The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 319 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
M3 shines in ease of use / learnability — especially for motel properties (4.8/5), with exclusive features like Daily Reporting and Financial Reporting.
Side-by-side ratings based on 319 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 319 | 0 |
After analyzing 319 verified reviews, M3 users most value its ease of use / learnability, customer support and training, overall satisfaction, while Microsoft users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of use / learnability
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer support and training
▾
|
|
|
+
Overall satisfaction
▾
|
|
|
+
Time and attendance / clock-in and clock-out
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Payroll processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Outdated interface / legacy feel
▾
|
|
|
−
System stability / freezing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Scheduling & Workforce Management vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 14 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #3 170 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #2 44 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 27 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 115 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 52 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #3 193 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 30 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 251 reviews | — |
| Europe | #4 3 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #3 5 reviews | — |
M3 Labor Management and Microsoft Shifts App serve distinct roles in hotel workforce management, with M3 designed specifically for hospitality labor and payroll needs, and Microsoft Shifts focused on general team scheduling and communication within Microsoft Teams. M3’s comprehensive labor management suite fits properties requiring detailed labor cost control, payroll integration, and reporting, while Microsoft Shifts suits hotels already embedded in the Microsoft Teams ecosystem seeking a lightweight, mobile-first scheduling tool for Firstline Workers.
Both systems address workforce scheduling challenges but diverge sharply in operational depth and hotel-specific functionality. M3 delivers labor optimization, real-time reporting, and financial integration that directly impacts hotel profitability. Microsoft Shifts simplifies shift scheduling and team communication but lacks tools for payroll, labor forecasting, or financial reporting essential to hotel front- and back-office workflows.
If your hotel requires robust labor cost control, payroll integration, and detailed financial reporting, M3 is the only choice supported by review-backed data. M3 holds 307 reviews averaging 4.4/5 overall with 37 recent reviews at 4.5/5, demonstrating current satisfaction and operational reliability in hospitality contexts. Its 34 unique hotel-relevant features like budgeting, labor standards monitoring, and multi-property management directly support hotel general managers’ core responsibilities.
If your property prioritizes simple shift scheduling and team messaging integrated with Microsoft Teams and you do not need payroll or financial reporting, Microsoft Shifts may suffice. However, there are no verified hotel reviews or ratings for Shifts on Hotel Tech Report, and it has no verified integrations or hotel-specific features. This lack of hotel-specific evidence limits confidence in Shifts as a comprehensive solution.
In summary, M3 is the data-backed choice for hotels committed to managing labor costs and payroll efficiently. Microsoft Shifts fits teams already using Microsoft Teams who want a basic scheduling and communication tool without payroll or advanced labor management needs.
M3 scores 4.5/5 for ease of use and 4.3/5 for onboarding across 307 reviews, with 37 recent reviews maintaining a 4.5/5 rating. Reviewers consistently report that M3 is easy to learn, simple to train staff on, and broadly usable across hotel teams, which supports quick adoption without disrupting daily operations. One user emphasized rapid onboarding coming from a different system. However, some reviews note that the interface feels outdated and occasional freezes occur, possibly impacting continuous daily use.
Microsoft Shifts has no reviews on Hotel Tech Report, so no rating data on usability or onboarding is available. Its user base is presumably familiar with Microsoft Teams, which may ease adoption for those teams, but no hotel-specific ease-of-use evidence exists.
Edge: Even.
M3 offers 34 hotel-specific features that Microsoft Shifts does not—none the other way around. Key M3 features include daily reporting, PMS mapping, general ledger integration, accounts payable, labor standards monitoring, automated labor monitoring, budgeting, forecasting, multi-property management, and mobile time clock apps. These features enable hotel managers and finance teams to control labor costs, streamline payroll, forecast staffing needs, and analyze financial impact—all critical for hotel profitability.
Microsoft Shifts focuses on scheduling and communication within Microsoft Teams, supporting shift creation, updates, shift swapping, time-off requests, and targeted messaging. It lacks financial or labor cost management tools, payroll integration, or hotel-specific reporting.
Edge: M3.
M3 has a customer support rating of 4.5/5 and onboarding rating of 4.3/5 from 307 reviews. Reviewers praise M3’s responsive, knowledgeable support team that provides timely help and clear communication. One user highlighted exceptional service from first contact through ongoing use, emphasizing professionalism and willingness to go the extra mile. Another noted support staff are friendly and able to fix problems quickly. However, some reviews mention system stability issues unrelated to support quality.
Microsoft Shifts has no customer support ratings or reviews on Hotel Tech Report to evaluate.
Edge: Even.
M3 boasts 42 verified integrations with hotel technology partners, including PMS providers like HOTELTIME, WebRezPro, innRoad, and yieldPlanet, as well as financial tools like Birchstreet and STR reporting. These integrations allow M3 to automate labor data capture, link payroll to accounting, and leverage occupancy forecasts for dynamic scheduling. This breadth supports multi-property portfolios and diverse hotel operations.
Microsoft Shifts has zero verified integrations on Hotel Tech Report. As a Microsoft Teams app, it integrates natively within that ecosystem but does not connect directly to hotel PMS, accounting, or forecasting systems, limiting operational connectivity.
Edge: M3.
M3 is rated 4.4/5 overall across 307 reviews, with 37 recent reviews rating 4.5/5. Ratings by hotel segments show strong satisfaction across boutique hotels (4.5/5, 124 reviews), branded hotels (4.5/5, 216 reviews), limited service hotels (4.6/5, 90 reviews), and bed & breakfasts (4.6/5, 132 reviews). This demonstrates M3’s broad acceptance across hotel types with substantial review volume supporting the ratings.
Microsoft Shifts has no reviews on Hotel Tech Report, so no rating comparison is possible.
Edge: Even.
M3 pricing starts at a base price of $600, with no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing published. Implementation fees are not indicated, and no trial is offered. This pricing reflects M3’s positioning as a comprehensive labor management and accounting tool rather than a simple scheduling app.
Microsoft Shifts pricing is not published on Hotel Tech Report. As part of Microsoft Teams, its cost is likely bundled with Microsoft 365 licenses, but specific hotel pricing or implementation costs are not available.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
M3 and Microsoft Shifts serve fundamentally different hotel workforce needs. M3 provides a comprehensive labor management platform with payroll integration, detailed financial reporting, and multi-property support. Microsoft Shifts offers basic scheduling and communication within Microsoft Teams, lacking hotel-specific labor cost control or payroll features.
Choose M3 if you want actionable labor cost analytics, integration with accounting systems, and a single platform to manage workforce time and expenses. M3’s 34 hotel-specific features and 42 verified integrations underpin operational efficiency and cost control, supported by 307 reviews averaging 4.4/5 overall.
Opt for Microsoft Shifts if your hotel team uses Microsoft Teams heavily and you need a straightforward, mobile-first shift scheduler and messaging tool without payroll or labor cost management. However, the absence of hotel-specific reviews, features, and integrations limits its suitability as a standalone labor management system for hotels.
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Shifts & Scheduling
|
|
|
| Shift Swapping | ||
| Auto Scheduling | ||
| Time clock app | ||
| Dynamic Scheduling | ||
| Labor Standards | ||
|
▾
Time Tracking
|
|
|
| Time clock app | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Benchmarking
|
|
|
| Benchmarking | ||
| Reporting & Analytics | ||
| Corporate Visibility | ||
| Automated Labor Monitoring | ||
| Labor Standards | ||
| Occupancy Forecast Integration | ||
|
▾
Tasks & Checklists
|
|
|
| Tasks & To Do Lists | ||
|
▾
Messaging & Communication
|
|
|
| Team Communication | ||
| Mobile App | ||
|
▾
Benefits Management
|
|
|
| Benefit Accruals | ||
| Tip Pooling |
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Using M3’s full best-of-suite solutions, we streamline all our information, which automatically feeds from our daily reports, making our financial processes much more efficient."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The hidden benefit of M3’s accounting services is that we’re able to take responsibilities off our GMs’ plates and let them step out from behind the computer."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Several reviewers say M3 is easy to use and quick to learn, especially for staff coming from another system. They describe being able to catch on quic... Several reviewers say M3 is easy to use and quick to learn, especially for staff coming from another system. They describe being able to catch on quickly and not encountering many issues during early use. This suggests the platform can reduce training time and help hotel teams adopt the system without extensive ramp-up.
Support is described positively, with responses coming quickly whenever a request is submitted. One reviewer notes that many issues turn out to be tra... Support is described positively, with responses coming quickly whenever a request is submitted. One reviewer notes that many issues turn out to be training-related, implying the vendor support team helps users resolve workflow questions efficiently. This can reduce operational friction for hotel managers, though it may also indicate the system requires guidance to use correctly.
Some users express broad satisfaction, saying they like all of it or that their broader company is happy with M3. These comments suggest the platform... Some users express broad satisfaction, saying they like all of it or that their broader company is happy with M3. These comments suggest the platform can meet core workforce needs for at least part of the customer base. However, the positive sentiment is tempered by the more specific complaints about payroll usability and system reliability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently mention using M3 for payroll, and some feel it handles the job adequately or becomes easier after learning the system. However, payro... Users frequently mention using M3 for payroll, and some feel it handles the job adequately or becomes easier after learning the system. However, payroll is also one of the most criticized areas, with one reviewer saying it is not user friendly and less intuitive than ADP. For hotels, this suggests M3 can centralize payroll operations, but the payroll experience may require training and process adaptation.
One reviewer strongly criticizes M3 for feeling like an archaic program from the 1980s and being overdue for modernization. This suggests the product... One reviewer strongly criticizes M3 for feeling like an archaic program from the 1980s and being overdue for modernization. This suggests the product may lack the polish and workflow efficiency buyers expect from current workforce software. Hotels considering M3 should be aware that the user experience may feel dated compared with newer alternatives.
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. M3 (Labor Management) and Microsoft Shifts App share many core Scheduling & Workforce Management features, but each has unique capabilities. M3 (Labor Management) offers 42 verified integration partners, while Microsoft Shifts App offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
M3 (Labor Management): No. Microsoft Shifts App: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Scheduling & Workforce Management vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. M3 has an HT Score of 98 and Microsoft has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property