The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest profiles.
ZHARA shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while ZHARA users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and ZHARA hinges on your hotel’s operational priorities and technological needs. Infor HMS, a mature property management system with over 46 reviews and recent positive feedback, aims to streamline daily operations and enhance guest experiences. ZHARA, on the other hand, specializes in revenue management with a focus on pricing optimization, but its limited reviews and lack of recent feedback make it a less proven choice for full PMS needs.
Both products serve different core functions: Infor HMS provides a comprehensive PMS, while ZHARA focuses on revenue analytics. Your decision should reflect whether operational efficiency or revenue maximization is your main goal.
Infor HMS offers a broad array of features designed to manage hotel operations—from housekeeping to guest profiles and integrated financial modules—making it suitable for properties seeking an all-in-one management solution. ZHARA, however, centers on revenue management through AI-driven analytics, aiming to help hotels fine-tune pricing strategies and improve profitability.
Infor HMS has a more established presence, with 46 reviews, predominantly recent, and an overall rating of 4.04/5, suggesting a stable, trusted system. ZHARA’s zero reviews and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to assess real-world performance, especially outside niche revenue management contexts.
Are you looking for a system that handles day-to-day operations or one that primarily boosts your revenue strategies?
If your hotel needs a full-featured property management system capable of integrating operations like housekeeping, guest profiles, billing, and revenue management, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It supports multi-lingual interfaces, cloud deployment, and has extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels that prioritize operational control and scalability.
If your primary focus is refining pricing, tracking sales trends, and maximizing revenue through data-driven insights, ZHARA’s AI-driven modules may appeal. However, with no reviews or proven track record, it’s risky to rely solely on its revenue management capabilities without a solid PMS component.
For most hotels, especially those seeking proven operational tools, Infor HMS aligns better with your needs. ZHARA’s niche appeal may suit revenue managers but isn’t enough for comprehensive hotel management.
Infor HMS scores a 3.88/5 in ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive navigation and reasonable onboarding process. Users appreciate the ability to configure screens for operational workflows, making daily management straightforward, although some mention occasional interface clutter.
ZHARA, lacking any published user interface ratings or reviews, offers no concrete data on usability. Its AI summary reviews and recommendations suggest a user-friendly dashboard, but without user feedback, this remains speculative.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS boasts 20 unique features including a housekeeping module, online support, guest profiles, calendar views, direct billing, multi-lingual options, cloud deployment, multi-currency support, payment processing, revenue management, and automated night audits. These features address nearly every operational aspect of a hotel.
ZHARA offers no listed features beyond its AI-driven sales analytics and revenue optimization tools. Its singular focus on revenue management limits its scope for hotels seeking a full PMS.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS’s support receives a 4.04/5 rating, with reviews praising responsiveness and professionalism. One reviewer mentioned, “The support team is always quick and helpful,” highlighting reliability in resolving issues.
ZHARA provides no publicly available reviews or ratings about customer support, leaving its service quality unverified. Without evidence of support excellence, ZHARA’s customer service remains an open question.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including prominent booking engines like Booking.com and Expedia, plus revenue management, CRM, and payment solutions. In contrast, ZHARA has no listed integrations or partner connections, limiting its compatibility with existing hotel systems.
For hotels relying on diverse operational platforms, Infor HMS’s extensive integration network offers a major advantage, ensuring smooth data flow and operational consistency.
Edge: Infor HMS.
With 46 recent reviews and a 74% likelihood to recommend, hoteliers rate Infor HMS higher overall. Its property segment ratings are particularly strong among independent and boutique hotels, with an average score of 4.18/5.
ZHARA has no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific ratings.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable on the public domain. Infor HMS likely involves a customized quote given its extensive features and global deployment, while ZHARA’s no-trial, no-implementation fee policy suggests a potentially flexible or bespoke pricing model.
Given the absence of transparent pricing, your hotel should request direct quotations to compare total costs and value.
Hotels that will benefit from Infor HMS’s comprehensive suite include:
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only requires basic booking tools.
ZHARA might be suitable for:
Not ideal if your hotel requires a full PMS or robust operational management.
Infor HMS provides a trusted, full-featured PMS with solid recent reviews, extensive integrations, and a broad hotel segment appeal. Its core strength lies in operational management, support, and customization, making it suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, all-in-one solution.
ZHARA focuses strictly on revenue management—a valuable niche—but its lack of reviews and integrations make it risky as a standalone platform. Its benefits are best realized if paired with an existing PMS or if your hotel’s primary goal is pricing analytics.
Choose Infor HMS if you need a proven, comprehensive management system that supports your daily operations and growth. Consider ZHARA only if revenue optimization is your top priority and you already have a stable operational platform, but proceed cautiously given the limited user feedback to date.
Note: This comparison emphasizes the proven, review-backed strengths of Infor HMS, which holds the majority of recent positive feedback and a significant market presence. ZHARA’s niche focus and current lack of reviews make it less suitable as a standalone hotel management solution at this time.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and ZHARA share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
ZHARA |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar view | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and ZHARA share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while ZHARA offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. ZHARA: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and ZHARA has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor