The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Keezapp shines , with exclusive features like PCI Compliant and Easy Room Selection.
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Keezapp users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 2 reviews |
Your hotel needs a contactless check-in solution that simplifies arrivals, reduces costs, and enhances guest satisfaction. Both Keezapp and MyStay aim to address these goals, but they differ significantly in scope, features, and market presence. Keezapp offers a comprehensive guest self-service platform with automation and in-room check-in options, while MyStay focuses on streamlining check-in/out with automation, communication, and upselling. Which solution aligns better with your operational needs?
Both Keezapp and MyStay deliver contactless check-in experiences, but Keezapp emphasizes automation through kiosks, mobile keys, and ID verification, making it suitable for hotels aiming for full guest self-service. MyStay, on the other hand, concentrates on digital registration, online communication, and bill management, ideal for properties prioritizing ease of check-in and upselling. Keezapp’s strength lies in automating in-person processes, while MyStay excels in pre-arrival digital engagement. Which approach suits your property’s operational model?
The key difference is the user base: Keezapp’s reviews are limited and less recent, with no publicly available ratings, indicating a niche or early-stage product. Conversely, MyStay boasts over 40 recent reviews, a 5/5 overall rating, and a 98% likelihood to recommend, demonstrating stronger market validation. Do you prefer a solution with proven customer satisfaction or one still establishing its reputation?
If your hotel needs a full-suite self-service platform that includes mobile keys, kiosk check-in, ID verification, and automation, Keezapp might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or rating data, its real-world effectiveness remains uncertain. If your priority is a contactless check-in system that enhances guest communication, simplifies operations, and has proven satisfaction, MyStay is the clear choice, as evidenced by its high review count and recent positive feedback.
Your decision should depend on whether you value a more comprehensive automation (Keezapp) or a highly-rated, contactless solution with strong guest communication and upselling features (MyStay). For most hotels seeking reliable, modern check-in technology, MyStay’s proven track record outweighs Keezapp’s limited data.
MyStay scores an impressive 4.91/5 for ease of use and 4.93/5 for support, with users praising its simple setup and intuitive interface. Keezapp, in comparison, has no available ratings but receives repeated comments about its straightforward concept, though actual usability data is lacking. The high ratings and recent reviews for MyStay indicate its staff and users find it easy to implement and operate.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 9 exclusive features, including guest segmentation, room upgrade merchandising, multi-channel communication, offer templates, A/B testing, and digital payments—features Keezapp does not have. Keezapp’s unique features include PCI compliance, easy room selection, and ID verification, but these are fewer in scope.
With more features tailored for upselling, marketing, and automated communications, MyStay provides a broader toolkit for improving revenue and guest engagement. Keezapp’s features are more centered on core check-in automation.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support and onboarding ratings are nearly perfect at 4.93/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness. Keezapp has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to assess its support quality. Given the importance of reliable support during implementation and troubleshooting, MyStay’s high support scores give it a significant advantage.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay boasts 30 verified integrations, including popular PMS and channel managers like Cloudbeds, KWENTRA, and others, covering a broad spectrum of hotel systems. Keezapp’s four verified partners are limited, with only two shared ones (Mews and Access Hospitality). Its integrations are fewer and less diverse, potentially limiting flexibility.
For hotels with existing tech stacks or seeking extensive connectivity, MyStay’s integrations provide a more seamless experience.
Edge: MyStay.
With 40 recent reviews, MyStay enjoys a 5/5 overall rating and a 98% likelihood to recommend, indicating high satisfaction across hotel types, especially serviced apartments and boutique hotels. Keezapp has no recent reviews or rating data, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment.
Given the recent, positive feedback, MyStay’s reputation among hoteliers is clearly stronger.
Edge: MyStay.
Keezapp’s pricing information is unavailable, possibly indicating a custom or early-stage pricing model. MyStay charges a flat $400 monthly fee, with no trial or implementation fees, providing clarity on costs.
If budget transparency is crucial, MyStay’s straightforward pricing allows for better financial planning.
Not ideal if you rely heavily on staff-driven service, or if you prefer a highly-rated, proven platform with extensive reviews.
Not ideal if your hotel requires in-room automation like mobile keys or ID verification, or if you prefer a more niche, less proven solution.
Keezapp provides a broad guest self-service platform with features like mobile keys, kiosks, and ID verification. Its fewer reviews and lack of recent data make its effectiveness uncertain, limiting confidence in its current market standing.
MyStay, with over 40 recent reviews and a 5/5 rating, demonstrates strong adoption and satisfaction. It excels in guest communication, automation, and integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking a reliable, contactless system with proven results.
If you want a well-supported, feature-rich solution with high customer approval, go with MyStay. Choose Keezapp only if your hotel requires a full suite of automation tools and is prepared to verify its ongoing development and support quality.
According to HTR's product database, Keezapp and MyStay Check in share 5 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Easy Room Selection | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| ID Verification | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| Offer Templates Library | ||
| PCI Compliant | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Keezapp and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Keezapp offers 4 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Keezapp: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Keezapp has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor