The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH shines , with exclusive features like On premise.
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #75 0 reviews | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #79 0 reviews | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #69 0 reviews | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #53 0 reviews | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #56 0 reviews | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's success, especially when balancing ease of use, features, support, and cost. Lodgit Desk offers a simple, cost-effective solution tailored for smaller properties and multi-property management, but it’s limited in scale and lacks recent reviews or high ratings. In contrast, Mews, with over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, has established itself as a leading cloud-based PMS that caters to a broad spectrum of hotel types globally. Which system aligns more with your hotel’s growth ambitions and operational needs?
Both Lodgit and Mews aim to streamline accommodation management, but they diverge significantly in scope and user feedback. Lodgit provides basic reservation and invoicing tools, primarily suited for small hotels and hostels seeking affordability and simplicity, without the need for extensive integrations or cloud features. Meanwhile, Mews offers a comprehensive, modern, cloud-based platform that covers reservations, billing, guest communications, revenue management, and over 336 integrations—making it more versatile for hotels seeking growth and technological expansion. Do you need a straightforward tool or a full-scale operational platform?
If your hotel requires a highly reliable, scalable system with extensive third-party integrations, Mews is the clear choice. Its current review count of 758 and recent feedback from hotels, including boutique properties and large chains, demonstrate its maturity and broad acceptance. Conversely, Lodgit may suit smaller properties with tight budgets that prioritize basic reservation management over advanced features and integrations. For hotels planning to scale or modernize, Mews’s advanced capabilities and recent, positive reviews make it the more future-proof investment. Which profile better fits your hotel’s trajectory?
Lodgit’s interface mimics traditional reservation books but lacks recent user feedback, leaving its usability somewhat unverified. Mews, however, boasts a 4.7/5 ease of use rating based on nearly 100 recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive, modern interface, and straightforward onboarding process. Support and onboarding ratings also favor Mews, with a 4.27/5 score and comments highlighting a smooth setup and responsive support team. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit’s feature set is limited, focusing on basic reservation management, offers, and invoicing—lacking advanced tools like guest CRM, revenue management, or mobile apps. Mews, with 43 exclusive features, includes multi-lingual and multi-currency support, online check-in, automated night audits, guest messaging, and a marketplace with over 1,000 third-party integrations. It’s clearly more equipped for complex, multi-property, or tech-savvy hotels. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit offers support ratings absent from recent reviews, suggesting limited recent customer feedback. Mews, rated at 4.27/5, has garnered praise for its responsive, 24/7 support and proactive onboarding, with reviews stating, “The support team sets new standards.” Its extensive support infrastructure and positive recent feedback give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit lacks current reviews, making comparison impossible. Mews, with a 4.62/5 rating from 758 recent reviews, is highly rated across hotel segments, from boutique properties to large chains, with a 93% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers consistently praise Mews for its reliability, ease, and scalability. Its recent, substantial review volume confirms its standing as a trusted choice. Edge: Mews.
Lodgit does not publicly list pricing, indicating it might be tailored or modestly priced for small properties. Mews charges a starting fee of $900/month, with no implementation or ongoing fees disclosed, but its high feature density and large integration ecosystem justify its value for hotels seeking growth. Given Mews’s clear pricing and extensive features, it offers transparency and predictable costs for expanding hotels.
Mews and Lodgit cater to different hotel profiles, with Mews emerging as the more comprehensive, well-reviewed choice. Lodgit offers a budget-friendly, straightforward system suitable for small properties with limited needs, but it lacks recent reviews and high ratings, which diminishes confidence. Mews’s extensive feature set, recent review volume, and high satisfaction ratings make it the better option for hotels looking to modernize and scale.
For hotels aiming for operational efficiency, guest experience, and growth, Mews provides the tools, support, and reputation necessary to succeed. If your goal is to implement a reliable, adaptable, and future-ready PMS, Mews is the recommended choice. However, if your property remains small, budget-conscious, and basic management suffices, Lodgit could be a fit—though it’s less proven in today’s competitive landscape.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware and Mews PMS share 16 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 32 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware offers 0 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 336. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 99. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor