The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 322 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Luopan shines , with exclusive features like Drag-n-Drop Tapechart.
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 322 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 322 |
After analyzing 322 verified reviews, Luopan users most value its , while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's success, especially when weighing Luopan Arcas PMS by Luopan against RMS by RMS. Both aim to simplify operations, but they diverge significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. Luopan is a newer player without recent reviews or a recent rating, making RMS the more data-backed choice for your decision. Which one aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Luopan Arcas PMS is designed as a unified, cloud-based platform promising to centralize hotel operations across multiple properties, with core functionalities like reservations, night audit, and guest management. RMS, on the other hand, offers a broad suite of over 74 features, including advanced revenue management, channel management, and extensive integrations, backed by over 293 recent reviews with an overall rating of 4.56/5. RMS’s recent reviews highlight its ease of use, customer support, and feature depth, giving it a distinct advantage in current market confidence.
While Luopan claims to streamline workflows with mobile-first tools and a single data ecosystem, RMS’s proven track record and more recent positive user feedback suggest it is more reliable and better suited for diverse hospitality operations. Given RMS’s extensive global presence and active user base, your team may find more immediate value here. But does RMS’s feature richness truly align with your hotel’s specific needs?
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich platform with strong support and proven reliability, RMS is the clear choice. Its comprehensive functionality, including integrated channel management, trust accounting, and a guest portal, makes it suitable for hotels, resorts, and multi-property groups looking for operational efficiency and growth. Conversely, Luopan might appeal if your focus is on a unified system with core PMS capabilities and minimal integration needs, especially if you operate in regions where Luopan has a presence.
For hotels prioritizing rapid deployment, extensive third-party integrations, and a platform that has been extensively tested in diverse environments, RMS is the better fit. If your hotel is smaller or prefers a more simplified, less feature-dependent solution, Luopan’s offering might suffice, but the lack of recent reviews raises questions about its current performance and support.
RMS’s user interface consistently earns a 4.28/5 rating, with users describing it as “very user friendly” and appreciating its streamlined booking chart and intuitive workflows. RMS’s onboarding experience also scores around 4.12/5, with many users citing quick, straightforward setup and helpful support staff, including positive quotes like “support team is proactive and knowledgeable.”
Luopan scores a 0/5 across ease of use, with no recent reviews or ratings available, indicating a lack of current user feedback and potentially a less refined or less tested interface. Without recent data, it’s hard to guarantee a smooth staff adoption process. Edge: RMS.
RMS offers a comprehensive suite of 74 features, including integrated channel management, booking engine, revenue management, POS, guest CRM, online check-in, and automation tools. These features cover nearly every operational aspect, with many functionalities specifically designed for complex, multi-property management.
Luopan provides core PMS functions like reservations, night audit, and guest profiles but lacks the extensive feature set RMS offers. Its open API approach suggests potential for customization but without concrete feature counts or detailed integrations listed. Edge: RMS.
RMS’s support ratings stand at 4.48/5, with recent reviews praising its helpful, prompt, and knowledgeable staff. Comments from users include “support team is proactive and always able to help,” indicating consistent support quality and quick issue resolution.
Luopan’s customer support data is unavailable, with no recent reviews to assess support quality or responsiveness. Given RMS’s established support reputation, it has a clear advantage. Edge: RMS.
RMS boasts 112 verified integrations, including third-party providers like Criton, Sage, Fairmas, and Unifocus. Its broad ecosystem supports online booking, payment processing, POS, revenue management, and marketing tools, making it suitable for hotels seeking a connected technology stack.
Luopan has no verified partners listed, indicating fewer or no proven integrations currently available. This limits its ability to connect with other systems your hotel may already use. Edge: RMS.
RMS has a recent overall rating of 4.56/5 based on 293 reviews, with an 86% likelihood to recommend. While RMS’s user base is diverse, small to medium hotels, resorts, and extended stays give it high marks for ease of use, support, and feature depth.
Luopan’s review count and recent ratings are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. RMS’s extensive recent reviews and higher ratings strongly suggest it is the more trusted and proven choice. Edge: RMS.
Luopan does not publicly disclose pricing, and there is no information about a free trial or subscription model. This lack of transparency suggests potential variability or custom quotes, making budgeting uncertain.
RMS charges a straightforward $800 monthly fee, with no free trial offered. Its predictable pricing model allows for clearer budgeting, especially for hotels planning long-term investments. If cost transparency is key, RMS’s model is more accessible.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features like revenue management, online booking engines, or extensive third-party integrations. Also, if you're in a region where Luopan has limited support, it may hinder your operations.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small with basic needs, or if you prefer a minimal setup without many features. Also, if your budget is limited, the $800 monthly fee might be a consideration.
At its core, RMS offers a broad, proven suite of features supported by extensive recent reviews, making it the more reliable choice for most hotels. Its robust support network and scalability suit properties looking to expand or streamline complex operations.
Choose RMS if you need a trusted, feature-heavy platform with proven support, especially for multi-property management, revenue optimization, and integrations. Opt for Luopan if your hotel’s needs are more basic, regional, or you prefer a simplified, core PMS without extensive third-party connections.
For most hotels evaluating current, active platforms, RMS’s more substantial recent review data and higher ratings make it the clear option. Its comprehensive features and support infrastructure address the needs of today’s dynamic hospitality environment.
Note: Given the data, RMS is the recommended option for your hotel, thanks to its larger user base, recent positive reviews, and extensive feature set.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Housekeeping | ||
| Guest Feedback Management |
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Luopan Arcas PMS and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Luopan Arcas PMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Luopan Arcas PMS: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Luopan has an HT Score of 0 and RMS has 89. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property