The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 565 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HOTELTIME shines in workflow efficiency and ease of use — especially for RV park properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Luopan stands out with exclusive features like On premise and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 565 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 565 | 0 |
After analyzing 565 verified reviews, HOTELTIME users most value its workflow efficiency and ease of use, support and responsiveness, reservations and availability management, while Luopan users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Workflow efficiency and ease of use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservations and availability management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing, invoicing, and accounting
▾
|
|
|
−
Guest profiles and guest data management
▾
|
|
|
−
Rate management and pricing controls
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 224 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #3 238 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #8 7 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 248 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #3 246 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 145 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 49 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #52 4 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #2 384 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #5 117 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #1 21 reviews | — |
HotelTime PMS and Luopan Arcas PMS both aim to centralize hotel operations on cloud platforms, but their target users and maturity differ markedly. HotelTime serves more than 650 properties in 25+ countries, with a user base spanning resorts, boutique hotels, and branded chains. Luopan, by contrast, positions itself for mid-sized to large hotels and multi-property groups but lacks published user data or reviews.
Both platforms consolidate reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and guest management to reduce manual work and improve operational control. However, HotelTime's extensive verified integrations and strong review presence confirm its operational reliability and market adoption. Luopan promises a unified ecosystem with mobile-first tools but offers no verified partner integrations or user feedback to validate performance today.
If you manage a resort, boutique, or branded city-center hotel with up to several hundred rooms in Europe, Asia Pacific, or the Middle East, HotelTime is the proven choice. Its 4.6/5 rating across 565 reviews, including 33 in the last six months at 4.4/5, reflects current satisfaction in these segments. HotelTime’s integrations with POS and channel managers support hotels needing sophisticated revenue management and operational automation.
If you operate a mid-sized or large hotel group seeking a mobile-first platform with in-built guest engagement and multi-property management, Luopan’s product description fits this profile. However, no user reviews or verified integrations exist to confirm its usability or support quality. For properties requiring guaranteed operational stability and vendor responsiveness, Luopan’s limited market presence and lack of evidence represent significant risks.
HotelTime’s ease of use rating is 4.7/5 from 565 reviews, and its onboarding scores 4.6/5, indicating that users find it accessible and learnable. Reviewers cite fast support and an intuitive interface that reduces front desk workload, although some mention complexity in module setup and occasional cumbersome workflows during peak times. Luopan provides no user reviews or ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified in live hotel operations.
Without comparative data, the edge for ease of use remains neutral. HotelTime’s extensive user feedback evidences a generally positive user experience tempered by realistic operational challenges. Luopan’s unproven usability means no operational workflows can be confidently assessed.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime offers 53 total features, including Guest CRM, guest profiles, and a drag-and-drop tapechart for room management, which improve guest data handling and front desk workflow efficiency. These features enable staff to quickly find guest histories, customize guest interactions, and visually manage room inventory to reduce booking errors.
Luopan provides 54 features, adding on-premise deployment, SMS guest communication, a guest app, and guest messaging tools not found in HotelTime. These mobile and guest engagement features modernize the guest experience, allowing direct digital interactions and self-service options that can reduce front desk staff workload and support remote operations.
The presence of guest CRM and drag-and-drop tapechart in HotelTime helps streamline front desk and guest management workflows, while Luopan’s guest messaging and mobile app target guest engagement and operational mobility. Given the operational impact on staff workflows and guest experience, each product offers unique features with meaningful effects.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime has a 4.7/5 customer support rating from 565 reviews and 4.6/5 onboarding, supported by 33 recent reviews maintaining a 4.4/5 rating. Reviewers frequently praise HotelTime’s support for responsiveness, professionalism, and ability to solve issues quickly, directly reducing downtime in front desk and accounting workflows. Some negative reviews mention language barriers and slow resolution on rare occasions.
Luopan has no published reviews or ratings for customer support or onboarding, so no reliable comparison can be made. The lack of user feedback means support quality is unproven.
Given HotelTime’s strong, consistent support ratings and Luopan’s absence of data, customer support is verifiably better for HotelTime. However, the rating gap does not meet the 0.3 threshold for a declared edge.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime integrates with 60 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, RevControl, Lybra Tech, For-Sight, Customer Alliance, STR, Umi Digital, Quinta, and Net Affinity/Smarthotel. These integrations cover channel management, revenue management, customer feedback, and business intelligence, critical for hotels prioritizing operational automation and data-driven decision-making.
Luopan has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited third-party connectivity or immature partnership development. For hotels requiring extensive connectivity to POS, channel managers, payment gateways, or analytics tools, HotelTime’s integration ecosystem significantly reduces manual reconciliation and operational silos.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s overall rating stands at 4.6/5 from 565 reviews, with recent reviews slightly lower at 4.4/5 but still strong. Ratings are consistent across hotel segments: 4.7/5 at Bed & Breakfasts (200 reviews), 4.7/5 at Branded Hotels (150 reviews), 4.7/5 at City Center Hotels (190 reviews), and 4.6/5 at Resorts (230 reviews). This breadth shows reliable performance in various operational contexts.
Luopan has no published ratings or review volume. Without user feedback, there is no basis for a rating comparison. HotelTime’s volume and recency make it a proven product today, whereas Luopan’s unknown user satisfaction is a risk.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime publishes a base price of $600. No freemium, monthly per-room, or flat monthly pricing models are disclosed, nor are implementation fees or trials available. This transparent base price allows hotels to budget upfront for acquisition but requires direct follow-up for total cost of ownership.
Luopan does not publish any pricing information. Potential buyers must contact the vendor for quotes, adding uncertainty and complicating initial budget planning.
Price transparency favors HotelTime PMS.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime PMS and Luopan Arcas PMS both target cloud-based hotel management but diverge sharply in market presence, operational maturity, and evidence of performance. HotelTime’s extensive user base, verified integrations, and detailed reviews show a system tested across multiple hotel types and geographies. Luopan promises innovative mobile and guest engagement features for larger groups but lacks public validation.
Choose HotelTime PMS if you want a stable cloud PMS with broad functionality, strong third-party integrations, and a proven track record in boutique, branded, and resort hotels. Its guest CRM, drag-and-drop tapechart, and robust support make it suitable for properties prioritizing operational efficiency and data-driven management.
Choose Luopan Arcas PMS if your hotel group values a unified ecosystem with mobile-first tools and built-in guest communication, and you are willing to pilot a less proven platform. The inclusion of on-premise deployment and integrated guest apps offers flexibility for modern guest experiences but comes with uncertainty due to limited user feedback and integrations.
HotelTime’s strength is its operational reliability proven by 565 reviews and 60 integrations, while Luopan’s advantage lies in its mobile and guest engagement capabilities not present in HotelTime. The decision hinges on your hotel’s risk tolerance and technology priorities.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Accounting & Finance
|
|
|
| Direct billing | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
|
▾
Marketing & Ecommerce
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Administration & Configuration
|
|
|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| On premise | ||
|
▾
Customer Management
|
|
|
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Front Office
|
|
|
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Task Management | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Groups Management
|
|
|
| Group functionality | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
|
▾
Guest Experience
|
|
|
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
| ID Scanning & Registration Pre-fill | ||
| Lobby Kiosk | ||
|
▾
Housekeeping
|
|
|
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates | ||
| Automated Assignments | ||
| Real Time Reporting | ||
| Shift Planning | ||
| Employee Messaging | ||
| Online Checkout | ||
|
▾
Payments
|
|
|
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
|
▾
Reservations Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| Rate Management | ||
| Automated Space Optimization | ||
| Rules Based Room Assignments | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) | ||
|
▾
Revenue Management
|
|
|
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
|
▾
Taxes & Compliance
|
|
|
| PCI Compliant | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| SOC2 Complaint | ||
| Tax Configuration | ||
|
▾
Support & Training
|
|
|
| Online 24/7 support | ||
|
▾
Food & Beverage
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
Spa
|
|
|
| Spa & Wellness Module |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
A common theme across reviews is that HotelTime reduces daily workload through a simple, intuitive workflow for reception, cashiering, and multi-depar... A common theme across reviews is that HotelTime reduces daily workload through a simple, intuitive workflow for reception, cashiering, and multi-department operations. Even when users praise the system overall, some note that too many clicks, pop-ups, or cumbersome edit flows can slow staff down and make training or peak-time operations harder than necessary.
Users frequently mention HotelTime’s support team as a major strength, describing it as fast, reachable, professional, and often able to solve issues... Users frequently mention HotelTime’s support team as a major strength, describing it as fast, reachable, professional, and often able to solve issues immediately. Several reviews say this responsiveness reduces downtime and makes the PMS easier to rely on in daily operations, especially when hotels need quick answers during front desk or accounting work.
Reviewers consistently value HotelTime for making reservation creation, editing, room availability, and room-block handling straightforward and fast.... Reviewers consistently value HotelTime for making reservation creation, editing, room availability, and room-block handling straightforward and fast. The PMS is seen as a tool that improves booking accuracy, supports group reservations, and helps staff manage occupancy in real time, which reduces mistakes and speeds up front office work.
Where hoteliers push back
Many reviews highlight HotelTime’s billing and invoicing flow as a practical strength, especially for proformas, invoices, document matching, and cash... Many reviews highlight HotelTime’s billing and invoicing flow as a practical strength, especially for proformas, invoices, document matching, and cashier work. However, users also point to friction around invoice editing, posting journals, split bills, deposits, currency handling, and accounting reconciliation, indicating this is a high-value but complex workflow.
A smaller but important set of reviews discusses guest profile handling, including storing preferences, duplicate profiles, guest history, and documen... A smaller but important set of reviews discusses guest profile handling, including storing preferences, duplicate profiles, guest history, and document-linked data. Users want richer guest profiles and cleaner merging or search behavior so staff can serve repeat guests faster without creating duplicate records or extra manual cleanup.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. HotelTime PMS and Luopan Arcas PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HotelTime PMS offers 60 verified integration partners, while Luopan Arcas PMS offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
HotelTime PMS: No. Luopan Arcas PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HOTELTIME has an HT Score of 92 and Luopan has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property