The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Maestro PMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (3.8/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 58 | 0 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Maestro PMS users most value its customer support, reporting flexibility, customizable features, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizable Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and Documentation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User Interface
▾
|
|
|
−
Security Features
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #41 7 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #18 35 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #12 11 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #10 4 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #25 26 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #20 31 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #38 5 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #38 2 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #12 53 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and profitability. Maestro PMS and Softstar both aim to streamline tasks and improve efficiency, but they serve different markets and have unique strengths. Maestro PMS offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform backed by a large user base and recent reviews, whereas Softstar’s focus lies more on property automation with limited public feedback.
Are you prioritizing a system with proven reliability and extensive features, or are you looking for more specialized property management automation? Let’s see how these two products compare directly.
Maestro PMS stands out as a well-established, robust all-in-one platform designed for a wide range of hotel types, including resorts, boutique hotels, and conference centers. Its strengths include over 20 integrated modules, a long history of support, and a substantial global presence, especially in North America and Europe.
Softstar, on the other hand, is more niche, emphasizing property automation and tenant management, primarily serving rental property operators. Its AI capabilities and automation focus are appealing for property managers but lack the depth of hotel-specific features Maestro offers.
Both products aim to streamline operations, but Maestro’s extensive feature set and larger review base—56 reviews averaging 4.36/5—make it more proven in the hotel space. Softstar's limited review data and absence of recent feedback suggest less maturity.
Are you seeking a system tailored exclusively for hotels or a platform that manages diverse property types? Maestro’s more comprehensive hotel-centric approach makes it the safer choice for hotel operators.
If your hotel needs a full-featured, multi-module system capable of handling front desk, sales, catering, spa, and revenue management, Maestro PMS is the clear choice. It’s designed for properties that require flexibility, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and integrations with other systems.
Softstar is better suited for hotels managing rental or tenant properties, particularly if your focus is on automating tenant tracking, maintenance, and rental finances. Its AI-driven insights and automation features are valuable for property managers rather than traditional hotels.
For large resorts, boutique hotels, and multi-property groups, Maestro’s proven track record, extensive integrations, and recent reviews favor it. Smaller, rental-focused properties might find Softstar’s automation capabilities appealing, but without extensive hotel-specific features, it’s less comprehensive.
In summary, if your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with broad support and recent positive feedback, Maestro PMS is the definitive pick. For tenant management or rental properties, Softstar’s automation might be better—though its hotel-specific suitability remains unclear.
Maestro PMS’s ease of use has a mixed perception. It scores 4.04/5 based on user reviews, with praise for its support and onboarding processes, but some users find the interface somewhat dated and cumbersome, citing too many clicks and screens. Support is highly rated at 4.78/5, with hoteliers appreciating the quick response times and helpful staff.
Softstar, lacking review data, makes this comparison difficult. However, its AI-driven automation suggests a focus on streamlining tasks, which could translate to easier day-to-day operation for property managers. But without user feedback, it's hard to gauge actual usability.
Edge: Maestro PMS, considering its higher review count and recent positive feedback, especially on support and onboarding.
Maestro PMS offers a rich feature set with 58 unique modules, including a Spa & Wellness Module, Channel Manager, EPoS, Revenue Management, Integrated CRS, Payment Processing, Booking Engine, Housekeeping, Guest CRM, Digital Registration, and Mobile Apps. Its features support a wide range of property operations, providing a true all-in-one solution.
Softstar’s feature set is not detailed but emphasizes automation, tenant management, and AI-driven insights. It focuses on streamlining property operations rather than hotel-specific modules.
For properties that require detailed, hotel-specific functionalities—especially revenue management, online check-in/check-out, and integrations—Maestro’s extensive feature list offers a clear advantage. Softstar’s automation focus is less comprehensive for hotel operations.
Edge: Maestro PMS, with its 58 detailed features tailored to hotel needs.
Maestro PMS’s customer support is highly rated at 4.78/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, helpful assistance via phone and online chat. Customers highlight their support team’s ability to resolve issues quickly, contributing to a high likelihood (88%) of recommending Maestro.
Softstar lacks publicly available review data, making it impossible to compare support support quality directly. Given Maestro’s strong support reputation and recent reviews, it is evident that support quality heavily favors Maestro PMS.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS boasts 89 verified partners, including integrations with Criton, Curacity, Zaplox, Unifocus, Inntopia, and more. These integrations facilitate seamless operations across booking, guest engagement, revenue, and marketing channels.
Softstar reports no verified integrations, limiting its connectivity options. For hoteliers seeking a highly compatible, multi-system environment, Maestro’s extensive integration network is a major advantage.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS, with its 56 reviews, holds an average rating of 4.36/5. Recent reviews praise its comprehensive modules, excellent support, and flexibility, with some noting its user interface could be modernized.
Softstar has no publicly available recent reviews; thus, we cannot assess user satisfaction. The strength of Maestro’s large, recent review base makes it the more trusted product among hoteliers.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro’s pricing starts at $900 for the base system, with no mention of additional monthly fees or implementation costs. It is a flat fee, making budgeting straightforward.
Softstar’s pricing is not publicly available, which could suggest custom quotes or variable costs. Without clear pricing details, Maestro’s transparent structure offers more certainty.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro is ideal for large, complex, or multi-property hotels seeking an integrated, customizable PMS.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive front desk, reservation, or revenue management features. Softstar’s niche focus limits its suitability for traditional hotel operations.
Maestro PMS is a comprehensive, hotel-focused property management system with a proven track record, extensive features, and high user satisfaction. Its broad integration network and support services make it suitable for larger, complex properties or multi-property groups.
Softstar offers automation and AI-driven property management, primarily targeting rental operations. While innovative, its lack of detailed hotel features and limited review data make it less suitable for traditional hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
If you want a reliable, feature-rich PMS with recent reviews backing its performance, Maestro PMS is the clear choice. For rental properties focused on automation, Softstar may be a better fit, but its hotel-specific capabilities are less established.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Softstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Maestro PMS (Northwind) and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Spa & Wellness Module |
Showing top differences. 46 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Maestro PMS provides excellent customer support, with many users praising the quick and effective assistance available via various channels. This supp... Maestro PMS provides excellent customer support, with many users praising the quick and effective assistance available via various channels. This supportive culture is beneficial for resolving issues promptly.
Users appreciate Maestro PMS's flexibility in generating custom reports, which helps in making data-driven decisions. However, some have noted the nee... Users appreciate Maestro PMS's flexibility in generating custom reports, which helps in making data-driven decisions. However, some have noted the need for more detailed help menus and easier access to specific types of reports.
Customization is a key advantage, whether it's in reports, modules for specific property needs, or operational flexibility. Maestro PMS allows for sig... Customization is a key advantage, whether it's in reports, modules for specific property needs, or operational flexibility. Maestro PMS allows for significant tailoring, which aids in meeting unique business requirements efficiently.
Where hoteliers push back
While the system offers robust functionality, several users pointed out that the UI is slightly dated and could benefit from modernization to improve... While the system offers robust functionality, several users pointed out that the UI is slightly dated and could benefit from modernization to improve user experience, particularly for new staff members.
Security is a strong feature with options for on-premise solutions and adherence to regulations like GDPR. Enhancements like 2FA and reverse proxies a... Security is a strong feature with options for on-premise solutions and adherence to regulations like GDPR. Enhancements like 2FA and reverse proxies are also suggested by users for improved online security.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Maestro PMS (Northwind) and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Maestro PMS (Northwind) offers 89 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Maestro PMS (Northwind) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Maestro PMS (Northwind): No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Maestro PMS has an HT Score of 70 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor