The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Tokeet shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Tokeet users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Tokeet hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, scale, and operational complexity. Both systems aim to optimize property management, but their core functionalities and target audiences differ significantly. Infor HMS, with its extensive feature set and global presence, is built for larger, multi-property hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. Tokeet, primarily designed for vacation rentals and smaller property portfolios, offers streamlined automation but lacks the breadth of Infor. Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic operations?
Infor HMS is the clear leader for hotels seeking a full-featured property management system backed by a substantial review base and recent positive feedback. Its 46 reviews over the past six months, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a high likelihood to recommend (74%), demonstrate its ongoing relevance and reliability. Tokeet, despite its niche focus and integrations, has no recent reviews or user ratings to substantiate its capabilities. For hotels prioritizing proven performance and support, Infor is the stronger choice.
Both products aim to streamline property management but serve different segments. Infor HMS offers an all-in-one platform with over 20 unique features, including guest CRM, revenue management, automated night audit, and extensive integrations. It caters to hotels that require customization, multi-language support, and scalability. Conversely, Tokeet targets vacation rental operators with a focus on channel management, booking synchronization, and automation for small property portfolios.
Infor’s strengths lie in its broad feature set and global presence, supporting regions like Asia Pacific, North America, Europe, and the Middle East. It’s suited for hotels that need detailed reporting, revenue optimization, and multi-currency support. Tokeet’s simplicity and niche focus mean fewer features but potentially easier setup and use, particularly for smaller operators managing a handful of properties.
However, Tokeet has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it difficult to gauge ongoing support and effectiveness. Infor’s latest reviews show consistent satisfaction, especially regarding customization and integration capabilities. Given the review volume and recency, Infor’s credibility and ongoing development are stronger. Are you prepared to prioritize a system with extensive features and proven support over a more simplified, less-reviewed platform?
If your hotel needs a robust, multi-property management solution capable of automating complex operations, choose Infor HMS. Its 46 recent reviews, with an average rating of 4.04/5, highlight strengths in customization, integration, and support, making it suitable for large or upscale hotels aiming for operational excellence.
If your hotel operates primarily as a vacation rental or has a small portfolio, and you value ease of use and automation, Tokeet might seem appealing. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited features make it more of a niche solution, less proven in current hotel management contexts.
For larger hotels or chains looking for customizable, scalable solutions that support revenue management, housekeeping, and multi-lingual operations, Infor is the reliable choice. Smaller operators seeking quick setup and channel management might consider Tokeet, but without recent feedback, its ongoing reliability remains uncertain.
Infor HMS has a user-friendly interface with an average ease-of-use rating of 3.88/5 based on 46 recent reviews. Users appreciate its intuitive navigation, especially the housekeeping module and customizable dashboards, which streamline daily operations. Its onboarding process is generally smooth, but some users report bugs during updates that temporarily hinder usability.
Tokeet, lacking recent reviews and detailed user feedback, cannot be thoroughly assessed for ease of use. Its interface is reportedly simple for vacation rental management, but without current reviews, confidence in its user experience is limited.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts an impressive suite of 20 exclusive features, including a housekeeping module, online 24/7 support, guest profiles, centralized user management, multi-currency, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These capabilities support larger, more complex hotel operations.
Tokeet offers essential vacation rental features like booking management, channel management, and guest communications but lacks the extensive management modules found in Infor. Its feature set is more streamlined, primarily targeting small property portfolios.
Given the breadth and depth, Infor’s features clearly outperform Tokeet’s. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support ratings are strong, with an average score of 4.04/5, and reviews frequently praise their responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers appreciate the prompt assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is critical for complex systems.
Tokeet, with no recent reviews or available support ratings, leaves its support quality unverified. Its limited presence in the hotel management space and lack of recent feedback suggest uncertainty around ongoing support levels.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers integration with 113 verified partners, including major booking and revenue management platforms like Duve, HQ Revenue, and Fairmas. Its extensive partner network enables seamless management across a broad spectrum of operational systems.
Tokeet has only 3 verified partners, with shared integrations like Duve, and a few unique ones such as HKeeper and ChargeAutomation. Its limited integration ecosystem makes it less adaptable for hotels requiring diverse system connectivity.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Based on recent data, Infor HMS’s 46 reviews with a 4.04/5 rating and 74% likelihood to recommend indicate consistent satisfaction among hotelier users, especially in upscale and boutique segments. Hotels in North America and Europe rate it higher, reflecting its effectiveness in large-scale operations.
Tokeet lacks recent reviews and ratings, rendering any comparison speculative. Its absence from recent feedback means we cannot confidently gauge user satisfaction or property segment preferences.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing specifics for Infor HMS are not publicly disclosed, which is typical for enterprise systems. Implementation fees, monthly rates, or per-room charges are not specified, so interested hotels need to request a quote.
Tokeet also does not publicly list prices but appears to follow a subscription model without a free tier or trial options. Both products require direct inquiry, so budgeting depends on negotiation and hotel size.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, well-supported property management system suitable for hotels seeking deep customization, extensive integrations, and operational automation. Its broad feature set, recent positive reviews, and global deployment make it the clear choice for larger hotels and chains.
Tokeet, with its focus on vacation rentals and small portfolios, offers simplicity and automation but lacks recent validation through reviews. Its limited features and integration options are less suitable for larger or more complex hotel operations.
If your hotel values proven performance backed by recent reviews, Infor HMS is the better option. For small-scale, straightforward property management, Tokeet could suffice, but caution is advised due to the absence of recent user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Tokeet share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Tokeet share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Tokeet offers 3. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Tokeet: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Tokeet has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor