. Infor HMS has a well-established presence, with more recent reviews, a high overall rating, and a broad network of integrations. Tesipro offers a larger feature list, but its lack of recent feedback raises questions about its current performance.
Choose Infor if you need a reliable, widely supported system with proven support and integration. Opt for Tesipro if your hotel values an extensive feature set and faster deployment, but be aware of the lack of recent user validation.
For most hotels seeking stability, proven functionality, and extensive support, Infor HMS is the stronger choice. Tesipro may appeal if your hotel is comfortable with less market feedback and wants a feature-rich platform that connects quickly with key providers.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Tesipro share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 22 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Tesipro share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Tesipro offers 25. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Tesipro: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Tesipro has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor