The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 34 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
OnRes shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 34 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 34 |
After analyzing 34 verified reviews, OnRes users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between OnRes PMS by OnRes and Shiji Daylight PMS by Shiji Group hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and regional presence. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management and improve guest experiences, but they differ significantly in maturity, feature set, and global reach. Your decision should be rooted in which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, technological ambitions, and support expectations.
OnRes, founded in 2014, offers a more niche, regionally focused solution with limited reviews and a smaller footprint. Conversely, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS, established in 1998 and serving a broad international market, boasts a more extensive feature set, a larger customer base, and recent, consistent reviews.
Is your hotel looking for a proven, widely adopted system with comprehensive functionalities? Or are you seeking a more tailored, regional solution that might still be evolving? Let’s compare these two property management systems in detail.
At first glance, OnRes PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS are designed to address core hotel management challenges: reservations, guest data management, and operational efficiency. However, OnRes’s current review profile is minimal, with no recent reviews or user ratings to substantiate its performance or user experience. It’s primarily positioned as a cost-effective, simple solution targeting small to mid-sized hotels in North America.
Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, benefits from over 30 recent reviews, averaging 4.63 out of 5 for ease of use and 4.53 for customer support. Its global presence and extensive feature list (98 functions unique to Shiji) demonstrate a mature, scalable platform trusted by hotels across multiple regions and segments.
Given the stark contrast in review activity and recent feedback, Shiji Daylight PMS emerges as the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven results and ongoing support. Are you comfortable with a system whose value is less documented? Or do you prioritize a platform with a strong track record and active user community?
If your hotel operates across multiple properties, especially with a need for detailed guest data, automation, and multi-property management, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear pick. Its ability to centralize guest profiles, support multi-lingual operations, and integrate with numerous third-party systems makes it ideal for larger or international hotels.
If your hotel is smaller, primarily North American, and seeks a straightforward reservation and management system with no immediate requirement for extensive integrations, OnRes might suffice. However, the absence of recent reviews and a limited feature set (only 2 verified partners) suggest it’s less prepared for complex, multi-faceted operations.
For hotels prioritizing scalability, automation, and a feature-rich environment, Shiji Daylight PMS offers concrete advantages. Conversely, OnRes could be suitable for very simple, localized operations where budget constraints outweigh advanced capabilities.
Ease of use is a key factor in project success. Shiji Daylight PMS’s high review score of 4.63/5 reflects its intuitive, user-friendly interface, supported by comprehensive training materials and a straightforward onboarding process. Users find it easy to learn, operate, and train new staff on, which reduces downtime and accelerates deployment.
OnRes, however, has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its user experience or onboarding effectiveness. Its minimal online presence and lack of recent feedback suggest it might not offer the same level of clarity or ease as Shiji, especially for new users.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts an expansive list of 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, digital registration, automated night audits, and more. It offers advanced automation, detailed reporting, and integrations with a broad ecosystem of third-party systems.
OnRes provides only 2 verified features, primarily focusing on reservations, digital marketing, and channel management. Its feature set appears limited compared to Shiji’s comprehensive suite, which can be a disadvantage if your hotel needs sophisticated operational capabilities or automation.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Group’s support system earns a strong 4.53/5 rating, with reviews highlighting its professionalism, responsiveness, and 24/7 availability. Customers appreciate the support team’s assistance during implementation and ongoing operations, which is crucial for minimizing disruptions.
OnRes’s customer support is unreviewed and has no recent feedback available, making it difficult to gauge its responsiveness or quality. Given the importance of reliable support in hotel operations, the lack of recent reviews for OnRes is a notable concern.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Shiji Daylight PMS integrates with 64 verified partners, including major booking engines, CRS, revenue management, and POS systems. Its API-driven architecture allows for seamless connectivity and automation, reducing manual data entry and errors.
OnRes has only 2 verified integrations (Whistle and OnRes itself), limiting its ability to connect with other systems. If your hotel relies on multiple technology partners, Shiji’s extensive integrations give it a significant edge.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
With over 32 recent reviews, Shiji Daylight PMS scores an average of 4.63/5 for ease of use and 4.53/5 for customer support, indicating high satisfaction. Hotels across segments—luxury, branded, city center—appreciate its user-friendly design, efficient task automation, and reliable support.
OnRes has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or performance. Given the active feedback loop, Shiji’s ratings are a clear indicator of its credibility.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
OnRes does not publicly disclose its pricing model, which suggests it may operate on custom quotes or be targeted at specific markets. Its absence of transparency could be a barrier for hotels with strict budgets or those comparing cost directly.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers a base price of $1,200 per month, with no free tier or trial, indicating a significant investment but also a comprehensive feature set. The cost aligns with its enterprise capabilities and extensive integrations.
In summary, Shiji’s transparent pricing reflects its mature, feature-rich platform, whereas OnRes’s unknown cost structure limits direct comparison.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their maturity and feature depth. Shiji Daylight PMS offers a broad, proven platform with active support, extensive integrations, and robust automation, making it suitable for hotels seeking growth and operational efficiency.
Choose OnRes if your hotel is small, localized, and primarily needs basic reservation management without the complexity of advanced integrations or automation. Its limited recent reviews and feature set suggest it’s less prepared for larger or more sophisticated operations.
When deciding, consider whether your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich system (Shiji) or a simple, cost-effective solution for limited operations (OnRes). For most hotels aiming for growth and efficiency, Shiji Daylight PMS provides the proven, comprehensive option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, OnRes PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. OnRes PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. OnRes PMS offers 2 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 65. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
OnRes PMS: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. OnRes has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property