The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Lukoton shines .
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, Lukoton users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Lukoton |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Lukoton |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Lukoton |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Lukoton |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 2 reviews |
Choosing between Lukoton’s locking system and MyStay Check-in hinges on your hotel’s specific contactless check-in needs. While both aim to minimize physical contact and streamline guest access, they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Lukoton’s offering lacks reviews and recent data, suggesting limited real-world validation, whereas MyStay’s extensive review base and ongoing updates make it a more dependable choice.
Ultimately, your decision should reflect whether you prioritize a proven, feature-rich platform with high guest satisfaction or a simpler, yet less validated, locking solution. Are you ready to dive into the detailed comparison?
Lukoton’s system focuses solely on physical locking, providing a hardware-based access solution that aims to replace traditional keys with digital locks. It addresses guest access control but does not include automated check-in or guest communication features.
MyStay, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive contactless check-in process—allowing guests to complete registration, sign documents, and pay digitally before arrival. It also provides a QR code or kiosk-based on-site check-in, reducing front desk contact and queues.
But with Lukoton’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star rating, its real-world effectiveness remains unverified. Conversely, MyStay boasts a 5/5 overall rating based on 40 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and guest satisfaction.
Do you want a hardware-centric access solution or an integrated contactless check-in platform? The choice depends on whether you prioritize physical access control or a full digital guest journey.
If your hotel needs a dedicated access control hardware system primarily for keyless entry, Lukoton might seem suitable. However, given its absence of reviews, recent data, or validation from hotelier feedback, it’s difficult to gauge its reliability or ease of implementation.
Opt for MyStay if your hotel seeks a validated, user-rated contactless check-in solution with proven benefits. Its 40 reviews, a 5/5 overall rating, and recent positive feedback highlight its ease of use, support, and extensive feature set, making it ideal for properties aiming to modernize guest arrivals and improve operational efficiency.
In summary, for hotels prioritizing a contactless guest experience with ongoing support and proven track record, MyStay is the clear choice. Lukoton’s hardware-only approach is less compelling without current user validation.
Lukoton offers a hardware-based locking system, which generally involves installation and physical management—an experience that is difficult to rate since no user reviews are available. Its ease of use remains unverified, making its setup and daily operation uncertain.
MyStay, however, has a 4.91/5 rating based on 40 reviews, with hoteliers praising its simple interface, quick onboarding, and intuitive features. Many reviews mention how easy it is to set up and start using, even for properties without extensive technical staff.
Edge: MyStay.
Lukoton’s features are limited to its physical locking hardware, with no additional software features or integrations noted. Its focus is solely on providing keyless entry, lacking automation, guest communication, or payment tools.
MyStay offers 14 unique features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, digital payments, self-service check-in, and door lock integration. These features support a holistic, contactless guest journey, making it significantly more versatile.
Edge: MyStay.
Lukoton’s support ratings are unavailable, and its review count is zero, indicating no recent user feedback on support quality or onboarding. Its lack of reviews suggests limited ongoing engagement or validation.
MyStay, with a 4.93/5 support rating from 40 reviews, receives high praise for responsiveness and helpfulness. Hoteliers frequently mention prompt technical support and smooth onboarding, reinforcing confidence in their customer service.
Edge: MyStay.
Lukoton has no verified integrations or partnerships listed, suggesting it operates as a standalone hardware solution without software connectivity.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including property management systems, channel managers, and keyless entry solutions like Door Lock. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to connect their systems seamlessly.
Edge: MyStay.
Lukoton’s reviews are nonexistent, providing no basis for hotelier ratings or property segment feedback.
MyStay’s average review score of 5/5 from 40 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and robust features, indicates strong satisfaction across various segments. Hoteliers from boutique hotels, serviced apartments, and city center properties show particular appreciation.
Edge: MyStay.
Lukoton’s pricing is unavailable, with no mention of fees or subscription models, making cost comparison impossible.
MyStay charges a base fee of $400, with no mention of ongoing subscription fees, trial periods, or additional costs. The clear pricing model makes it easier for hotels to evaluate ROI.
Lukoton offers a hardware lock system designed purely for physical access, with no recent reviews or proven hotelier validation. Its focus on hardware makes it less adaptable for hotels seeking a comprehensive digital guest journey.
MyStay provides a validated, feature-rich platform that covers the entire contactless guest experience—from digital check-in and payments to automated communication and integrations. Its strong recent review base and high satisfaction ratings make it the better choice for most hotels aiming to modernize.
Choose Lukoton if you need a dedicated, hardware-based access control system, especially in environments where physical security is paramount. Opt for MyStay if your priority is a proven, scalable, and full-featured contactless check-in platform that enhances guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
According to HTR's product database, Locking system and MyStay Check in share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Lukoton |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Locking system and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Locking system offers 0 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Locking system: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Lukoton has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor