The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Check-in shines , with exclusive features like Booking Engine and Channel Manager.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Check-in users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and The Alpha hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both systems aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences but diverge significantly in features, market focus, and support. Infor HMS, with its robust integration capabilities and broader global presence, appeals to hotels seeking a scalable, enterprise-level PMS. Meanwhile, The Alpha targets independent and Latin American hotels with its modular, user-friendly design. Which system aligns better with your hotel's specific requirements?
Both Infor HMS and The Alpha serve as comprehensive property management systems, but their core strengths differ. Infor HMS offers extensive integration options, advanced reporting, and features like centralized user management, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. Conversely, The Alpha emphasizes modularity, simplicity, and customization, catering well to independent hotels and resorts that prefer straightforward solutions. Do you prioritize broad integrations and automation, or flexibility and ease of use?
Infor HMS has a higher overall rating (4.04/5 from 46 reviews) and more recent feedback, indicating active, current user engagement. The Alpha, with no recent reviews, lacks up-to-date validation, making Infor’s current performance data more reliable. Does your team value a solution with a proven track record and ongoing support?
If your hotel needs a globally scalable PMS with extensive integrations, robust reporting, and advanced revenue management, go with Infor HMS. It’s well-suited for properties seeking deep customization, multi-currency support, and cloud deployment, especially if you operate across regions.
If your hotel is an independent property, resort, or inn looking for a straightforward, modular system with essential modules like booking, revenue, and BI, The Alpha is a viable choice. It provides flexible deployment options—local or cloud—and is designed for ease of use without overwhelming complexity.
Hotels that require multi-language support, group functionality, or centralized user management should lean toward Infor HMS. Conversely, hotels that prioritize simplicity, affordability, and local deployment may find The Alpha more aligned with their needs.
Infor HMS garners a high ease-of-use rating (3.88/5) based on user reviews, emphasizing intuitive navigation once the system’s format is understood. Support and onboarding are generally rated positively at 4.04/5, with users praising responsiveness and helpful guidance during implementation. Some reviews note occasional bugs during updates, but support swiftly resolves issues.
The Alpha, lacking recent review data, makes it difficult to gauge current usability. However, its emphasis on modularity and simplicity suggests a user-friendly experience for hotels without complex needs.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 10 shared features plus 10 unique ones, including direct billing, multi-lingual support, mobile app access, cloud deployment, guest CRM, and multi-currency handling. These features support complex operations, automation, and scalability essential for larger or multi-property hotels.
The Alpha provides key modules such as Booking Engine, Channel Manager, Revenue Management, and Business Intelligence. However, it lacks many of the advanced features available in Infor HMS and has fewer total features.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support receives favorable reviews, with a 4.04/5 rating, and users highlight the quick, professional assistance they receive. Support staff are praised for their responsiveness, especially when resolving issues during updates, making it easier for your team to maintain operations.
The Alpha lacks recent customer support ratings and reviews, so it's unclear how current users perceive their support quality. Based on available data, Infor’s support is more established and reliable.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified integrations, including partners like eRevMax, Priority Software, Trevo, and HQ Revenue. Its extensive partner network supports seamless integration with booking engines, revenue tools, and other operational systems.
The Alpha has only one verified partner, with no other integrations clearly listed. For hotels relying on multiple integrations for automation and operational efficiency, Infor HMS is the superior option.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews, Infor HMS has an average rating of 4.04/5, indicating generally positive user experiences. Hotels across various segments, especially independent and boutique hotels, rate it favorably for its feature set and support.
The Alpha’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess current user satisfaction. Given the active review base, Infor HMS’s ratings are more trustworthy.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed. Neither offers a freemium model or visible subscription plans, suggesting custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Expect to contact vendors for tailored pricing.
Not ideal if you are a small independent hotel with minimal tech needs or budget constraints.
Not ideal if you require comprehensive integrations, advanced reporting, or operations across multiple regions.
Infor HMS provides a comprehensive, scalable PMS with extensive features, integrations, and strong support, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. Its higher review count and recent feedback endorse its ongoing performance and user satisfaction.
The Alpha offers a simpler, modular approach tailored to independent or regional hotels, especially in Latin America. However, the lack of recent reviews limits confidence in its current usability and support quality.
If you value proven, feature-rich solutions with global reach and active user feedback, Infor HMS is the clear winner. For hotels seeking a straightforward, budget-friendly system with regional focus, The Alpha might suffice—though more recent user experiences are needed to confirm its viability.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and The Alpha share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-lingual |
Showing top differences. 1 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and The Alpha share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while The Alpha offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. The Alpha: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Check-in has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor