The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 244 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
innRoad shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Mastercamping shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 244 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 244 | 0 |
After analyzing 244 verified reviews, innRoad users most value its customer support quality, customization and flexibility, reservation dashboard and reports, while Mastercamping users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Dashboard and Reports
▾
|
|
|
+
Tape Chart and Color-Coding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Rate and Payment Management
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility and App Functionality
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 150 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #13 41 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #15 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #16 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 86 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 37 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #12 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 229 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #29 6 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #26 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #25 0 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine is critical for your hotel’s success in today’s competitive landscape. InnRoad’s Booking Engine and Mastercamping (MasterASP) both aim to streamline reservations and boost direct bookings, but they serve very different markets and come with distinct strengths. Your decision hinges on your property type, regional presence, and the specific features your team needs to operate efficiently.
InnRoad’s Booking Engine is a well-established platform with a proven track record, supported by more reviews, recent customer feedback, and higher ratings. Mastercamping, on the other hand, caters specifically to campsites and holiday parks, but lacks the broad adoption and review activity that make InnRoad a safer choice for most hotels. Do you want a trusted, feature-rich system with a global footprint? Or are you a niche operator in the camping sector?
InnRoad’s Booking Engine is the clear leader, boasting over 200 recent reviews, a 4.68/5 overall rating, and a strong presence across multiple regions. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools suited for various hotel types, from inns to resorts, and offers extensive integrations and support.
Mastercamping, despite its niche focus, has no reviews or active ratings, making it difficult to assess its reliability, usability, or customer satisfaction. For most hoteliers evaluating a booking engine today, InnRoad offers a safer, more proven choice.
InnRoad’s Booking Engine and Mastercamping both aim to increase bookings and streamline operations, but their core markets and feature sets diverge sharply. InnRoad is a broad-spectrum property management system trusted by thousands worldwide, with a focus on increasing direct reservations and operational efficiency. Its robust integration options and extensive features cater to a diverse range of hotel segments, from boutique inns to resorts.
Mastercamping, by contrast, is tailored explicitly for campsites and holiday parks, emphasizing features suited for outdoor accommodations. It offers integrated booking, billing, and guest management in a simplified interface, but lacks the widespread adoption and recent customer feedback that bolster InnRoad’s credibility. Given the absence of reviews for Mastercamping, it’s hard to gauge how well it performs in real-world hotel settings.
Are you seeking a solution proven by extensive user feedback and global presence? Or do you prefer a niche product built for camping operations? The choice depends on your property type and regional needs.
If your hotel requires an established, feature-rich booking engine with proven enhancements in direct bookings and revenue, go with InnRoad. Its 200+ reviews, high ratings, and recent feedback support its reliability and ease of use for properties ranging from small inns to large resorts.
If your property is a campsite or holiday park, and you need a system tailored specifically for outdoor accommodations, Mastercamping might seem attractive. However, its lack of reviews, ratings, and market presence make it a risky choice for most hoteliers.
For hotels seeking a scalable, supported system with extensive integrations (like channel managers, payment providers, and marketing tools), InnRoad clearly leads. Conversely, if your focus is solely on outdoor accommodations with minimal need for integrations, Mastercamping could be considered—though the absence of user feedback is a concern.
InnRoad scores 4.44/5 for ease of use, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward booking process. Its onboarding process averages 4.2/5, and reviews highlight a system that hotel staff can learn quickly, with minimal training.
Mastercamping’s interface and usability are not rated or reviewed, making it impossible to compare on this front. However, given its targeted, simplified design for campsites and parks, it may be easier for staff to learn in a niche setting. Still, without user feedback or ratings, this remains speculative.
Edge: InnRoad.
InnRoad offers 54 unique features, including multi-currency and multi-lingual support, channel management, property management, gift vouchers, online support, custom rates, payment processing, and guest communication tools. These features cater to a broad range of operational needs for hotels.
Mastercamping provides core booking, billing, and guest management functionalities tailored for outdoor accommodations. Its feature set appears streamlined but lacks the extensive capabilities and integrations present in InnRoad.
Given the breadth and depth of InnRoad’s features, especially with its native integrations and automation options, it sets a higher bar.
Edge: InnRoad.
InnRoad boasts a 4.44/5 customer support rating, with reviews praising its responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Customers appreciate the 24/7 live support and the proactive onboarding process, which helps in resolving issues promptly.
Mastercamping has no available reviews or ratings for customer support, making it difficult to assess its responsiveness or quality. Its support reputation remains unknown, which is a significant factor when choosing a mission-critical system.
Edge: InnRoad.
InnRoad connects with 34 verified partners, including major channel managers, payment systems, and property management tools like QuickBooks and Revinate. These integrations enhance operational workflows and guest experiences.
Mastercamping has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external systems, which could hinder scalability and automation.
For hotels that rely on extensive third-party integrations, InnRoad presents a clear advantage.
Edge: InnRoad.
InnRoad’s user reviews, with a total of 200, and recent feedback in the last 6 months, give it a solid 4.68/5 overall rating. Hoteliers praise its usability, support, and the impact it has on increasing direct bookings, with an 88% likelihood to recommend.
Mastercamping has no reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Its market presence and customer feedback are minimal, reducing confidence in its performance.
Given the data, InnRoad is the preferred choice.
Edge: InnRoad.
Pricing details for both products are unavailable. InnRoad does not mention a free trial or detailed pricing, implying it may operate on a custom quote basis, typical for enterprise SaaS solutions. Mastercamping’s pricing is also undisclosed, with no trial or plans listed.
Without transparent pricing, assessing value becomes difficult. However, the proven features, support, and reviews of InnRoad strongly suggest it offers a valuable investment.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
InnRoad’s Booking Engine is a comprehensive, well-supported platform trusted by thousands of hoteliers worldwide. Its broad feature set, integrations, and recent positive reviews make it the top choice for most properties looking to increase direct bookings and improve operational efficiency.
Mastercamping, despite its appeal for outdoor operators, lacks the user feedback and market presence to confidently recommend for traditional hotels. Its focus on campsites means it may be suitable only for outdoor-specific accommodations.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich booking engine with extensive support and integrations, InnRoad clearly outperforms. For outdoor properties in niche markets, Mastercamping might be worth exploring, but caution is advised due to the lack of reviews and market validation.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Mastercamping |
|---|
According to HTR's product database, innRoad Booking Engine and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Mastercamping |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 42 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Customer support is generally praised for being responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance to resolve issues. However, there are some m... Customer support is generally praised for being responsive and knowledgeable, providing timely assistance to resolve issues. However, there are some mentions of slow response times and communication barriers with support staff who are not fluent in English, which can be frustrating for users.
Users frequently mention the high degree of customization and flexibility offered by InnRoad, particularly in terms of room appearance, billing functi... Users frequently mention the high degree of customization and flexibility offered by InnRoad, particularly in terms of room appearance, billing functions, and reporting. This enables hotels to tailor the software to their specific needs, improving operational efficiency and guest satisfaction.
The reservation dashboard and comprehensive reporting features are highlighted for their ability to provide actionable insights and streamline data ma... The reservation dashboard and comprehensive reporting features are highlighted for their ability to provide actionable insights and streamline data management. These tools help hotel managers keep track of occupancy, revenue, and other key performance indicators, making it easier to make informed decisions and improve overall hotel performance.
Where hoteliers push back
The system's ability to manage rates and payments, including rate changes and split payments, is highlighted by users. However, some find these featur... The system's ability to manage rates and payments, including rate changes and split payments, is highlighted by users. However, some find these features complex and time-consuming, suggesting a need for more streamlined processes to enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Several users report experiencing glitches and slow loading times with the user interface, which can be disruptive to daily operations. Issues such as... Several users report experiencing glitches and slow loading times with the user interface, which can be disruptive to daily operations. Issues such as the system freezing and functionality errors are noted, indicating a need for enhanced stability and speed.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. innRoad Booking Engine and Mastercamping (MasterASP) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. innRoad Booking Engine offers 34 verified integration partners, while Mastercamping (MasterASP) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. innRoad Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
innRoad Booking Engine: No. Mastercamping (MasterASP): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. innRoad has an HT Score of 34 and Mastercamping has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor