The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 27 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 27 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 27 | 0 |
After analyzing 27 verified reviews, Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) users most value its ease of use and intuitive interface, reservation and front desk management, product stability and reliability, while Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Intuitive Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Product Stability and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Detailed and Comprehensive Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Support Quality
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with Third-Party Platforms
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #74 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #19 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique | #72 1 reviews | — |
| Luxury | #51 2 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #67 0 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay | #48 1 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #44 0 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #27 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s efficiency and guest experience. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) offers a well-reviewed, feature-rich platform with recent user feedback, while Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd lacks recent reviews and detailed data. Both aim to centralize operations, but ASI’s proven track record and extensive capabilities make it the more reliable choice today. Are you ready to decide based on evidence and current user insights?
ASI PMS is the clear leader, boasting over 26 recent reviews with an average rating of 4.88 out of 5 for ease of use. Oasis PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it difficult to gauge its current performance or reliability. Given the data, ASI’s larger and more recent review base makes it the safer option for your hotel’s operational needs.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations and improve guest management, but ASI’s well-documented strengths are evident. ASI offers a cloud-based, feature-rich platform with 47 unique tools, including multi-lingual support, integrated booking engine, and real-time reporting, which Oasis lacks. Oasis, on the other hand, provides a simpler, less documented solution with no recent user feedback or detailed feature list. Do you need a proven, comprehensive system or a less established alternative? The recent review activity favors ASI, indicating ongoing support and development.
If your hotel requires a mature, feature-packed PMS with extensive integrations, choose ASI. Its 26 recent reviews demonstrate consistent user satisfaction, especially in ease of use, support, and stability. Conversely, if your hotel values simplicity over advanced features and prefers a solution with minimal complexity, Oasis might seem appealing, but the lack of recent reviews makes it a risky choice. For hotels seeking dependable, scalable technology backed by recent user validation, ASI is the clear winner.
ASI scores an impressive 4.88 out of 5 on ease of use, with reviews highlighting its intuitive interface and straightforward workflows. Users consistently mention how quickly staff can adapt and operate the system, citing smooth onboarding and minimal training time. Oasis has no available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given the data, ASI’s user-friendly design and high support ratings give it a decisive edge.
ASI offers 47 distinct features, including multi-lingual support, online check-in, integrated payment processing, guest CRM, channel management, booking engine, and automated night audits, among others. Oasis provides no documented features, limiting the ability to compare. The extensive feature set in ASI caters to diverse hotel needs, supporting scalable and complex operations. The absence of comparable features from Oasis means ASI’s feature depth and breadth are unmatched, solidifying its advantage.
ASI’s support is highly rated at 4.73 out of 5, with reviews praising prompt, courteous, and knowledgeable assistance. Users also mention efficient onboarding and proactive troubleshooting. Oasis has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate. Based on current data, ASI’s proven support quality makes it the dependable choice for hotels that need responsive, expert service in critical moments.
ASI integrates with 18 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Duetto, Cendyn, and RateGain, offering a broad ecosystem for distribution, revenue management, and guest engagement. Oasis has only 7 verified partners, including Revinate and RateGain, with fewer shared integrations. The larger, more diverse integration network in ASI enables hotels to automate more workflows and expand distribution channels. Edge: ASI.
ASI’s recent reviews reflect a high level of satisfaction across various hotel segments, with a 97% likelihood to recommend and a NPS score of 9.69 out of 10. Users praise its ease of use, support, and detailed reporting. Oasis has no recent reviews or ratings, so user sentiment cannot be reliably assessed. Given the recency and volume of positive feedback, ASI’s reputation is clearly stronger in the current market.
ASI’s pricing starts at a straightforward $300 monthly for its core system, with no additional implementation fees or hidden costs. Oasis’s pricing details are unavailable, leaving potential buyers unable to compare value directly. The transparent pricing structure of ASI makes it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly.
ASI PMS offers a comprehensive, well-supported platform with recent positive reviews and extensive features, making it ideal for hotels seeking a reliable, scalable solution. Its 26 recent reviews show consistent user satisfaction across diverse operational needs, reinforcing its market dominance. Oasis, while potentially suitable for very small or simple hotels, lacks recent validation, leaving its reliability and support status uncertain.
If your hotel needs a proven, feature-rich system with ongoing support, ASI is the clear choice. Its recent reviews, extensive integrations, and high ratings make it the more dependable option for today’s competitive hospitality landscape.
Choose ASI if you want a platform that’s been tested, trusted, and refined through years of user feedback. Opt for Oasis only if you’re prepared to assess its capabilities further, as current data does not support its widespread adoption or proven performance.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, ASI PMS and Oasis PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Direct billing | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 35 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"We needed a system that removed our dependency on remote desktop and made daily operations simpler for the team. ASI 7.0 gave us direct access, a familiar setup, and a much smoothe..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily... Users unanimously praise ASI for its user-friendly and intuitive interface, facilitating a smooth reservation management process and simplifying daily operations. It's especially accommodating for those without prior hotel industry experience.
The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and r... The ASI system excels in managing front desk tasks and reservations, providing tools that enhance the efficiency of check-in/check-out processes and room assignment.
The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments w... The ASI system is commended for its robust, stable performance, ensuring consistent and reliable operation. It's particularly valued in environments with high operational demand.
Where hoteliers push back
ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in respons... ASI's technical support is generally appreciated for being responsive and efficient in resolving issues, although some users mention delays in response times. The professionalism and helpfulness in training are highlighted.
A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory man... A recurring critique highlights the need for better integration capabilities with third-party platforms, particularly for accounting and inventory management, which could streamline broader business processes.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. ASI PMS and Oasis PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. ASI PMS offers 18 verified integration partners, while Oasis PMS offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ASI PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
ASI PMS: No. Oasis PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Anand Systems Inc. (ASI) has an HT Score of 77 and Oasis Hospitality Software Ltd has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property