The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like Guest Messaging.
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Jaras users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is essential for your hotel’s operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Both Jaras by Jaras and protel PMS by Planet aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different hotel profiles and have distinct strengths. Your decision hinges on your property’s size, complexity, and specific needs—are you seeking a modern, automated platform or a highly integrated system with extensive third-party connections?
While Jaras is a new player with zero reviews, it promises a comprehensive, automation-oriented experience for a broad spectrum of accommodation providers. Conversely, protel PMS, with over 105 recent reviews, offers a proven track record in hospitality, especially in larger or multi-property environments. Which of these systems aligns better with your operational scale and technological expectations?
Jaras positions itself as a modern, cloud-native platform designed to unify reservation, financial, and operational workflows through automation. It aims to serve a variety of property types, including resorts, apartments, and smaller hotels, with a focus on simplicity and efficiency. Protels, meanwhile, has been established since 1985 and boasts a large ecosystem of integrations and a flexible suite that caters to diverse hotel types, from independent to large chains.
Jaras’s absence of reviews makes it difficult to assess real-world performance or support quality, whereas protel’s extensive review base highlights strengths in customization and integration but also underscores issues like slow support and system bugs. Given protel’s proven presence and recent user feedback, do you prefer a well-tested system with a broad feature set or a newer platform promising streamlined, automated operations?
Jaras claims a user-friendly cloud interface designed for modern hospitality managers, but without reviews, this remains unverified. protel’s interface, praised for its intuitive design by multiple users, is noted for being easy to navigate, especially for daily operations, with a user rating of 4.12/5. Support responsiveness is a concern in protel’s reviews, but the platform’s onboarding process and ongoing training are generally rated positively.
Edge: protel PMS. Its longstanding reputation and positive user experience ratings make it a safer choice for ease of use and support, especially for teams managing complex or multi-property portfolios.
Jaras offers a handful of unique features like guest messaging and operational automation, but it only includes 15 shared features with protel. protel’s strength lies in its extensive feature set—over 31 features exclusive to it—covering multi-currency support, booking engine, integrated CRS, guest CRM, mobile notes, and automated space optimization. These capabilities cater to hotels needing advanced automation, detailed revenue management, and extensive integrations.
Edge: protel PMS. Its larger suite of features and proven integration ecosystem make it the more comprehensive choice for hotels seeking scalability and advanced operational tools.
While Jaras has no reviews, protel’s support ratings are modest at 3.95/5, with some users citing slow response times and support delays. However, recent reviews praise protel’s helpfulness and responsiveness, especially for onboarding and training, despite ongoing issues with bugs and system updates.
Edge: protel PMS. Its extensive user base and recent reviews suggest a more reliable support experience, though improvements are needed.
Jaras claims over 150 online booking channels for distribution, but it has no verified third-party integrations outside this scope. protel’s ecosystem is significantly larger, with over 1,200 verified integrations, including major PMS, CRM, revenue management, and channel management systems. Shared integrations are nonexistent, but protel’s extensive ecosystem offers unmatched flexibility and connectivity.
Edge: protel PMS. Its vast integration network supports complex, multi-system operations, essential for larger or tech-forward hotels.
Jaras, being new, has no reviews and thus no user ratings. protel’s recent reviews are predominantly positive, with an overall rating of 4.11/5 and an 80% likelihood to recommend. Independent and boutique hotels, as well as larger properties, have rated protel highly for its versatility, though some criticize support delays.
Edge: protel PMS. Its proven reputation and recent user feedback give it a clear advantage in hotel satisfaction ratings.
Jaras’s pricing details are unavailable, but its base price is listed at $1,000, with no mention of a trial or subscription model. protel’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no additional implementation fees, making it more affordable upfront but potentially more expensive long-term depending on property size.
Jaras presents itself as a promising, modern PMS with a focus on automation, but with no reviews, its reliability remains unverified. Protels, with over 105 recent reviews and a strong market presence, offers a well-rounded, flexible system trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide.
If your hotel favors proven stability, extensive integrations, and a large support network, protel PMS is the clear choice. For tech-savvy, smaller operators looking for automation and simplicity, Jaras could be worth exploring once it gains proven user feedback.
In sum, if you need a reliable, scalable PMS with a vast feature set and established support, go with protel PMS. If your focus is on a new, innovative platform promising automation and streamlined workflows, monitor Jaras’s development before making your decision.
According to HTR's product database, Jaras and protel PMS (by Planet) share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 20 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Jaras and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Jaras offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Jaras: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Jaras has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor