The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Medialog shines , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Medialog users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #76 0 reviews | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #72 0 reviews | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #75 0 reviews | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #68 0 reviews | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #52 0 reviews | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency, guest experience, and revenue growth. Medialog and protel PMS both aim to streamline hotel management, but they serve different hotel profiles with distinct strengths. Your decision hinges on understanding their core differences, features, support, and overall suitability for your property.
Medialog, with no recent reviews and a zero-star rating, appears to have fallen out of favor, while protel PMS boasts over 105 reviews, a 4.11/5 rating, and recent feedback. Are you willing to rely on a product with minimal current customer feedback, or would a mature, well-reviewed system better serve your needs?
Medialog claims to be a unified solution for hotels and restaurants, emphasizing its long-standing history since 1988 and 24/7 support. However, the lack of recent reviews and a zero score suggest it may no longer meet modern hotel management needs effectively.
In contrast, protel has a strong presence with over 105 recent reviews, a high overall rating, and a comprehensive feature set. It is designed for hotels that prioritize integrated payments, multi-currency support, and extensive third-party integrations, making it more adaptable to current industry demands. Given the recent review activity and high rating, protel clearly has the edge here.
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable interface with minimal complexity—perhaps a small restaurant hotel or a single property—Medialog’s long history might seem appealing. But the absence of recent customer feedback and reviews makes it difficult to assess its current usability or support quality.
If your hotel requires a modern, scalable system capable of handling multiple properties, complex integrations, and detailed reporting, protel should be your pick. Its extensive ecosystem of over 1,200 integrations and proven track record in diverse hotel segments make it a safer, more future-proof choice. For most hotels, especially those focusing on growth and technology integration, protel offers a definitive advantage.
Medialog’s usability is unverified due to no recent reviews, which raises questions about its current interface, onboarding, or staff adoption. Its longstanding presence suggests familiarity, but without recent feedback, usability remains uncertain.
Protel scores a 4.12/5 on ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward navigation, and quick onboarding. Hoteliers mention that new users can understand the system fast, and staff adoption is relatively smooth. Edge: protel.
Medialog offers 4 features exclusive to it, including a channel manager, EPoS, automated night audit, and a mobile app—useful but limited in scope. The total shared features with protel are only 24, highlighting its limited functionality.
Protel, with 22 features unique to it such as multi-currency, guest CRM, SMS communication, real-time reporting, shift planning, rate management, and integrated payments, offers a broader set of tools. Its extensive feature count, combined with its size and recent activity, gives it a clear edge. Edge: protel.
Medialog’s support rating is unknown, but the total review count and recent activity suggest a lack of current customer feedback. This creates uncertainty about responsiveness and ongoing support quality.
Protel has a 3.95/5 customer support score, with recent reviews describing it as generally helpful but noting some slow response times. Nevertheless, the company’s widespread support infrastructure and positive testimonials about ongoing assistance place protel ahead. Edge: protel.
Medialog integrates with 41 verified partners, including notable systems like HQ Revenue, Mirai, and Octorate, but its ecosystem is limited compared to protel.
Protel boasts over 195 verified integrations, including key industry partners like Fairmas, Cendyn, and Vertical Booking. Its extensive ecosystem allows hotels to connect with a broad range of tools for revenue management, guest communication, and distribution. Edge: protel.
With no recent reviews, Medialog’s hotel ratings are not available, making it impossible to assess current user satisfaction. Its historical presence does not reflect recent hotel experiences.
Protel’s latest reviews give it a 4.11/5 rating, with guests appreciating its functionality, flexibility, and support. Hotels across segments like boutique, city-center, and independent properties rate it highly, especially for its integration capabilities and ease of use. Clearly, protel's customer sentiment is stronger. Edge: protel.
Medialog’s pricing is not publicly available, and the absence of recent reviews suggests it may be outdated or unavailable for new clients.
Protel costs a base fee of $500 per month, with no trial or implementation fee, making it transparent and straightforward. Given the pricing, features, and support, it provides good value for the investment. Cost-wise, protel offers a clear, predictable pricing model. Edge: protel.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in current activity and feature maturity. Medialog’s lack of recent reviews and a zero-star score indicate it may be outdated or no longer actively supported, making it a risky choice for modern hotels.
Protel, with over 105 recent reviews, a strong rating, and a comprehensive feature set, is clearly the more reliable and scalable solution for hotels aiming to grow and innovate today. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and support infrastructure give it a definitive edge and make it the recommended choice for most hoteliers in today’s competitive landscape.
In summary, if your hotel values a proven, feature-rich system with ongoing support and a large ecosystem, protel PMS offers a clear advantage. Conversely, Medialog’s current standing and review absence suggest it is best avoided unless your hotel has minimal management needs and is already familiar with the older system.
According to HTR's product database, Medialog and protel PMS (by Planet) share 24 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 14 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Medialog and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Medialog offers 41 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Medialog: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Medialog has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor