The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 95 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile optimized/responsive and Pre-stay emails.
OHRS (Web CRS) shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 95 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 95 | 0 |
After analyzing 95 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its ease of use, revenue enhancement, customer service, while OHRS (Web CRS) users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Revenue Enhancement
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Complexity and Usability Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Lag in Feature Implementation
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 11 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #15 36 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #7 26 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 6 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 32 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #12 41 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #10 34 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #14 11 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #7 39 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #19 14 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #16 10 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’ iHotelier® Booking Engine and OHRS (Web CRS) hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for booking technology. While both aim to facilitate reservations, Amadeus specializes in a comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integration options, whereas OHRS offers a straightforward, less complex reservation system. How do these differences impact your team’s workflow and revenue growth?
The core distinction is that Amadeus provides a well-established, globally supported system with a proven track record and more recent, detailed reviews. OHRS, on the other hand, has limited recent feedback and a narrower feature set, making it less suitable for hotels seeking depth and sophistication.
Amadeus stands out for hotels looking for a mature, scalable booking engine with a robust global presence, offering 36 exclusive features and over 100 verified integrations. Its recent reviews emphasize its ability to boost direct bookings and revenue, with an overall rating of 4.39/5 based on 93 reviews, many of which are recent.
OHRS claims simplicity and ease of use but lacks recent reviews and a rich feature set, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Its absence of recent reviews and zero verified integrations suggest it may not support the advanced needs of larger or more complex hotels.
Your choice depends on whether you prioritize feature depth and proven market presence or a simple, barebones reservation system. Are you ready to invest in a scalable system or prefer a straightforward solution?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, globally supported booking engine with extensive integration possibilities, go with Amadeus. Its 36 exclusive features—like multi-currency, multi-lingual support, and advanced reporting—are designed to help boost direct bookings and revenue.
If your hotel requires a simple, easy-to-manage reservation system with minimal setup and basic functionality, OHRS might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or verified integrations, it’s unlikely to meet the needs of hotels aiming for growth or competitive edge.
For most hotels aiming to increase direct revenue, Amadeus offers a clear advantage. B2B hotels in need of sophisticated tools and integrations should lean toward Amadeus, while small or boutique properties with minimal tech needs might consider OHRS.
Amadeus scores a 4.25/5 for ease of use, with clear onboarding processes and positive feedback on its intuitive interface. Users mention that while some functionalities are complex initially, ongoing support and training help staff adapt effectively.
OHRS has not provided recent user feedback or detailed usability ratings, but its description as "simple" suggests a straightforward interface. However, the lack of recent reviews makes it difficult to confirm how well it supports staff adoption or ongoing usability.
Edge: Amadeus, thanks to its high usability score backed by recent, detailed reviews.
Amadeus offers 36 unique features, including mobile responsiveness, pre- and post-stay emails, automated reporting, rate flexibility, loyalty integrations, multiple payment options, and third-party booking channel support. It also provides advanced tools like A/B testing, booking abandonment recapture, and multi-currency support.
OHRS provides only basic reservation functionalities, focusing on real-time availability checks and email notifications, with no unique features listed. Its limited feature set suggests it cannot compete with Amadeus in supporting sophisticated marketing or revenue strategies.
Edge: Amadeus, with a broad suite of 36 exclusive features that support revenue growth and operational efficiency.
Amadeus receives mixed feedback on support, with a 3.22/5 support rating and comments about slow responses. Some users appreciate dedicated account managers, but others report delays in issue resolution and difficulty obtaining timely assistance.
OHRS has not published recent review data or ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Given Amadeus’s established global presence and larger support team, it likely offers more reliable assistance.
Edge: Amadeus, due to its larger support infrastructure and at least some positive recent review feedback.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partner integrations, including major systems like priority software, RevControl, and Google Hotel Ads. This extensive network supports seamless connectivity with PMS, revenue management, and marketing tools.
OHRS offers no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems or enhance operational workflows. For hotels seeking a flexible, integrated tech stack, Amadeus provides clear advantages.
Edge: Amadeus, with over 100 verified integrations supporting diverse hotel tech needs.
Amadeus’s recent reviews—totaling 93—highlight high satisfaction, especially from independent and boutique hotels, averaging ratings of 4.36/5 and 4.61/5 respectively. Its overall NPS of 8.58/10 indicates a strong likelihood of recommendation.
OHRS lacks recent, detailed review data. Its absence of feedback makes it hard to determine user satisfaction or property-specific ratings.
Based on available data, Amadeus clearly holds higher ratings and a more consistent positive review profile.
Edge: Amadeus, supported by a significant number of recent, positive reviews from diverse hotel segments.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, which is common for enterprise systems. Both operate on custom quotes, often based on hotel size, features, and integration needs.
Your team should contact each provider directly for tailored quotes; however, Amadeus’s reputation suggests it is a premium solution, potentially with higher costs reflective of its extensive features.
Not ideal if your property is small, has minimal tech needs, or prefers a simple reservation system.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to expand, requires multi-channel support, or needs advanced marketing or revenue tools.
Amadeus offers a comprehensive, heavily supported booking engine with a strong reputation and detailed recent reviews. Its broad feature set and high level of integrations make it suitable for hotels seeking growth and operational sophistication.
OHRS provides a simple, entry-level reservation system ideal for small properties or those with minimal technical requirements. Its lack of recent reviews and limited integrations suggest it is less capable for hotels aiming to scale or compete nationally.
For most hotels, especially mid-sized to large properties or those focused on revenue growth, Amadeus is the recommended choice. Smaller or budget-conscious properties may find OHRS sufficient, but with caution given the limited recent data.
Total words approximate: 3,200 words.
Booking Engine pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and OHRS (Web CRS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
OHRS (Web CRS)
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reporting | ||
| Flat, floating and discounted rates | ||
| Mobile optimized/responsive | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Urgency messaging |
Showing top differences. 24 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth... TravelClick receives high marks for ease of use from both hotel staff and end users. Its booking engine is described as intuitive, facilitating smooth handling of reservations and rate management. This user-friendliness is a key selling point.
Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with va... Many hoteliers praise TravelClick for its ability to drive revenue through advanced pricing engines, promotional tools, and better integration with various channels. Mentioned are features like multi-rate display, flash sales, and the new Web 4.0 platform, which have significantly boosted direct bookings and overall revenue.
Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow re... Opinions on customer service are mixed. While some users laud the support for being attentive and helpful, there are numerous complaints about slow response times and difficulty in resolving issues. This inconsistency is an important consideration for potential buyers.
Where hoteliers push back
TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless conn... TravelClick's robust integration with various systems, including PMS and payment gateways, is highly appreciated. Many reviews highlight seamless connectivity that supports diverse functionalities and simplifies management through unified interfaces.
Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This c... Despite its strengths, several users report challenges in usability, citing complex interfaces and a steep learning curve for certain features. This complexity can hinder optimal use of the system, especially for less experienced users.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine and OHRS (Web CRS) share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine offers 104 verified integration partners, while OHRS (Web CRS) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine: No. OHRS (Web CRS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 72 and OHRS (Web CRS) has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor