The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ingenico shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Ingenico users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between Ingenico and Zil Money for your hotel’s payment processing needs hinges on your priorities. Ingenico, with its longstanding presence and global reach, aims to provide a comprehensive payment infrastructure, but it has no recent reviews or user feedback. Zil Money, on the other hand, boasts a strong recent review base, with 54 reviews in the last six months and an 87% likelihood to recommend, making it a more reliable choice for hoteliers today.
Both products aim to streamline payments, yet they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Are you seeking a proven, globally recognized platform or a newer, more actively reviewed solution? Let’s compare both to help you decide.
Ingenico’s platform, founded in 1974 and with over 3,700 employees, is a giant in the payment processing industry, offering a broad suite of security standards and integration capabilities. Yet, it lacks recent user reviews or detailed feedback, casting doubt on its current usability and support quality.
Zil Money, founded in 2018, is a smaller but highly reviewed platform with 54 recent reviews, all within the last six months. Its ease of use and customer support ratings—both at 4.5/5—are backed by newer feedback, and its 87% likelihood to recommend indicates strong user satisfaction.
While Ingenico remains largely untested in recent user experience, Zil Money’s current review data suggests it is a more dependable choice. Does your hotel need a legacy platform or one with recent, active user validation?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-use payment system with a high probability of user satisfaction, Zil Money is the clear choice. Its 4.5/5 ease of use and customer support ratings, coupled with a recent review count, make it suitable for hotels seeking quick deployment and reliable service.
If your hotel requires broad integration with existing systems and global reach, Ingenico might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or active user feedback, its suitability today is uncertain. For most hotels, Zil Money’s current ratings and features make it the more practical option.
In summary, choose Zil Money if you prioritize recent reviews, ease of use, and customer support. Opt for Ingenico only if you need a legacy platform with extensive international infrastructure and are prepared to navigate unverified recent performance.
Zil Money’s user interface scores 4.5 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its simplicity and straightforward process that reduces onboarding time. Customers praise its intuitive design, which streamlines invoicing, payments, and account management, making staff adoption quick.
Ingenico, by contrast, has a review score of 0/5 for ease of use, and there are no recent reviews to gauge current usability or onboarding experience. Given the available data, your team is likely to find Zil Money significantly easier to implement and daily operate.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 features, including Pay by Link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and payment splitting—features critical for modern hotel operations. It also supports virtual cards, international payments, and offers customizable check printing.
Ingenico provides no listed features or integrations, making it impossible to compare feature sets directly. Its lack of recent reviews or detailed feature documentation suggests it may not be as competitive in today’s hotel payment landscape.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s 4.5/5 customer support rating reflects recent positive feedback, with users appreciating timely and helpful responses. The platform’s onboarding process is similarly rated at 4.16/5, indicating a smoother setup experience.
Ingenico scores 0/5 on support, with no recent reviews to validate support quality or responsiveness. Given the current review data, Zil Money clearly offers more reliable and accessible customer assistance.
Edge: Zil Money.
Ingenico integrates with one verified partner, myCloud Hospitality PMS, offering tailored hotel payment solutions. Zil Money, however, currently supports no verified integrations but boasts a comprehensive API for custom connections, along with multiple banking partnerships.
While Ingenico’s integration count is limited, Zil Money’s flexibility through API access can compensate, provided your hotel has technical resources to implement custom integrations. Still, in terms of verified, ready-to-use integrations, Ingenico is ahead.
Edge: Ingenico.
Zil Money’s recent reviews show an 87% likelihood to recommend, with ratings favoring ease of use, support, and overall satisfaction. Its users include a variety of hotel types, from luxury to budget, with positive comments emphasizing reliability and simplicity.
Ingenico has no recent ratings or reviews, so there’s no current user sentiment to evaluate. Its historical reputation is less relevant without recent data, making Zil Money the clear favorite among active users.
Edge: Zil Money.
Ingenico's pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a freemium or trial option. Being a large enterprise platform, its costs tend to be customized, often higher, and less transparent.
Zil Money charges a flat base price of $400, with no mention of hidden fees, and offers a 15-day free trial. Its transparent pricing and trial availability make it easier for your hotel to evaluate value before commitment.
In brief, Zil Money provides clearer, more accessible pricing information.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their market validation: Zil Money’s recent reviews and high recommendation rate contrast sharply with Ingenico’s lack of recent feedback. Zil Money’s current user satisfaction, ease of use, and feature set make it the clear choice for modern hotels.
Choose Zil Money if you want a platform with active support, proven usability, and a comprehensive feature set suitable for diverse property types. It’s especially ideal if your hotel values transparency, quick onboarding, and recent positive user experiences.
Opt for Ingenico only if your hotel operates at a large scale, requires global multi-currency handling, and already benefits from its existing integrations and security infrastructure. Otherwise, Zil Money’s current review-backed strengths make it the safer, more responsive choice.
According to HTR's product database, Ingenico and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ingenico and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Ingenico offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ingenico: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ingenico has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor