The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Ingenico shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Ingenico users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software for your hotel is crucial. Both Ingenico and ROH aim to simplify transactions, but they differ significantly in features, reviews, and market presence. Ingenico, despite its long history, has no recent reviews or ratings, whereas ROH, with 65 reviews in the last six months and a near-perfect score, demonstrates clearer value and performance. Which product best aligns with your hotel’s needs?
Ingenico, established in 1974, offers a general payment processing platform designed for multiple industries but lacks recent user feedback, making it difficult to assess its current effectiveness. In contrast, ROH, founded in 2023, specializes exclusively in hospitality payments, with a community of active users providing recent insights.
ROH’s reviewers praise its ease of use, with a 4.95/5 rating, and support scores nearly perfect at 4.97/5. Ingenico, with a 0/5 overall rating and no reviews, cannot demonstrate recent user satisfaction or functionality. Given the volume and recency of reviews, ROH's reputation appears more trustworthy today.
While Ingenico claims to offer comprehensive payment solutions, its lack of recent user feedback leaves its effectiveness unverified. ROH’s recent reviews highlight simplified invoicing, real-time reporting, and automation, directly addressing hotel operational needs.
Are you comfortable with a product that’s untested recently, or do you prefer a solution with current validated success? The answer heavily favors ROH.
If your hotel needs a payment platform tailored to hospitality with active user feedback, go with ROH. Its features, recent reviews, and dedicated focus on hotel payments make it a safer, more reliable choice. For hotels that value ease of use, automation, and customer support, ROH is proven to excel.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a broad, industry-agnostic payment system capable of handling multiple verticals without specialized hospitality features, Ingenico might seem suitable—though its lack of recent reviews makes this a risky assumption. If you prioritize proven, current user satisfaction, ROH clearly outperforms Ingenico.
For hoteliers seeking a solution with advanced payment functionalities like refunds, split payments, and compliance, ROH’s 19 exclusive features provide a substantial advantage. Ingenico, offering no unique features or recent evidence of performance, appears less aligned with current hospitality payment needs.
In summary, for a hotel that values recent proven performance and industry-specific features, ROH is the recommended choice.
ROH’s user interface boasts a 4.95/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews, with users describing it as “extremely user friendly” and “making my job so much easier.” On the other hand, Ingenico’s ease of use is rated 0/5, and there are no recent reviews to support its usability claims.
ROH’s onboarding process is rated 4.92/5, with users noting the straightforward setup and minimal learning curve. Ingenico’s lack of recent reviews makes it impossible to assess onboarding or staff adoption.
Edge: ROH.
ROH offers 19 features tailored specifically for hospitality payments, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, pay-by-link, recurring payments, and acceptance of Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, Amex, and others. Ingenico, with no unique features listed, does not demonstrate any specific capabilities beyond basic payment processing.
The richness of ROH’s feature set directly addresses common hotel payment needs, such as chargeback management, tokenization, and multi-processor gateways. Ingenico’s absence of features and no recent reviews make it an unappealing option for modern hotels.
Edge: ROH.
ROH’s customer support is rated 4.97/5, with users describing it as “great” and “support staff is excellent,” along with a smooth onboarding experience. Ingenico, with a 0/5 support rating and no recent feedback, offers no verifiable support quality.
ROH’s recent reviews confirm ongoing support excellence, critical for hotels integrating new payment systems. Ingenico’s support quality remains unconfirmed, leaving potential implementation risks.
Edge: ROH.
Both products are listed with only one verified integration: Ingenico with myCloud Hospitality PMS, and ROH with Oracle Hospitality. No shared integrations exist, and neither platform supports extensive third-party connections.
Given the limited integrations, neither product has a substantial edge here. However, ROH’s focus on hospitality suggests future expansion or deeper integrations may be more aligned with hotel needs.
Edge: Neither, but ROH’s industry focus gives it a slight advantage.
ROH’s recent reviews have a perfect score of 9.91/10, with positive comments emphasizing ease of use and support. With 65 reviews, recent feedback provides a clear picture of user satisfaction.
Ingenico has no reviews or ratings and thus cannot be rated by hoteliers. Its lack of recent feedback disqualifies it from consideration based on user experience.
Edge: ROH.
Ingenico’s pricing structure is not publicly available, and it does not offer a free trial or transparent fees. ROH costs $100 monthly, with no mention of implementation fees or other charges.
Given the transparency and straightforward pricing of ROH, it offers better value clarity. Ingenico’s pricing remains unspecified, making budget comparison impossible.
Since Ingenico’s recent user feedback is unavailable, it’s better suited for hotels that are comfortable with unverified performance or have legacy systems in place.
ROH’s current market presence and recent reviews make it suitable for hotels wanting a modern, reliable, and feature-rich payment system.
ROH addresses a specific niche—the hospitality industry—with a focus on automation, user experience, and recent positive reviews. Its 19 unique features and high support ratings make it a dependable choice for hotels aiming to modernize their payment operations.
Ingenico, despite its long history, offers no recent validation of its performance or features, making it a questionable option for hotels seeking assurance and current user satisfaction. Its lack of reviews and transparency suggest it’s not the best fit for modern hotels.
If your priority is a proven, hospitality-focused platform that enhances operational efficiency and guest experience, ROH is the clear choice. Choose Ingenico only if you have specific legacy needs and are comfortable with unverified current performance.
According to HTR's product database, Ingenico and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Ingenico and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Ingenico offers 1 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Ingenico: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Ingenico has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property