The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 151 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cendyn shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like Pre-stay emails and Post-stay emails.
Olive shines , with exclusive features like Room substitutions and A/B testing & optimization.
Side-by-side ratings based on 151 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 151 | 0 |
After analyzing 151 verified reviews, Cendyn users most value its responsive support team, ease of use, dynamic pricing, while Olive users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Responsive Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Dynamic Pricing
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration with PMS/CMS/CRMs
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Booking Engine Customization
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface Connectivity Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Booking Engine vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #17 25 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #12 59 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 27 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #2 28 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 84 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 64 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #8 41 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 15 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #3 108 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #18 9 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #18 7 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #19 2 reviews | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both Cendyn Booking Engine and Olive aim to boost your direct bookings and streamline operations, but they differ markedly in features, support, and market presence. With Cendyn's extensive review history and international reach, it clearly sits as the more established player. So, which product aligns better with your hotel's needs?
Cendyn's booking engine is a well-established platform with over 124 recent reviews, offering a broad suite of features tailored for hospitality. Its focus on conversion-boosting tools, real-time inventory management, and integration with multiple PMS and CRMs make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking proven results.
Olive, on the other hand, is a newer entrant with no reviews to date, and a limited set of integrations. While its AI-driven personalization and embedded e-commerce offer innovative guest experiences, the lack of user feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance and support quality.
Ultimately, your choice hinges on your hotel’s emphasis: proven reliability and feature depth or cutting-edge guest engagement. Are you ready to prioritize a trusted leader with extensive market presence, or are you willing to explore a promising new platform?
If your hotel needs a mature, feature-rich booking engine with proven support and broad integrations, go with Cendyn. It is ideal for mid-to-large hotels or brands that prioritize reliability, geographic reach, and a deep feature set, including email marketing, multi-currency, and social media integration.
If your hotel is a smaller property or startup seeking innovative guest engagement tools like AI-powered personalization and smart merchandising, Olive's platform might appeal. However, without reviews or an established market presence, this choice is riskier for hotels aiming for operational stability.
For most hotels evaluating between these two, Cendyn's proven track record and extensive reviews make it the more dependable option.
Cendyn scores 4.36 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Users find it straightforward to manage content and distribution, even for staff with limited technical experience.
Olive lacks review data, so its usability remains unverified. Its AI-driven features might appeal to tech-savvy teams, but without user feedback, there’s no reliable way to gauge how easy it is to implement or adopt.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn offers 20 unique features, including pre- and post-stay emails, multi-currency, multi-lingual support, social media bookings, and GDPR compliance—features that are absent in Olive. Its feature set is designed for comprehensive revenue management and guest engagement.
Olive provides 3 exclusive features: room substitutions, A/B testing, and rate plan comparisons—innovative tools but less critical for core booking functions. Many of its features focus on personalization and optimization, but lack the breadth and maturity of Cendyn.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s support team is rated 4.56 out of 5, with reviews highlighting quick response times, helpfulness, and proactive assistance. Many hoteliers appreciate their responsiveness, especially during onboarding and issue resolution.
Olive has no reviews to evaluate support quality. Its recent inception means support experiences remain unverified, and potential customers might face uncertainties during setup or troubleshooting.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn boasts 116 verified partners, including major PMS and distribution systems like Stayntouch, Oracle Hospitality, and Swayy. This extensive network facilitates seamless integration and operational flexibility.
Olive offers only 2 verified partners—Stayntouch and Oracle Hospitality—limiting options and potential compatibility. While it may grow its network over time, current integration limitations could hinder your hotel’s connectivity needs.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s overall rating is 4.38 out of 5 based on 124 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its ease of use, support, and feature effectiveness. Hotels of various segments, particularly boutique hotels and resorts, rate it highly for reliability and functionality.
Olive has no reviews, so there’s no data to assess hotel satisfaction or segment preferences. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to determine how well it meets hoteliers’ expectations.
Edge: Cendyn.
Cendyn’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no free tier or trial available. This transparent pricing reflects its mature platform and extensive feature set.
Olive does not provide publicly available pricing or trial options, which makes budgeting and comparison difficult. Its lack of transparency could be a concern for hotels seeking clear cost expectations.
Not ideal if you are a very small property with a tight budget or if you prefer a platform with limited feature requirements.
Not ideal if your property relies on extensive integrations, proven reliability, or detailed reporting.
Cendyn’s Booking Engine is a seasoned platform with a broad feature set, high customer satisfaction, and a proven track record across diverse markets. Its extensive integrations and support make it suitable for hotels that prioritize stability and performance.
Olive introduces innovative AI features and guest experience tools, but its lack of market presence and reviews make it a more speculative choice. It might appeal to tech-forward startups with flexible expectations and resources for risk.
For most hoteliers, especially those needing reliability, proven support, and extensive features, Cendyn remains the clear choice. Olive’s future potential is promising but unverified, best suited for early adopters willing to accept uncertainty.
According to HTR's product database, Cendyn Booking Engine and Olive Booking Engine share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| A/B testing & optimization | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-room bookings | ||
| Post-stay emails | ||
| Pre-stay emails | ||
| Rate plan comparisons | ||
| Room substitutions | ||
| Special offers & discounts |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The support team receives consistent positive feedback for their prompt and effective assistance. Many users note quick resolution of their queries an... The support team receives consistent positive feedback for their prompt and effective assistance. Many users note quick resolution of their queries and the team’s willingness to customize and help with technical challenges, which is crucial for maintaining uninterrupted hotel operations.
Many users praise the ease of use of the Pegasus CRS and its booking engine. The interface is described as user-friendly, allowing for quick updates t... Many users praise the ease of use of the Pegasus CRS and its booking engine. The interface is described as user-friendly, allowing for quick updates to rules, rates, and restrictions. Hoteliers noted that it’s intuitive for both new and experienced staff, speeding up onboarding and daily operations.
Dynamic pricing capabilities are frequently mentioned as a strong point of Pegasus CRS. Hoteliers highlight the flexibility to implement different rat... Dynamic pricing capabilities are frequently mentioned as a strong point of Pegasus CRS. Hoteliers highlight the flexibility to implement different rate plans and promotions swiftly, which helps in responding promptly to market demand and optimizing revenue through better pricing strategies.
Where hoteliers push back
The Pegasus booking engine offers high levels of customization, which allows hotels to align the booking process with their branding. However, some us... The Pegasus booking engine offers high levels of customization, which allows hotels to align the booking process with their branding. However, some users suggest further improvements in customization options, particularly regarding the integration of payment gateways and other enhanced features.
While the detailed reporting tools are appreciated, some users feel that the reporting capabilities could be enhanced. Specific requests include more... While the detailed reporting tools are appreciated, some users feel that the reporting capabilities could be enhanced. Specific requests include more customizable reports, better drill-down options, and improved overall usability to help hoteliers make more informed decisions.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Cendyn Booking Engine and Olive Booking Engine share many core Booking Engine features, but each has unique capabilities. Cendyn Booking Engine offers 116 verified integration partners, while Olive Booking Engine offers 2. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cendyn Booking Engine leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cendyn Booking Engine: No. Olive Booking Engine: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Booking Engine vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cendyn has an HT Score of 75 and Olive has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor