The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 105 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Revenue management module.
Sirvoy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 105 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 105 |
After analyzing 105 verified reviews, Jaras users most value its , while Sirvoy users highlight customer support, ease of use, reservation management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
User Interface and Design
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Functionality Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Adaptability
▾
|
|
|
−
Cost and Value for Money
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #22 36 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #48 3 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #27 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #29 21 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #37 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #42 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #35 3 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #23 16 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #16 31 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #13 6 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Sirvoy hinges on your property’s specific needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but their core capabilities and target audiences differ markedly. Jaras offers a comprehensive, enterprise-level platform with automation and extensive integrations, while Sirvoy focuses on simplicity and ease of use for smaller properties. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current scale and future plans?
Jaras is a newly launched, cloud-native property management system with a broad feature set, but it lacks customer reviews and a proven track record. Sirvoy, meanwhile, has amassed 95 reviews in recent months, with a high 94% likelihood to recommend and a strong customer satisfaction score. Is adopting a system with more proven support and user feedback the safer choice?
Jaras aims to serve mid-sized to large properties needing a unified automation platform that handles reservations, financial workflows, and channel distribution from a single dashboard. It integrates with over 150 online channels and offers features like revenue management, digital registration, and operational automation, making it suitable for hotels with complex operational needs. However, its lack of reviews raises questions about its maturity and real-world performance.
Sirvoy, on the other hand, is designed for small to medium-sized hotels, B&Bs, and hostels seeking an intuitive, lightweight management system. Its core features include a booking engine, channel management, and payment processing, all wrapped in an easy-to-navigate interface. With 95 reviews and a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating, Sirvoy’s proven track record makes it a safer bet for hoteliers prioritizing reliability and straightforward workflows.
If your hotel needs automation, extensive integrations, and scalable features, Jaras might be the preferred choice. But if user-friendliness, customer support, and tangible user feedback matter most, Sirvoy is the more trustworthy option. Do you prioritize growth and automation or proven simplicity and support?
If your hotel is a growing property or portfolio requiring advanced automation, channel connectivity, and detailed operational insights, go with Jaras. Its financial management tools, revenue modules, and 150+ OTA integrations support scaling and complex workflows.
If your hotel values ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a strong support reputation, Sirvoy is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for small-to-midsize properties that want reliable reservation management, a user-friendly interface, and excellent customer support without the complexity of larger systems.
Hotels planning to expand or add automation features should lean toward Jaras for its scalability. Conversely, hotels seeking quick deployment, minimal training, and trusted support should pick Sirvoy.
Sirvoy boasts a 4.64/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews from 95 users, who describe it as intuitive and simple to navigate. Support is highly rated at 4.85/5, with users praising its quick responses, helpfulness, and straightforward onboarding process. Many reviewers mention that staff adoption was seamless and that the system’s design reduces training time.
Jaras, however, currently has no user ratings or reviews, making its ease of use and onboarding process uncertain. Its complex feature set suggests a steep learning curve, potentially requiring more extensive training and support.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras offers 16 features, including unique capabilities like on-premise deployment, digital registration, and a revenue management module. These features cater to properties needing more advanced control over operations and automation, especially with a focus on financial workflows and unit management.
Sirvoy provides 30 features, including multi-currency handling, transactional emails, guest communication (SMS), integrated payment processing, a booking engine, and a website builder. It also offers features like group bookings, task management, and real-time reporting, which are absent in Jaras.
Given the broader feature set and proven implementations, Sirvoy edges ahead for properties wanting a well-rounded, versatile system. However, if your hotel needs specialized features like revenue management or digital registration, Jaras’s unique tools may be more relevant.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Sirvoy’s support is highly praised, with a 4.85/5 rating and a 9.41/10 NPS score from recent reviews. Users describe the support team as responsive, helpful, and quick to assist with onboarding and troubleshooting, often noting that support staff go “above and beyond” to help new users get started smoothly.
Jaras currently has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to gauge its customer service quality. The lack of feedback raises concerns about how well the company’s support infrastructure can assist during implementation or issues.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras does not currently have any verified integrations, which limits its connectivity to other systems and channels. This could pose challenges if your hotel relies on specific third-party tools or distribution channels.
Sirvoy offers 21 verified integrations, including major booking channels like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS systems. It also connects with revenue management, marketing, and payment providers such as TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate, providing a more comprehensive ecosystem.
For hotels that depend on multi-channel distribution and third-party integrations, Sirvoy clearly leads. Jaras’s lack of integrations suggests it may not yet support scalable or integrated workflows.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Since Jaras has no reviews, there’s no data on hotel ratings or segment-specific feedback. Conversely, Sirvoy’s recent reviews showcase a high satisfaction score, with a 94% likelihood to recommend across various property types, including B&Bs, hostels, resorts, and boutique hotels.
Reviewers of Sirvoy praise its ease of use, customer support, and value for money, with many mentioning that the system has improved their daily operations. The high review count and recent positive feedback make Sirvoy the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Jaras’s pricing is listed at a $1,000 base price, with no monthly fees, freemium options, or trial periods noted. Its high upfront cost suggests it targets larger properties or portfolios willing to invest in a comprehensive system.
Sirvoy’s pricing is significantly lower at $200 per month, with a 30-day trial available. Its flexible subscription model and affordability appeal to small to medium-sized hotels seeking an accessible, cost-effective solution.
Considering the proven value and recent reviews, Sirvoy offers better cost-effectiveness for most hoteliers. Jaras’s higher price point might only be justified if its advanced features significantly impact your operations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, prefers simple systems, or lacks the resources for extensive onboarding and training.
Not ideal if your hotel demands advanced automation, complex revenue management, or extensive integrations.
Jaras presents a fresh, comprehensive platform designed for scalable property management, but it currently lacks reviews and proven real-world performance. If your hotel can invest in a new system and values automation and extensive integrations, Jaras could be worth considering once it establishes a track record.
Sirvoy, with over 95 recent reviews and a 94% recommendation rate, stands out as the more reliable and user-approved solution. It excels in ease of use, customer support, and affordability, making it a safe choice for small to mid-sized hotels seeking efficiency and support.
Ultimately, if you need a proven, highly-rated system with extensive features and support, Sirvoy is the clear pick. For properties ready to pioneer a new platform and requiring advanced automation, Jaras might be worth exploring further once it matures.
According to HTR's product database, Jaras and Sirvoy share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suite... Users highlight the system's efficiency in managing reservations and guest profiles. However, certain functionalities such as linking rooms into suites or offering package deals are noted as areas that require enhancement.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved fin... Some users express dissatisfaction with Sirvoy's reporting limitations, specifically the absence of a daily sales report and the need for improved financial and invoicing features. There's also feedback on the lack of advanced CRM options and difficulties in integrating upselling features.
Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wis... Sirvoy allows for some degree of customization which users find helpful in tailoring the system to their specific property needs. Yet, a few users wish for more flexibility in invoice customization and dynamic billing options.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Jaras and Sirvoy share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Jaras offers 0 verified integration partners, while Sirvoy offers 21. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Sirvoy leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Jaras: No. Sirvoy: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Jaras has an HT Score of 0 and Sirvoy has 85. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor