The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
Yohobeds shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Yohobeds users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be pivotal for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Infor HMS by Infor and Yohobeds by Yohobeds aim to streamline operations, but their offerings differ significantly. Infor HMS is a mature, feature-rich platform with a proven track record, while Yohobeds remains relatively untested with limited reviews. How do these differences impact your decision?
Both Infor HMS and Yohobeds address core hotel management needs like booking, guest profiles, and operational tracking. However, Infor HMS offers a broad suite of features—over 20 unique modules including housekeeping, revenue management, and online support—making it suitable for hotels seeking comprehensive tools. Yohobeds, with no verified features or recent reviews, appears to be a basic or emerging product lacking demonstrated capabilities. Are you comfortable with a less proven solution, or do you prefer a system backed by extensive reviews and proven features?
Infor HMS has been reviewed by 46 hotels in the last six months, with an overall score of 4.04/5, suggesting solid user satisfaction. Yohobeds has no recent reviews, leaving its reliability and performance uncertain. Do you want a product with recent, real-world validation, or are you exploring options more broadly?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, scalable PMS with a proven track record, Infor HMS is the clear choice. Its suite of 20+ features—like integrated housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual support—suits mid-to-large hotels or properties aiming to streamline multiple departments. Yohobeds might appeal to smaller, less complex properties or startups testing new solutions, but without recent reviews or verified features, its suitability is uncertain.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, ongoing support, and extensive integrations, Infor offers a safer, more validated option. Conversely, Yohobeds could be considered for small operations or those willing to experiment with a less proven platform.
Based on available data, Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation once familiar. It also has a relatively short onboarding process rated at 3.64/5, with support staff praised for responsiveness. Yohobeds, lacking review data, makes it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience.
Given Infor’s established user base and recent review activity, it’s likely a more reliable option for staff training and adoption. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts a suite of 20 features exclusive to it, including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, direct billing, multi-currency, revenue management, and automated night audits—covering nearly every operational aspect. Yohobeds offers no specified features or modules, making it impossible to compare feature sets directly.
With Infor’s extensive feature list, your team gains tools to automate tasks, customize reports, and manage revenue more effectively. Yohobeds’s lack of documented features puts it at a disadvantage for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS scores 4.04/5 for customer support, with reviews emphasizing promptness and professionalism. Hoteliers appreciate the quick, helpful responses, particularly during onboarding and unexpected issues, though some mention bugs during updates. Yohobeds has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess its service quality.
Given the importance of reliable support for daily operations, Infor’s established support reputation makes it the safer choice for hotels that rely on consistent system uptime. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major booking platforms like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, plus revenue management and payment processors. Yohobeds reports zero verified integrations, raising questions about its connectivity and flexibility.
For hotels needing extensive, proven integrations that reduce manual effort and improve data accuracy, Infor HMS is clearly superior. Yohobeds may require additional development to match this level of connectivity. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 46 recent reviews, with an overall rating of 4.04/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 74%. Ratings are higher among independent hotels (4.18/5) and boutique hotels (4.19/5), indicating strong satisfaction across segments. Yohobeds has no recent reviews, so there is no data to gauge user sentiment.
The high volume of recent reviews for Infor HMS indicates ongoing user engagement and trust. Yohobeds’s lack of review data suggests it is less established or less tested in the field. Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, which is common for enterprise solutions—likely customized based on property size and needs. Yohobeds also does not list specific pricing, implying potential variability or a need for direct inquiry.
In either case, expect to negotiate a custom quote. However, Infor’s established market presence suggests more transparency in its pricing structure over Yohobeds.
Infor HMS and Yohobeds cater to different hotel segments and operational needs. Infor HMS, with its 46 recent reviews and a 4.04/5 rating, is a well-established PMS suited for properties that require a broad range of features, integrations, and support. Yohobeds, lacking recent reviews and verified features, appears more suited for small, simple operations or startups willing to experiment.
Choose Infor HMS if you want a mature, full-featured platform with proven reliability and extensive integrations. Yohobeds might appeal if your hotel is small, budget-sensitive, and you’re exploring basic property management solutions.
For hotels prioritizing stability, proven features, and support, Infor HMS is the safer, more reliable choice. If your operation is minimal and you are willing to accept the risk of an untested platform, Yohobeds could be an option, though the lack of recent data is a concern.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Yohobeds share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Yohobeds |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Yohobeds share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Yohobeds offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Yohobeds: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Yohobeds has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor